IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i1p228-238..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extrapair paternity in Mediterranean blue tits: socioecological factors and the opportunity for sexual selection

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente García-Navas
  • Esperanza S. Ferrer
  • Javier Bueno-Enciso
  • Rafael Barrientos
  • Juan José Sanz
  • Joaquín Ortego

Abstract

The frequency of extrapair paternity within populations has been hypothesized to be related to ecological and social factors, which in turn can determine the impact of extrapair paternity on the opportunity for sexual selection. Here, we use the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus as study species to assess both issues. In particular, we analyze patterns of extrapair paternity in 12 nest-box plots that greatly vary in local population size, level of nest-box aggregation, and breeding density. We found a significant positive relationship between extrapair paternity rate and local population size. Within study plots, neither local breeding density nor synchrony had an effect on the occurrence of extrapair paternity. Most extrapair males engaged in extrapair copulations with neighbouring females, probably in order to avoid paternity losses. Individuals that travelled larger distances to gain extrapair paternity likely did so because the social females of most of them had not yet begun their fertile period and, thus, within-pair paternity was not at risk. Variance in male reproductive success was mostly produced by variance in within-pair success, which in turn was primarily influenced by mate quality. Extrapair success contributed substantially to variance in male reproductive success (26%), but its effect was smaller than expected. Bateman gradients showed positive slopes (βss) for both males and females. However, the lack of a positive covariance between within-pair and extrapair success suggests that the effect of extrapair paternity on the strength of sexual selection was limited. This fact can be explained by the spatial distribution of extrapair fertilizations, which points to the absence of directional female mating preferences in this study system and, thus, not leading to "big winners" and "big losers."

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente García-Navas & Esperanza S. Ferrer & Javier Bueno-Enciso & Rafael Barrientos & Juan José Sanz & Joaquín Ortego, 2014. "Extrapair paternity in Mediterranean blue tits: socioecological factors and the opportunity for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 228-238.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:228-238.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy C. Dolan & Michael T. Murphy & Lucas J. Redmond & Karen Sexton & Debbie Duffield, 2007. "Extrapair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in a socially monogamous passerine," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(6), pages 985-993.
    2. N.M. Gerlach & J.W McGlothlin & P.G Parker & E.D Ketterson, 2012. "Reinterpreting Bateman gradients: multiple mating and selection in both sexes of a songbird species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1078-1088.
    3. Katie LaBarbera & Paulo E. Llambías & Emily R. A. Cramer & Taza D. Schaming & Irby J. Lovette, 2010. "Synchrony does not explain extrapair paternity rate variation in northern or southern house wrens," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(4), pages 773-780.
    4. Deborah M. Gordon, 2011. "The fusion of behavioral ecology and ecology," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 225-230.
    5. David Canal & Roger Jovani & Jaime Potti, 2012. "Male decisions or female accessibility? Spatiotemporal patterns of extra pair paternity in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1146-1153.
    6. Linda A. Whittingham & Peter O. Dunn, 2005. "Effects of extra-pair and within-pair reproductive success on the opportunity for selection in birds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 138-144, January.
    7. Cassandra Cameron & Dominique Berteaux & France Dufresne, 2011. "Spatial variation in food availability predicts extrapair paternity in the arctic fox," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(6), pages 1364-1373.
    8. Karen L. Wiebe & Bart Kempenaers, 2009. "The social and genetic mating system in flickers linked to partially reversed sex roles," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 453-458.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhatia, Ankita & Chandani, Arti & Chhateja, Jagriti, 2020. "Robo advisory and its potential in addressing the behavioral biases of investors — A qualitative study in Indian context," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    2. Denis Réale & Mahdi Khelfaoui & Pierre-Olivier Montiglio & Yves Gingras, 2020. "Mapping the dynamics of research networks in ecology and evolution using co-citation analysis (1975–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1361-1385, March.
    3. Alejandro G. Farji-Brener & Mariana Tadey, 2012. "Trash to treasure: leaf-cutting ants repair nest-mound damage by recycling refuse dump materials," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1195-1202.
    4. Noa Pinter-Wollman & Deborah M. Gordon & Susan Holmes, 2012. "Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1022-1029.
    5. Peter Santema & Bart Kempenaers, 2023. "Experimentally advancing morning emergence time does not increase extra-pair siring success in blue tit males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 346-353.
    6. Rômulo Carleial & Tommaso Pizzari & David S. Richardson & Grant C. McDonald, 2023. "Disentangling the causes of temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Emily R.A. Cramer, 2013. "Vocal deviation and trill consistency do not affect male response to playback in house wrens," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 412-420.
    8. Farida S. Rasiwala & Bindya Kohli, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: Understanding Stakeholders Perception on Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Finance," International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 48-65, January.
    9. S. Ferguson & D. Berteaux & A. Gaston & J. Higdon & N. Lecomte & N. Lunn & M. Mallory & J. Reist & D. Russell & N. Yoccoz & X. Zhu, 2012. "Time series data for Canadian arctic vertebrates: IPY contributions to science, management, and policy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 235-258, November.
    10. Daniel Parejo-Pulido & Lorenzo Pérez-Rodríguez & Inmaculada Abril-Colón & Jaime Potti & Tomás Redondo, 2023. "Passive and active parental food allocation in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 729-740.
    11. Gine Roll Skjærvø & Eivin Røskaft, 2015. "Wealth and the opportunity for sexual selection in men and women," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 444-451.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:228-238.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.