IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/amlawe/v8y2006i2p312-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capitalizing on Segregation, Pretending Neutrality: College Admissions and the Texas Top 10% Law

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Tienda
  • Sunny Xinchun Niu

Abstract

In response to the judicial ban on the use of race-sensitive admissions, the seventy-fifth Texas legislature passed H.B. 588, which guarantees admission to any Texas public college or university for all seniors graduating in the top decile of their class. We show that high levels of residential and school segregation facilitate minority enrollment at selective public institutions under the uniform admission law because black and Hispanic students who rank at the top of their class disproportionately hail from minority-dominant schools. However, qualifying minority students' lower likelihood of college enrollment at the flagships reflects concentrated disadvantage rather than segregation per se. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Tienda & Sunny Xinchun Niu, 2006. "Capitalizing on Segregation, Pretending Neutrality: College Admissions and the Texas Top 10% Law," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 312-346.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:8:y:2006:i:2:p:312-346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aler/ahl006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dylan Conger & Lisa Dickson, 2017. "Gender Imbalance in Higher Education: Insights for College Administrators and Researchers," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(2), pages 214-230, March.
    2. Sandra E. Black & Jeffrey T. Denning & Jesse Rothstein, 2023. "Winners and Losers? The Effect of Gaining and Losing Access to Selective Colleges on Education and Labor Market Outcomes," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 26-67, January.
    3. Conger, Dylan, 2015. "High school grades, admissions policies, and the gender gap in college enrollment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 144-147.
    4. Jason Fletcher & Marta Tienda, 2010. "Race and Ethnic Differences in College Achievement: Does High School Attended Matter?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 627(1), pages 144-166, January.
    5. Donnell Butler, 2010. "Ethno-Racial Composition and College Preference: Revisiting the Perpetuation of Segregation Hypothesis," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 627(1), pages 36-58, January.
    6. Klasik, Daniel & Cortes, Kalena E., 2022. "Uniform admissions, unequal access: Did the top 10% plan increase access to selective flagship institutions?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Cortes, Kalena E. & Klasik, Daniel, 2020. "Uniform Admissions, Unequal Access: Did the Top 10% Plan Increase Access to Selective Flagship Institutions?," IZA Discussion Papers 13988, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Angel Harris & Marta Tienda, 2010. "Minority Higher Education Pipeline: Consequences of Changes in College Admissions Policy in Texas," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 627(1), pages 60-81, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:8:y:2006:i:2:p:312-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/aler .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.