IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/bulimm/v23y2023p413-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logistics Systems Digitalisation And Software Quality: Why It'S Important And How It'S Related To Iso/Iec 25010

Author

Listed:
  • Borut Jereb

    (University of Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Milena Kajba

    (University of Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

Software quality is critical in supply chains, ensuring that software products meet user expectations and deliver value by digitalising their business. Organisations rely on established standards and frameworks to achieve and assess software quality effectively. The ISO/IEC 25000 family of standards, also known as the SQuaRE (Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation) series, provides a comprehensive and internationally recognised set of guidelines for software quality management. The ISO/IEC 25000 series consists of standards and technical reports covering various aspects of software quality characteristics, including quality models, evaluation processes, and measurement methods. ISO/IEC 25010 serves as the core standard in the series, defining a comprehensive quality model and a set of quality characteristics. Quality characteristics encompass functionality, reliability, usability, efficiency, maintainability, and portability. By following these characteristics, organisations can evaluate, measure, and improve the quality of software products. It also provides a systematic approach enabling organisations to set quality requirements, define evaluation criteria, and select appropriate evaluation techniques. These standards promote consistency and comparability in software quality evaluation, facilitating effective communication among stakeholders, improve decision-making processes, enable effective risk management, enhance customer satisfaction, and promote continuous improvement. By aligning with these standards, supply chain organisations can achieve greater transparency, reliability, and interoperability in their digitalised business processes. This paper explores the significance of software quality and its relationship to the ISO/IEC 25010 standard in a supply chain, a complex logistics system consisting of logistics processes and facilities that transform raw materials into finished products, which are later distributed to end consumers. This paper delves into the details of the ISO/IEC 25010, which provides key guidelines for ensuring software quality. Practical examples of standards usage will be presented by Software Quality Measurement (SQM) model and evaluation of vehicle telematics to better understand how standards can enhance the quality of technological solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Borut Jereb & Milena Kajba, 2023. "Logistics Systems Digitalisation And Software Quality: Why It'S Important And How It'S Related To Iso/Iec 25010," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 23, pages 413-430.
    • Handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:23:y:2023:p:413-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/bulimm/PDF/BusinessLogisticsinModernManagement23/blimm2323.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buxmann, Peter & Ahsen, Anette von & Martin Diaz, Luis & Wolf, Kristina, 2004. "Usage and Evaluation of Supply Chain Management Software - Results of an Empirical Study in the European Automotive Industry," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 37792, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Nasir, Mohammed Haneef Abdul & Genovese, Andrea & Acquaye, Adolf A. & Koh, S.C.L. & Yamoah, Fred, 2017. "Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 443-457.
    3. Di Vaio, Assunta & Varriale, Luisa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain management for sustainable performance: Evidence from the airport industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    2. Sarah C. Andersen & Harpa Birgisdottir & Morten Birkved, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessments of Circular Economy in the Built Environment—A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Claudia Aparecida De Mattos & Thiago Lourenço Meira De Albuquerque, 2018. "Enabling Factors and Strategies for the Transition Toward a Circular Economy (CE)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Md Nazrul Islam & Md Mofazzal Hossain & Md Shafayet Shahed Ornob, 2024. "Business research on Industry 4.0: a systematic review using topic modelling approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Chris Turner & John Oyekan & Lampros K. Stergioulas, 2021. "Distributed Manufacturing: A New Digital Framework for Sustainable Modular Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Broccardo, Laura & Zicari, Adrián & Jabeen, Fauzia & Bhatti, Zeeshan A., 2023. "How digitalization supports a sustainable business model: A literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Das, Debabrata & Dutta, Pankaj, 2022. "Product return management through promotional offers: The role of consumers’ loss aversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    9. Doussoulin, Jean Pierre & Bittencourt, Mariana, 2022. "How effective is the construction sector in promoting the circular economy in Brazil and France? : A waste input-output analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 47-58.
    10. Almeida Prado Cestari, José Marcelo & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Deschamps, Fernando & Morton Van Aken, Eileen & Treinta, Fernanda & Moura, Louisi Francis, 2018. "A case study extension methodology for performance measurement diagnosis in nonprofit organizations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 225-238.
    11. Shady Shayegan & Ardeshir Bazrkar & Reza Yadegari, 2023. "Realization of Sustainable Organizational Performance Using New Technologies and Green Human Resource Management Practices," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 17(2), pages 95-105.
    12. Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Malesios, Chrysovalantis & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Saha, Krishnendu & Budhwar, Pawan & De, Debashree, 2022. "Adoption of circular economy practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Europe," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    13. Kai Xue & Md. Uzzal Hossain & Meng Liu & Mingjun Ma & Yizhi Zhang & Mengqiang Hu & XiaoYi Chen & Guangyu Cao, 2021. "BIM Integrated LCA for Promoting Circular Economy towards Sustainable Construction: An Analytical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Ranganathan, C. & Teo, Thompson S.H. & Dhaliwal, Jasbir, 2011. "Web-enabled supply chain management: Key antecedents and performance impacts," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 533-545.
    15. Li Bai & F. Javier Sendra Garcia & Arunodaya Raj Mishra, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Adoption of the sustainable circular supply chain under disruptions risk in manufacturing industry using an integrated fuzzy decision-making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 743-759, December.
    16. Li, Miaomiao & Cao, Guikun & Cui, Li & Liu, Xiaoquan & Dai, Jing, 2023. "Examining how government subsidies influence firms’ circular supply chain management: The role of eco-innovation and top management team," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    17. Fernando E. Garcia-Muiña & Rocío González-Sánchez & Anna Maria Ferrari & Lucrezia Volpi & Martina Pini & Cristina Siligardi & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2019. "Identifying the Equilibrium Point between Sustainability Goals and Circular Economy Practices in an Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Context Using Eco-Design," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Bhavesh Kumar & Love Kumar & Avinash Kumar & Ramna Kumari & Uroosa Tagar & Claudio Sassanelli, 2024. "Green finance in circular economy: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16419-16459, July.
    19. Leonora Charlotte Malabi Eberhardt & Anne van Stijn & Freja Nygaard Rasmussen & Morten Birkved & Harpa Birgisdottir, 2020. "Development of a Life Cycle Assessment Allocation Approach for Circular Economy in the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Marta Mańkowska & Izabela Kotowska & Michał Pluciński, 2020. "Seaports as Nodal Points of Circular Supply Chains: Opportunities and Challenges for Secondary Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:23:y:2023:p:413-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davor Dujak,PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.