IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p444-451..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wealth and the opportunity for sexual selection in men and women

Author

Listed:
  • Gine Roll Skjærvø
  • Eivin Røskaft

Abstract

Sexual selection theory suggests that males benefit more than females from multiple mates and that sexual selection is weak in monogamous mating systems. However, little research on sexual selection has been conducted simultaneously in men and women, and we lack a detailed understanding of the socioecological factors that can influence it. Here, we examined the effects of wealth and sex on 2 distinct episodes of human sexual selection (marry once and remarry) in historical Norwegian populations with imposed monogamy, where remarriage was only possible after widowhood. We quantified sexual selection using the Bateman gradient. We also examined the underlying proximate factors that might influence the odds of remarriage and reproduction after widowhood. We found that the intensity of sexual selection corresponds well with Bateman gradients measured in other monogamous populations and was stronger for those who married once than for those who remarried. The selection gradients on "marry once" were affected by neither sex nor wealth. However, when we measured the gradients on "remarry," sexual selection was stronger on wealthy men and women compared with those who were poor. Remarriage age was the most important underlying factor explaining how widows increased reproductive success. For widowers, it was to remarry a younger woman than themselves. In conclusion, we show that sexual selection can operate on both sexes in a monogamous population and suggest that under certain circumstances (when very wealthy), women can benefit as much as men can by remarriage.

Suggested Citation

  • Gine Roll Skjærvø & Eivin Røskaft, 2015. "Wealth and the opportunity for sexual selection in men and women," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 444-451.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:444-451.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru213
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly A. Rosvall, 2011. "Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(6), pages 1131-1140.
    2. N.M. Gerlach & J.W McGlothlin & P.G Parker & E.D Ketterson, 2012. "Reinterpreting Bateman gradients: multiple mating and selection in both sexes of a songbird species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1078-1088.
    3. Markus Jokela & Anna Rotkirch & Ian J. Rickard & Jenni Pettay & Virpi Lummaa, 2010. "Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 906-912.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Shea, 2019. "The Macroeconomics of Pascal’s Wager," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 45(4), pages 481-496, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Rotkirch & Heini Väisänen & Markus Jokela & Stuart Basten, 2011. "Baby longing and men’s reproductive motivation," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 9(1), pages 283-306.
    2. Zitan Song & Yao Liu & Isobel Booksmythe & Changqing Ding, 2017. "Effects of individual-based preferences for colour-banded mates on sex allocation in zebra finches," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1228-1235.
    3. Rômulo Carleial & Tommaso Pizzari & David S. Richardson & Grant C. McDonald, 2023. "Disentangling the causes of temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Catalano, Ralph, 2011. "Selection in utero contributes to the male longevity deficit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 999-1003, March.
    5. Ivette A Chamorro-Florescano & Mario E Favila & Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez, 2017. "Contests over reproductive resources in female roller beetles: Outcome predictors and sharing as an option," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Vicente García-Navas & Esperanza S. Ferrer & Javier Bueno-Enciso & Rafael Barrientos & Juan José Sanz & Joaquín Ortego, 2014. "Extrapair paternity in Mediterranean blue tits: socioecological factors and the opportunity for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 228-238.
    7. Ana M. Beltrán-Morillas & Laura Villanueva-Moya & M. Dolores Sánchez-Hernández & María Alonso-Ferres & Marta Garrido-Macías & Francisca Expósito, 2023. "Infidelity in the Adolescence Stage: The Roles of Negative Affect, Hostility, and Psychological Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Karan J Odom & David M Logue & Colin E Studds & Michelle K Monroe & Susanna K Campbell & Kevin E Omland, 2017. "Duetting behavior varies with sex, season, and singing role in a tropical oriole (Icterus icterus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1256-1265.
    9. Malin Ah-King, 2022. "The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Juan G Rubalcaba & Daniel Fuentes & José P Veiga & Vicente Polo, 2017. "Nest decoration as social signals by males and females: greenery and feathers in starling colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1369-1375.
    11. Anna-Maria Borshagovski & Gautier Baudry & Juhani Hopkins & Arja Kaitala, 2019. "Pale by comparison: competitive interactions between signaling female glow-worms," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 20-26.
    12. Rannveig Kaldager Hart, 2019. "Union Histories of Dissolution: What Can They Say About Childlessness?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(1), pages 101-131, February.
    13. Ben Malinga John, 2023. "Neglected forces of fertility variation in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of marital dissolution and repartnering," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2023-031, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:444-451.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.