IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v54y2017i2p421-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blind spots and pop-up spots: A feminist exploration into the discourses of do-it-yourself (DIY) urbanism

Author

Listed:
  • Megan Heim LaFrombois

Abstract

This paper is a theoretical exploration of dominant conceptualisations of do-it-yourself urbanism, which draws from and contributes to feminist inquiries into urban planning and policies. Do-it-yourself urbanism is defined as unauthorised, grassroots, and citizen-led urban planning interventions that are small scale, functional, temporary, creative, and place specific; are focused on reclaiming and re-purposing urban spaces; and take place outside formal urban planning structures and systems. This paper questions and complicates the dominant discourses surrounding do-it-yourself urbanism by highlighting the racialised, classed, gendered, and sexualised ‘blind spots’ and biases found within conceptualisations of the topic, its activities, actors, and spaces. It also investigates how do-it-yourself urbanism activities and actors are connected to and embedded in larger urban systems and policies. I argue that the dominant discourses of do-it-yourself urbanism focus on a narrow set of urban planning interventions, which may have major implications for cities and their residents. However, the terrain of do-it-yourself urbanism is diverse, fluid, paradoxical, and at times subversive, revealing bright spots for more inclusive and reflexive practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan Heim LaFrombois, 2017. "Blind spots and pop-up spots: A feminist exploration into the discourses of do-it-yourself (DIY) urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 421-436, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:54:y:2017:i:2:p:421-436
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015604078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015604078
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015604078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanu Sankalia, 2014. "The Median Picnic: Street Design, Urban Informality and Public Space Enforcement," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 473-495, August.
    2. Donovan Finn, 2014. "DIY urbanism: implications for cities," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 381-398, December.
    3. David Pinder, 2008. "Urban Interventions: Art, Politics and Pedagogy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 730-736, September.
    4. Kurt Iveson, 2013. "Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 941-956, May.
    5. Jamie Peck, 2005. "Struggling with the Creative Class," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 740-770, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonas, Michael & Segert, Astrid, 2019. "Repair und Do-it-yourself Urbanism in Wien aus Bezirksperspektive," IHS Working Paper Series 2, Institute for Advanced Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heather E. McLean, 2014. "Cracks in the Creative City: The Contradictions of Community Arts Practice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2156-2173, November.
    2. Vanessa Mathews, 2014. "Incoherence and Tension in Culture-Led Redevelopment," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1019-1036, May.
    3. Miza Moreau, 2024. "In/formal reappropriations: Spatialised needs and desires in residential alleys in Melbourne, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1031-1048, May.
    4. Marco Cremaschi & Flavia Albanese & Maurizio Artero, 2020. "Migrants and Refugees: Bottom-Up and DIY Spaces in Italy," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 189-199.
    5. Heather McLean, 2018. "Regulating and resisting queer creativity: Community-engaged arts practice in the neoliberal city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3563-3578, December.
    6. Carvajal Bermúdez, Juan Carlos & König, Reinhard, 2021. "The role of technologies and citizen organizations in decentralized forms of participation. A case study about residential streets in Vienna," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Meghamrita Chakraborty, 2023. "Linking Migration, Diversity and Regional Development in India," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 8(1), pages 55-72, January.
    8. Pierluigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2014. "Understanding culture-led local development: A critique of alternative theoretical explanations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(13), pages 2806-2821, October.
    9. Kate Golebiowska, 2016. "Are Peripheral Regions Benefiting from National Policies Aimed at Attracting Skilled Migrants? Case Study of the Northern Territory of Australia," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 947-971, August.
    10. Francis Leo Collins & Wardlow Friesen, 2011. "Making the Most of Diversity? The Intercultural City Project and a Rescaled Version of Diversity in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3067-3085, November.
    11. Stefano Bloch, 2015. "Book review: Street Art, Public City: Law, Crime and the Urban Imagination," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(13), pages 2500-2503, October.
    12. Cameron McAuliffe, 2013. "Legal Walls and Professional Paths: The Mobilities of Graffiti Writers in Sydney," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(3), pages 518-537, February.
    13. Stefano Moroni & Ward Rauws & Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "Forms of self-organization: Urban complexity and planning implications," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 220-234, February.
    14. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2022. "The Response of Creative Class Members to Regions Vying to Attract Them With Subsidies," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 45(5), pages 581-600, September.
    15. Ann Marie Fiore & Linda S. Niehm & Jessica L. Hurst & Jihyeong Son & Amrut Sadachar & Daniel W. Russell & David Swenson & Christopher Seeger, 2015. "Will They Stay or Will They Go? Community Features Important in Migration Decisions of Recent University Graduates," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(1), pages 23-37, February.
    16. Mike Raco, 2014. "Delivering Flagship Projects in an Era of Regulatory Capitalism: State-led Privatization and the London Olympics 2012," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 176-197, January.
    17. Stefan Krätke, 2010. "‘Creative Cities’ and the Rise of the Dealer Class: A Critique of Richard Florida's Approach to Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 835-853, December.
    18. Tim Bunnell & Daniel P. S. Goh & Chee-Kien Lai & C. P. Pow, 2012. "Introduction: Global Urban Frontiers? Asian Cities in Theory, Practice and Imagination," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(13), pages 2785-2793, October.
    19. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Lee, Neil, 2020. "Hipsters vs. geeks? Creative workers, STEM and innovation in US cities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103974, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Ann Markusen & Gregory H. Wassall & Douglas DeNatale & Randy Cohen, 2008. "Defining the Creative Economy: Industry and Occupational Approaches," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 22(1), pages 24-45, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:54:y:2017:i:2:p:421-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.