IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v6y2021i1p33-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Factors And Investment Decisions In The Nigeria Capital Market

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Ikavbo Evbayiro-Osagie

    (Department of Banking and Finance, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Benin, Benin-City, Nigeria)

  • Michael Ify Chijuka

    (Department of Banking and Finance, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Benin, Benin-City, Nigeria)

Abstract

TThis study examines Behavioral Factors and Investment Decision Making in the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE). Thus, the research question is what are the psychological factors affecting investment decisions in the Nigerian capital market. A structured questionnaire was used in collecting data and it was able to collect data from 75 investors with the application of a convenient sampling method. Using overconfidence bias, availability bias, conservatism, and herding effect to define the most important behavioral element affecting investment decision making by investors in the Nigerian. Multiple regression analysis was used as the key methodological method for evaluating the research hypothesis, whereas the internal consistency of the questionnaire calculated from Cronbach's alpha on all variables showed values greater than 0.7 with a sufficient level of reliability. The primary beneficiary group would be the buyers on the stock market who would be educated enough about the effect of their own behavioral influences on their stock market decision making. The knowledge would be useful in making optimal investment decisions and avoiding unfavorable decisions to increase their resources. In turn, it will be helpful to policymakers and stock market regulators to help them understand the position of behavioral influences inherited in consumer decision-making and that may be associated with the need for stock market brokers to update their customer's trading practices to a higher level. The findings of this study suggest that overconfidence, availability bias, and herding impact demonstrated a positive significant relationship with NSE investment decision-making except conservatism which showed a negative relationship with investment decision-making but at 0.01 levels statistically significant. On the basis of the results, it can be generalized that the most prevalent factors affecting investor investment decision taking in NSE are overconfidence, availability bias, and herding influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Ikavbo Evbayiro-Osagie & Michael Ify Chijuka, 2021. "Psychological Factors And Investment Decisions In The Nigeria Capital Market," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 33-41, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:33-41
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/OJBE-61_fin-33-41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.47535/1991ojbe119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satish Kumar & Nisha Goyal, 2015. "Behavioural biases in investment decision making – a systematic literature review," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 88-108, February.
    2. Brad M. Barber & Terrance Odean, 2001. "Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(1), pages 261-292.
    3. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:5:p:1775-1798 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nelson Maina Waweru & Evelyne Munyoki & Enrico Uliana, 2008. "The effects of behavioural factors in investment decision-making: a survey of institutional investors operating at the Nairobi Stock Exchange," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 24-41.
    5. Nofsinger, John R. & Varma, Abhishek, 2013. "Availability, recency, and sophistication in the repurchasing behavior of retail investors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2572-2585.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    2. Weifeng Xu & Qingsong Ruan & Chang Liu, 2019. "Can the Famous University Experience of Top Managers Improve Corporate Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Poornima Gupta & Preeti Goyal, 2024. "Herding the influencers for investment decisions: millennials bust the gender stereotype," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 229-241, June.
    4. Yogita Singh & Mohd. Adil & S. M. Imamul Haque, 2023. "Personality traits and behaviour biases: the moderating role of risk-tolerance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3549-3573, August.
    5. Rajdeep Kumar Raut & Niladri Das & Ramkrishna Mishra, 2020. "Behaviour of Individual Investors in Stock Market Trading: Evidence from India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(3), pages 818-833, June.
    6. Kalugala Vidanalage Aruna Shantha, 2019. "Individual Investors’ Learning Behavior and Its Impact on Their Herd Bias: An Integrated Analysis in the Context of Stock Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Abdin, Syed Zain ul & Farooq, Omer & Sultana, Naheed & Farooq, Mariam, 2017. "The impact of heuristics on investment decision and performance: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 674-688.
    8. Maheshwari H & Anup K. Samantaray & Jyoti Ranjan Jena, 2023. "Unravelling Behavioural Biases in Individual and Institutional Investors Investment Decision- making: Intersection of Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(3), pages 275-299, December.
    9. Ritika & Nawal Kishor, 2020. "Development and validation of behavioral biases scale: a SEM approach," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 237-259, November.
    10. Li, Jianbiao & Li, Dahui & Cao, Qian & Niu, Xiaofei, 2018. "The role of regret and disappointment in the repurchase effect: Does gender matter?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 134-140.
    11. Adrià Pons & Eduard Cristobal-Fransi & Carla Vintrò & Josep Rius & Oriol Querol & Jordi Vilaplana, 2023. "An Application of the IFM Method for the Risk Assessment of Financial Instruments," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 295-315, January.
    12. Jimnee Deka & Meghna Sharma & Nishant Agarwal & Kamesh Tiwari, 2023. "Linking ESG-Investing Consciousness, Behavioral Biases, and Risk-Perception: Scale Validation with Specifics of Indian Retail Investors," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 70-91.
    13. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam, 2023. "Recency bias and the cross-section of international stock returns," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Jinesh Jain & Nidhi Walia & Simarjeet Singh & Esha Jain, 2022. "Mapping the field of behavioural biases: a literature review using bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 823-855, September.
    15. Shashank Kathpal & Asif Akhtar & Asma Zaheer & Mohd Naved Khan, 2021. "Covid-19 and heuristic biases: evidence from India," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 305-316, December.
    16. Adeel Mumtaz & Tahir Saeed & M. Ramzan, 2018. "Factors affecting investment decision-making in Pakistan stock exchange," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(04), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2020. "Behaviours In The Stock Market - An Empirical Study," OSF Preprints ypq8m, Center for Open Science.
    18. Roshani Chamalka Gunathilaka & J. M. Ruwani Fernando, 2021. "Do behavioral biases differ among institutional and individual investors?," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 61-73, June.
    19. Chhatwani, Malvika & Parija, Arpit Kumar, 2023. "Who invests in cryptocurrency? The role of overconfidence among American investors," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Berg, Joyce E. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2019. "Longshots, overconfidence and efficiency on the Iowa Electronic Market," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 271-287.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Psychological Factors; Overconfidence Bias; Availability Bias; Conservatism; Herding Effect; Investment Decision; Nigerian Stock Exchange;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:33-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.