IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v29y2018i3p609-618..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social interactions predict genetic diversification: an experimental manipulation in shorebirds

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Cunningham
  • Jorge E Parra
  • Lucy Coals
  • Marcela Beltrán
  • Sama Zefania
  • Tamás Székely

Abstract

Polygamous Kittlitz’s plovers travel further over larger areas and interact with more individuals than the monogamous white-fronted plover. Movement patterns and social interactions influence gene flow and thus impact on speciation, although evidence from the field is limited. Here, we show that 2 Malagasy plover species exhibit different spatial behavior and social structure, consistent with existing genetic data. These results have implications for the genetic, social, and spatial processes by which new species are formed.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Cunningham & Jorge E Parra & Lucy Coals & Marcela Beltrán & Sama Zefania & Tamás Székely, 2018. "Social interactions predict genetic diversification: an experimental manipulation in shorebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(3), pages 609-618.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:3:p:609-618.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goslee, Sarah C. & Urban, Dean L., 2007. "The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i07).
    2. Göran Arnqvist & Locke Rowe, 2002. "Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6873), pages 787-789, February.
    3. Michael M. Kasumovic & Matthew J. Bruce & Marie E. Herberstein & Maydianne C.B. Andrade, 2007. "Risky mate search and mate preference in the golden orb-web spider (Nephila plumipes)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 189-195, January.
    4. Karen E Mabry & Erin L Shelley & Katie E Davis & Daniel T Blumstein & Dirk H Van Vuren, 2013. "Social Mating System and Sex-Biased Dispersal in Mammals and Birds: A Phylogenetic Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna C. Peterson & Himanshu Sharma & Arvind Kumar & Bruno M. Ghersi & Scott J. Emrich & Kurt J. Vandegrift & Amit Kapoor & Michael J. Blum, 2021. "Rodent Virus Diversity and Differentiation across Post-Katrina New Orleans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Ishrat Z. Anka & Tamsyn M. Uren Webster & Waldir M. Berbel-Filho & Matthew Hitchings & Benjamin Overland & Sarah Weller & Carlos Garcia de Leaniz & Sofia Consuegra, 2024. "Microbiome and epigenetic variation in wild fish with low genetic diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Davide Rassati & Massimo Faccoli & Robert A Haack & Robert J Rabaglia & Edoardo Petrucco Toffolo & Andrea Battisti & Lorenzo Marini, 2016. "Bark and Ambrosia Beetles Show Different Invasion Patterns in the USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2014. "Condition-dependent mate assessment and choice by peahens: implications for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1097-1104.
    5. R. Bhalla & Neil Pelkey & K. Devi Prasad, 2011. "Application of GIS for Evaluation and Design of Watershed Guidelines," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 113-140, January.
    6. repec:jss:jstsof:22:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Samantha Bothwell & Alex Kaizer & Ryan Peterson & Danielle Ostendorf & Victoria Catenacci & Julia Wrobel, 2023. "Pattern‐based clustering of daily weigh‐in trajectories using dynamic time warping," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2719-2731, September.
    8. Martha Lucía Baena & Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez, 2015. "Mobility and mating frequency in the scramble competition polygyny of a chrysomelid beetle," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 416-424.
    9. Wilson Lara & Stella Bogino & Felipe Bravo, 2018. "Multilevel analysis of dendroclimatic series with the R-package BIOdry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Kraker, Peter & Schlögl, Christian & Jack, Kris & Lindstaedt, Stefanie, 2015. "Visualization of co-readership patterns from an online reference management system," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 169-182.
    11. Matjaž Kuntner & Jonathan A Coddington, 2009. "Discovery of the Largest Orbweaving Spider Species: The Evolution of Gigantism in Nephila," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-5, October.
    12. Kneib, Thomas & Petzoldt, Thomas, 2007. "Introduction to the Special Volume on "Ecology and Ecological Modeling in R"," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i01).
    13. Ekaterina Dolbunova & Alexandre Lucquin & T. Rowan McLaughlin & Manon Bondetti & Blandine Courel & Ester Oras & Henny Piezonka & Harry K. Robson & Helen Talbot & Kamil Adamczak & Konstantin Andreev & , 2023. "The transmission of pottery technology among prehistoric European hunter-gatherers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 171-183, February.
    14. Turner, Rachel A. & Polunin, Nicholas V.C. & Stead, Selina M., 2015. "Mapping inshore fisheries: Comparing observed and perceived distributions of pot fishing activity in Northumberland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 173-181.
    15. Michael F Bonner & Russell A Epstein, 2018. "Computational mechanisms underlying cortical responses to the affordance properties of visual scenes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.
    16. Pebesma, Edzer & Bivand, Roger & Ribeiro, Paulo Justiniano, 2015. "Software for Spatial Statistics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i01).
    17. Zhiyuan Wei & Quanchao Zeng & Wenfeng Tan, 2021. "Cover Cropping Impacts Soil Microbial Communities and Functions in Mango Orchards," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, April.
    18. Annika Busse & Pablo A P Antiqueira & Alexandre S Neutzling & Anna M Wolf & Gustavo Q Romero & Jana S Petermann, 2018. "Different in the dark: The effect of habitat characteristics on community composition and beta diversity in bromeliad microfauna," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Clare C. Rittschof & Samantha A. Hilber & M. Scarlett Tudor & Colette M. St Mary, 2012. "Modeling male reproductive strategies and optimal mate number in an orb-web spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 1-10.
    20. Benoit Talbot & Dany Garant & Sébastien Rioux Paquette & Julien Mainguy & Fanie Pelletier, 2012. "Lack of Genetic Structure and Female-Specific Effect of Dispersal Barriers in a Rabies Vector, the Striped Skunk (Mephitis mephitis)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    21. Emily, Mathieu & Hitte, Christophe & Mom, Alain, 2016. "SMILE: A novel dissimilarity-based procedure for detecting sparse-specific profiles in sparse contingency tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 171-188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:3:p:609-618.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.