IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v4y2019ispecialp52-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Accounting - Source Of Relevant Information In Assessing The Social Responsibility Of The Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen-Florentina Paunescu

    (Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

At present, accounting efforts have been extended to assessing the state of society and social programs, not for the satisfaction of any individual or group, but for the application of evaluation procedures in the allocation of resources to a better social welfare. In this paper we try to find the answer to the following questions: Is the accounting information relevant to the social responsibility assessment of the organization? What are the tools for measuring the degree of social responsibility achievement and what are the sources of information on which they are based? What are the characteristics and benefits of knowing and applying social accounting? The product provided by accounting is the information and, like any other product, in order to be accepted by customers, it must meet certain qualitative criteria, certain standards to satisfy the needs of the beneficiaries. Social objectives are less common in organizations' strategies, but with a rapid growth trend over the last decade, especially for large and medium-sized organizations, with these objectives referring to: pollution control, cooperation with authorities, waging and working conditions of employees, customer satisfaction through the quality, durability, flexibility and price of the products and services offered, making suppliers permanent in return for offering quality products at affordable prices and upon the agreed deadlines.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen-Florentina Paunescu, 2019. "Social Accounting - Source Of Relevant Information In Assessing The Social Responsibility Of The Organization," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(Special), pages 52-59, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:4:y:2019:i:special:p:52-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/OJBE_vol-4special-52-59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Man & Maria Macris, 2015. "Integration Of Corporative Governance Into Organisation’S Social Responsibility System," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 11(2), pages 100-114, June.
    2. Nuttaneeya Torugsa & Wayne O’Donohue & Rob Hecker, 2012. "Capabilities, Proactive CSR and Financial Performance in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from an Australian Manufacturing Industry Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(4), pages 483-500, September.
    3. Mariana Man & Maria Ciurea, 2016. "Transparency of Accounting Information in Achieving Good Corporate Governance. True View and Fair Value," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 3(1), pages 41-62, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleonora Cardillo & Maria Cristina Longo, 2020. "Managerial Reporting Tools for Social Sustainability: Insights from a Local Government Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciurea Maria & Man Mariana, 2018. "The Possibility of Developing an Appropriate Framework for Reflecting Information and Making Decisions on the Human Capital," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 234-239, December.
    2. Mariana Man & Maria Ciurea, 2016. "Elements of Corporate Governance Implementation in Romania, in the European Context," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 151-166.
    3. Ciurea Maria, 2018. "The Costs of the Professional Training at the Level of the Economic Entities: Long-Term Investment or Expense?," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 228-233, December.
    4. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    5. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    6. Gu, Leilei & Liu, Zhongyang & Xu, Danyang, 2023. "The risk-mitigating role of corporate social responsibility in Chinese listed heavy-polluting companies: An extreme event experience perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Simone Pizzi, 2018. "The Relationship between Non-financial Reporting, Environmental Strategies and Financial Performance. Empirical Evidence from Milano Stock Exchange," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-9, November.
    8. Tanveer Bagh & Muhammad Asif Khan & Tahir Azad & Shamila Saddique & Muhammad Atif Khan, 2017. "The Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms' Financial Performance: Evidence from Financial Sector of Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 301-308.
    9. Tong, Xun & Chen, Jianghang & Zhu, Qinghua & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Technical assistance, inspection regime, and corporate social responsibility performance: A behavioural perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 59-69.
    10. Mira Susanti Amirrudin & Mazni Abdullah & Nooraslinda Abdul Aris & Nor Farizal Mohammed, 2019. "Are SMEs Ready for Integrated Reporting? The Malaysian Experience of Accountability," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 301-312, August.
    11. Shilong Wei & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & József Popp, 2021. "An Examination to Explain the Mechanism of Employees’ Environment-Specific Behavior through CSR and Work Engagement from the Perspective of Stewardship Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Jifan Hu & Yeyao Tang & Na Yin & Xiang Guo, 2024. "Institutional Investor Information Competition and Accounting Information Transparency: Implications for Financial Markets and Corporate Governance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9629-9666, June.
    13. Qianqian Hu & Tianlun Zhu & Chien-Liang Lin & Tiejun Chen & Tachia Chin, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in China’s Manufacturing: A Global Perspective of Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. ION Elena Iuliana & MAN Mariana, 2017. "Assessment Of The Company'S Performance In Terms Of Gains And Losses From Revaluation Of Fixed Assets Recorded In Equity," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 69(2), pages 98-108, August.
    15. María del Mar Miras‐Rodríguez & Amalia Carrasco‐Gallego & Bernabé Escobar‐Pérez, 2015. "Are Socially Responsible Behaviors Paid Off Equally? A Cross‐cultural Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 237-256, July.
    16. Valery Chistov & Nekane Aramburu & María Eugenia Fabra Florit & Iñaki Peña‐Legazkue & Pauline Weritz, 2023. "Sustainability orientation and firm growth as ventures mature," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5314-5331, December.
    17. Dayuan Li & Linna Xin & Xiaohong Chen & Shenggang Ren, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility, media attention and firm value: empirical research on Chinese manufacturing firms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1563-1577, July.
    18. Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Asif, Muhammad & Montabon, Frank & Chatha, Kamran Ali, 2020. "The indirect effect of social responsibility standards on organizational performance in apparel supply chains: A developing country perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Mitchell, J. Robert & Israelsen, Trevor L. & Mitchell, Ronald K. & Lim, Dominic S.K., 2021. "Stakeholder identification as entrepreneurial action: The social process of stakeholder enrollment in new venture emergence," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    20. Nazim Hussain, 2015. "Impact of Sustainability Performance on Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Global Fortune (N100) Firms," Working Papers 1, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate social responsibility; accounting information; social accounting; social accounting matrix.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:4:y:2019:i:special:p:52-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tomina SAVEANU to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.