IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v101y2019i1p74-88..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing Certifiers: Evidence from the British Retail Consortium Food Safety Standard

Author

Listed:
  • Talia Bar
  • Yuqing Zheng

Abstract

Standards play a vital role in promoting food safety, and in many countries third-party certification bodies carry out audits to determine if food manufacturers comply with a particular standard. Using data from the British Retail Consortium global standards program, we study manufacturers’ choices of certification bodies. We take a certification body’s share of high audit grades in the months preceding an audit as a measure of perceived leniency, and find that manufacturers are more likely to choose certification bodies that they perceive to be more lenient. Manufactures are also more likely to choose geographically closer certification bodies, and to return to the same certifier that audited their site in the previous year.

Suggested Citation

  • Talia Bar & Yuqing Zheng, 2019. "Choosing Certifiers: Evidence from the British Retail Consortium Food Safety Standard," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(1), pages 74-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:1:p:74-88.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aay024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lijiao Hu & Yuqing Zheng & Timothy A. Woods & Yoko Kusunose & Steven Buck, 2023. "The market for private food safety certifications: Conceptual framework, review, and future research directions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 197-220, March.
    2. Shufen Tang & Yuqing Zheng & Taiping Li & Li Zhou, 2021. "The hold‐up problem in China's broiler industry: Empirical evidence from Jiangsu Province," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(4), pages 539-554, December.
    3. Yuqing Zheng & Talia Bar, 2023. "Certifier competition and audit grades: An empirical examination using food safety certification," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 182-196, March.
    4. Tang, Shufen & Zheng, Yuqing & Li, Taiping & Zhou, Li, 2021. "The Hold-up Problem in China’s Broiler Industry: Empirical Evidence from Jiangsu Province," 2021 ASAE 10th International Conference (Virtual), January 11-13, Beijing, China 329410, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    5. John Bovay, 2023. "Food safety, reputation, and regulation," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 684-704, June.
    6. Annalisa Zezza & Federica Demaria & Tiziana Laureti & Luca Secondi, 2020. "Supervising third-party control bodies for certification: the case of organic farming in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Samane Zare & Mahdi Asgari & Timothy Woods & Yuqing Zheng, 2020. "Consumer proximity and brand loyalty in craft soda marketing: A case study of Ale‐8‐One," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 522-541, October.
    8. Bahalou Horeh, Marziyeh & Elbakidze, Levan, 2020. "Economic Efficiency of Food Safety Modernization Act: Preventing Illnesses from Contaminated Water," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304637, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:101:y:2019:i:1:p:74-88.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.