IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2021i1p251-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventory Decision In Vuca World Using Economic Logic Quantity

Author

Listed:
  • Lidia Vesa

    (Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Romania)

  • Marcel Ioan Boloş

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Oradea, Romania)

  • Claudia Diana Sabău-Popa

    (University of Oradea, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

If ever the concept "VUCA" (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity) seemed appropriate to use, it is now. National and global companies experience the highest level of instability due to the Covid-19 pandemic, which is the classic example of a highly volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous world. In this world, decision-makers have to face more challenges appealing to the VUCA Prime leadership approach: vision against volatility, understanding against uncertainty, clarity against complexity, and agility against ambiguity. Some of the ways through which managers can overcome the VUCA characteristics include: providing a shared vision as a criterion for all decisions to be made, identifying the reason for the decision problems and sharing the idea with the followers, going through the entire decision process, following steps in proper order, and developing quick solutions. In an inventory decision taken in a VUCA context, the above ways are possible if using fuzzy inventory methods dealing with volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. This paper aims to adapt a traditional inventory method, Economic Production Quantity (EPQ), to the challenges of the VUCA world, through the fuzzy logic system (FLS). To achieve the best solution for the decision problem in the shortest time possible, the managers can employ a conversion by using the computing platform MATLAB. There are some advantages of this conversion for these two methods, EPQ and FLS. Firstly, the transformation of EPQ in ELQ (Economic Logic Quantity) allows managers to formulate the decision problem, even if they cannot identify and measure precisely the EPQ parameters. Secondly, using FLS to solve ELQ provides the possibility to simulate more alternatives and generate the solution in the shortest amount of time. Thirdly, it allows the decision-makers to evaluate the impact of the solution provided by each simulation on the company's performance. Using these methods has the following primary limit: the problem formulation step depends on the managers' understanding ability and managing a large volume of information. Therefore, there may be a risk of obtaining a relevant solution for a decision problem if the decision-makers do not understand the cause of the problem or do not know how to organize and manage a large volume of information. This limit could be overcome by using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), but this is the topic of further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidia Vesa & Marcel Ioan Boloş & Claudia Diana Sabău-Popa, 2021. "Inventory Decision In Vuca World Using Economic Logic Quantity," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 251-267, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:251-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2021/n1/028.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Shan Huo & Chang, Shu Man, 2008. "Optimization of fuzzy production inventory model with unrepairable defective products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 887-894, June.
    2. Lee, Huey-Ming & Yao, Jing-Shing, 1998. "Economic production quantity for fuzzy demand quantity, and fuzzy production quantity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 203-211, August.
    3. Chakrabortty, Susovan & Pal, Madhumangal & Nayak, Prasun Kumar, 2013. "Intuitionistic fuzzy optimization technique for Pareto optimal solution of manufacturing inventory models with shortages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 381-387.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Patro & Mitali M. Nayak & M. Acharya, 2019. "An EOQ model for fuzzy defective rate with allowable proportionate discount," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(1), pages 191-215, March.
    2. Javad Sadeghi & Seyed Taghi Akhavan Niaki & Mohammad Reza Malekian & Saeid Sadeghi, 2016. "Optimising multi-item economic production quantity model with trapezoidal fuzzy demand and backordering: two tuned meta-heuristics," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 170-195.
    3. Ouyang, Yao & Pedrycz, Witold, 2016. "A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 677-682.
    4. Roy, Arindam & kar, Samarjit & Maiti, Manoranjan, 2010. "A volume flexible production-policy for randomly deteriorating item with trended demand and shortages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 188-199, November.
    5. Chang, Ping-Teng & Yao, Ming-Jong & Huang, Shih-Fen & Chen, Chia-Tsung, 2006. "A genetic algorithm for solving a fuzzy economic lot-size scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 265-288, August.
    6. Rong, M. & Mahapatra, N.K. & Maiti, M., 2008. "A two warehouse inventory model for a deteriorating item with partially/fully backlogged shortage and fuzzy lead time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 59-75, August.
    7. Chang, Hung-Chi & Yao, Jing-Shing & Ouyang, Liang-Yuh, 2006. "Fuzzy mixture inventory model involving fuzzy random variable lead time demand and fuzzy total demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 65-80, February.
    8. Irfan Ali & Srikant Gupta & Aquil Ahmed, 2019. "Multi-objective linear fractional inventory problem under intuitionistic fuzzy environment," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(2), pages 173-189, April.
    9. Chen, Shan Huo & Chang, Shu Man, 2008. "Optimization of fuzzy production inventory model with unrepairable defective products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 887-894, June.
    10. Shih-Pin Chen & Wen-Lung Huang, 2014. "Solving Fuzzy Multiproduct Aggregate Production Planning Problems Based on Extension Principle," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-18, August.
    11. Yao, Jing-Shing & Chiang, Jershan, 2003. "Inventory without backorder with fuzzy total cost and fuzzy storing cost defuzzified by centroid and signed distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 401-409, July.
    12. Yao, Jing-Shing & Su, Jin-Shieh, 2000. "Fuzzy inventory with backorder for fuzzy total demand based on interval-valued fuzzy set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 390-408, July.
    13. Lau, H.C.W. & Ho, G.T.S. & Zhao, Y. & Chung, N.S.H., 2009. "Development of a process mining system for supporting knowledge discovery in a supply chain network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 176-187, November.
    14. Björk, Kaj-Mikael, 2012. "A multi-item fuzzy economic production quantity problem with a finite production rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 702-707.
    15. Wong, Bo K. & Lai, Vincent S., 2011. "A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management: 1998-2009," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 157-168, January.
    16. Amalesh Kumar Manna & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & Jayanta Kumar Dey & Shyamal Kumar Mondal & Ali Akbar Shaikh & Armando Céspedes-Mota & Gerardo Treviño-Garza, 2022. "A Fuzzy Imperfect Production Inventory Model Based on Fuzzy Differential and Fuzzy Integral Method," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Tomasz Korol & Anestis Fotiadis, 2016. "Applying Fuzzy Logic of Expert Knowledge for Accurate Predictive Algorithms of Customer Traffic Flows in Theme Parks," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1451-1468, November.
    18. Mandeep Mittal & Vibhor Jain & Jayanti Tripathi Pandey & Muskan Jain & Himani Dem, 2023. "Optimizing Inventory Management: A Comprehensive Analysis of Models Integrating Diverse Fuzzy Demand Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Xie, Ying & Petrovic, Dobrila & Burnham, Keith, 2006. "A heuristic procedure for the two-level control of serial supply chains under fuzzy customer demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 37-50, July.
    20. Chen, Shih-Pin & Ho, Yann-Horng, 2011. "Analysis of the newsboy problem with fuzzy demands and incremental discounts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 169-177, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fuzzy logic system; economic production quantity; demand; cost; fuzzy inference; fuzzification; defuzzification;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • C87 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Econometric Software
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:251-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.