IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i6p1195-1202..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trash to treasure: leaf-cutting ants repair nest-mound damage by recycling refuse dump materials

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro G. Farji-Brener
  • Mariana Tadey

Abstract

Animals adjust their behaviors in response to changing environmental conditions because the costs and benefits of such behaviors change as conditions change. The reuse of materials from waste (i.e., recycling) rarely occurs in social insects because it may imply significant health risks and behavioral difficulties. However, the benefit of reusing may exceed its costs under certain circumstances. For the first time, we document that ants "recycle" refuse materials to repair nest-mound damage. We conducted a series of field measurements and experiments to test the hypotheses that fluctuations in this behavior in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis depend on 1) seasonal changes in the tendency to reject refuse (a proxy of changes in their pathogen levels), and/or 2) seasonal foraging restrictions. We 1) measured the rejection of foraging ants toward experimental refuse piles among seasons and 2) analyzed how mound condition, temperatures of fungus chamber and soil surface, and foraging activity explained this behavior using a classification tree, a powerful recursive partitioning method. Foraging ants showed similar rejection levels toward refuse piles in different seasons. Colonies repaired mound damage with refuse materials only during the hottest season and when they had low foraging rates, suggesting that ants recycle their refuse by a hierarchical set of decisions dependent on the risk of fungal damage and foraging restrictions. Repairing the mounds is essential during summer, when temperatures inside damaged mounds are lethal to their fungus cultures. However, these high temperatures also restrict the foraging activity, reducing the collection of building materials. Thus, colonies with lower foraging rates apparently use their refuse to repair mounds because this substrate requires less searching and carrying time. The use of refuse did not affect the colony growth rate. This illustrates how ants integrate information about food, hygienic and nest conditions through a novel and plastic behavior: recycling of their discarded materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro G. Farji-Brener & Mariana Tadey, 2012. "Trash to treasure: leaf-cutting ants repair nest-mound damage by recycling refuse dump materials," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1195-1202.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1195-1202.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam G. Hart & Francis L. W. Ratnieks, 2002. "Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 224-231, March.
    2. Hubert Herz & Bert Hölldobler & Flavio Roces, 2008. "Delayed rejection in a leaf-cutting ant after foraging on plants unsuitable for the symbiotic fungus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 575-582.
    3. Deborah M. Gordon, 2011. "The fusion of behavioral ecology and ecology," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 225-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhatia, Ankita & Chandani, Arti & Chhateja, Jagriti, 2020. "Robo advisory and its potential in addressing the behavioral biases of investors — A qualitative study in Indian context," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    2. Vicente García-Navas & Esperanza S. Ferrer & Javier Bueno-Enciso & Rafael Barrientos & Juan José Sanz & Joaquín Ortego, 2014. "Extrapair paternity in Mediterranean blue tits: socioecological factors and the opportunity for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 228-238.
    3. Denis Réale & Mahdi Khelfaoui & Pierre-Olivier Montiglio & Yves Gingras, 2020. "Mapping the dynamics of research networks in ecology and evolution using co-citation analysis (1975–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1361-1385, March.
    4. Pierre-André Eyer & Julien Freyer & Serge Aron, 2013. "Genetic polyethism in the polyandrous desert ant Cataglyphis cursor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 144-151.
    5. Niccolo Caldararo, 2015. "Social behavior and the superorganism: Implications for disease and stability in complex animal societies and Colony Collapse Disorder in Honeybees," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 13(1), pages 82-98.
    6. Noa Pinter-Wollman & Deborah M. Gordon & Susan Holmes, 2012. "Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1022-1029.
    7. Farida S. Rasiwala & Bindya Kohli, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: Understanding Stakeholders Perception on Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Finance," International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 48-65, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1195-1202.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.