IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i4p723-728..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preserving perceptual distances in chromaticity diagrams

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas W. Pike

Abstract

Chromaticity diagrams—Cartesian plots that depict the multidimensional subjective relationship between perceived colors, independent of intensity—are widely used in studies of animal color vision, as they allow direct links to be made between color discrimination and color vision–mediated behaviors. However, because these diagrams are invariant to the differences in noise levels between photoreceptor classes that underlie some models of color discrimination thresholds, the distance between colors in chromaticity space is not necessarily related to their perceptual distance. The geometric interpretation of color data from chromaticity diagrams may therefore lead to misleading conclusions. This paper describes a method of plotting visual perceptual distances derived from the noise-corrected model of Vorobyev and Osorio (Vorobyev M, Osorio D. 1998. Receptor noise as a determinant of color thresholds. Proc R Soc B. 265:351–358) such that the perceptual distance between them is exactly preserved. It also describes how both chromatic (color) and achromatic (brightness) contrasts can be visualized within the same diagram. The potential benefits of this approach over commonly used triangular and tetrahedral chromaticity diagrams are discussed with regards to the study of animal visual ecology.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas W. Pike, 2012. "Preserving perceptual distances in chromaticity diagrams," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 723-728.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:723-728.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adeline Loyau & Doris Gomez & Benoit Moureau & Marc Théry & Nathan S. Hart & Michel Saint Jalme & Andrew T.D. Bennett & Gabriele Sorci, 2007. "Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(6), pages 1123-1131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaspar Delhey & Valdemar Delhey & Bart Kempenaers & Anne Peters, 2015. "A practical framework to analyze variation in animal colors using visual models," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 367-375.
    2. Russell A Ligon & Kevin J McGraw, 2018. "A chorus of color: hierarchical and graded information content of rapid color change signals in chameleons," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1075-1087.
    3. Peter Olsson & Olle Lind & Almut Kelber & Leigh Simmons, 2018. "Chromatic and achromatic vision: parameter choice and limitations for reliable model predictions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(2), pages 273-282.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2014. "Condition-dependent mate assessment and choice by peahens: implications for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1097-1104.
    2. Darrell J. Kemp & Marie E. Herberstein & Gregory F. Grether, 2012. "Unraveling the true complexity of costly color signaling," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 233-236.
    3. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2013. "Editor's choice Eye for an eyespot: how iridescent plumage ocelli influence peacock mating success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1048-1057.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:723-728.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.