IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v27y2016i2p560-566..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dyadic associations and individual sociality in bighorn ewes

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Vander Wal
  • Audrey Gagné-Delorme
  • Marco Festa-Bianchet
  • Fanie Pelletier

Abstract

Sociality presumably evolved because it leads to fitness benefits; yet we know little about what drives individual variability in sociality, particularly with respect to hierarchical levels of social organization. Social network architecture is based upon dyadic interactions, but the factors affecting pairwise relationships are not necessarily those affecting higher-level network-derived measures of social behavior. We examined the influence of relatedness, age, dominance, and reproductive status on proximal associations and social network centrality of individuals in the fission–fusion society of bighorn ewes (Ovis canadensis) at Ram Mountain, Canada. From 2011 to 2013, 63–81% of adult ewes were equipped with proximity loggers, recording when they were within 1.5 m of one another. Ewe social structure was not random and individuals exhibited a tendency to have proximal associations that were consistent across years. Age and reproductive status appeared to have a weak effect on network centrality, but this effect was largely absent for frequency of proximal association. Furthermore, we found no effect of dominance rank on either proximal associations or network centrality. We speculate that interannual variation in these relationships may be indicative of predation affecting social dynamics. The disconnect between determinants that affect the costs and benefits of dyadic associations and those that emerge from network-derived behaviors highlights the importance of testing effects at multiple levels of social organization in animal societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Vander Wal & Audrey Gagné-Delorme & Marco Festa-Bianchet & Fanie Pelletier, 2016. "Dyadic associations and individual sociality in bighorn ewes," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 560-566.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:560-566.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arv193
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goslee, Sarah C. & Urban, Dean L., 2007. "The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i07).
    2. Noa Pinter-Wollman & Elizabeth A. Hobson & Jennifer E. Smith & Andrew J. Edelman & Daizaburo Shizuka & Shermin de Silva & James S. Waters & Steven D. Prager & Takao Sasaki & George Wittemyer & Jennife, 2014. "The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 242-255.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Rassati & Massimo Faccoli & Robert A Haack & Robert J Rabaglia & Edoardo Petrucco Toffolo & Andrea Battisti & Lorenzo Marini, 2016. "Bark and Ambrosia Beetles Show Different Invasion Patterns in the USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. repec:jss:jstsof:22:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Jordán, Ferenc, 2022. "The network perspective: Vertical connections linking organizational levels," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    4. Wilson Lara & Stella Bogino & Felipe Bravo, 2018. "Multilevel analysis of dendroclimatic series with the R-package BIOdry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Kraker, Peter & Schlögl, Christian & Jack, Kris & Lindstaedt, Stefanie, 2015. "Visualization of co-readership patterns from an online reference management system," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 169-182.
    6. Kneib, Thomas & Petzoldt, Thomas, 2007. "Introduction to the Special Volume on "Ecology and Ecological Modeling in R"," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i01).
    7. Ivan D Chase & W Brent Lindquist, 2016. "The Fragility of Individual-Based Explanations of Social Hierarchies: A Test Using Animal Pecking Orders," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Michael F Bonner & Russell A Epstein, 2018. "Computational mechanisms underlying cortical responses to the affordance properties of visual scenes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Pebesma, Edzer & Bivand, Roger & Ribeiro, Paulo Justiniano, 2015. "Software for Spatial Statistics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i01).
    10. Derek Murphy & Hannah S Mumby & Michelle D Henley & Andrea Griffin, 2020. "Age differences in the temporal stability of a male African elephant (Loxodonta africana) social network," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 21-31.
    11. Benoit Talbot & Dany Garant & Sébastien Rioux Paquette & Julien Mainguy & Fanie Pelletier, 2012. "Lack of Genetic Structure and Female-Specific Effect of Dispersal Barriers in a Rabies Vector, the Striped Skunk (Mephitis mephitis)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-7, November.
    12. Lucas P. Martins & Daniel B. Stouffer & Pedro G. Blendinger & Katrin Böhning-Gaese & Galo Buitrón-Jurado & Marta Correia & José Miguel Costa & D. Matthias Dehling & Camila I. Donatti & Carine Emer & M, 2022. "Global and regional ecological boundaries explain abrupt spatial discontinuities in avian frugivory interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. repec:jss:jstsof:31:i03 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Elizabeth A Hobson & Simon DeDeo, 2015. "Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Anna C. Peterson & Himanshu Sharma & Arvind Kumar & Bruno M. Ghersi & Scott J. Emrich & Kurt J. Vandegrift & Amit Kapoor & Michael J. Blum, 2021. "Rodent Virus Diversity and Differentiation across Post-Katrina New Orleans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Ishrat Z. Anka & Tamsyn M. Uren Webster & Waldir M. Berbel-Filho & Matthew Hitchings & Benjamin Overland & Sarah Weller & Carlos Garcia de Leaniz & Sofia Consuegra, 2024. "Microbiome and epigenetic variation in wild fish with low genetic diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. R. Bhalla & Neil Pelkey & K. Devi Prasad, 2011. "Application of GIS for Evaluation and Design of Watershed Guidelines," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 113-140, January.
    18. Charles Cunningham & Jorge E Parra & Lucy Coals & Marcela Beltrán & Sama Zefania & Tamás Székely, 2018. "Social interactions predict genetic diversification: an experimental manipulation in shorebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(3), pages 609-618.
    19. Samantha Bothwell & Alex Kaizer & Ryan Peterson & Danielle Ostendorf & Victoria Catenacci & Julia Wrobel, 2023. "Pattern‐based clustering of daily weigh‐in trajectories using dynamic time warping," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2719-2731, September.
    20. Daizaburo Shizuka & Allison E Johnson & Leigh Simmons, 2020. "How demographic processes shape animal social networks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 1-11.
    21. Ekaterina Dolbunova & Alexandre Lucquin & T. Rowan McLaughlin & Manon Bondetti & Blandine Courel & Ester Oras & Henny Piezonka & Harry K. Robson & Helen Talbot & Kamil Adamczak & Konstantin Andreev & , 2023. "The transmission of pottery technology among prehistoric European hunter-gatherers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 171-183, February.
    22. Turner, Rachel A. & Polunin, Nicholas V.C. & Stead, Selina M., 2015. "Mapping inshore fisheries: Comparing observed and perceived distributions of pot fishing activity in Northumberland," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 173-181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:560-566.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.