IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v56y2019i1d10.1007_s12597-018-00352-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An EOQ model for fuzzy defective rate with allowable proportionate discount

Author

Listed:
  • R. Patro

    (Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University)

  • Mitali M. Nayak

    (Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University)

  • M. Acharya

    (Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University)

Abstract

In this paper, we developed both crisp and fuzzy EOQ models with proportionate discount (discount increases when number of defects decrease in each lot) for items with imperfect quality. First, we construct an optimal order quantity of crisp case. Next, proposed three different fuzzy inventory models where in the first case the defective rate is fuzzified, in the next case, both defective rate and annual demand rate are fuzzified and finally in the case of the third model all costs, defective rate and annual demand are taken to be fuzzy. Lastly, we developed the model for items with imperfect quality with inspection errors, as the inspector may commit errors while screening the lot. The probability of misclassification errors is assumed to be known. The inspection process may consist of three costs: (a) cost of inspection (b) cost of Type I errors and (c) cost of Type II errors. The defective items, classified by the inspector and the buyer, would be salvaged as a single batch that is sold at a discounted price. The objective is to find the optimal lot size for models to maximize the total profit (both for crisp and fuzzy models) and used fuzzy numbers for defective items, demand rate and/or all types of costs (exclusively for fuzzy models). We considered the triangular fuzzy numbers to represent the fuzziness of all types of costs, defective items and annual demand. Finally, the optimum order quantity is obtained using the signed distance method. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the results of the proposed models and the sensitivity analysis is conducted to know the effect of changes made for the values of different parameters on the actual lot size and the profit respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Patro & Mitali M. Nayak & M. Acharya, 2019. "An EOQ model for fuzzy defective rate with allowable proportionate discount," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(1), pages 191-215, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-018-00352-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-018-00352-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-018-00352-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-018-00352-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S O Duffuaa & M Khan, 2002. "An optimal repeat inspection plan with several classifications," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(9), pages 1016-1026, September.
    2. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    3. Chen, Shan Huo & Chang, Shu Man, 2008. "Optimization of fuzzy production inventory model with unrepairable defective products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 887-894, June.
    4. Khan, M. & Jaber, M.Y. & Wahab, M.I.M., 2010. "Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 87-96, March.
    5. Hyun Kim, Chang & Hong, Yushin, 1999. "An optimal production run length in deteriorating production processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 183-189, January.
    6. Yao, Jing-Shing & Chiang, Jershan, 2003. "Inventory without backorder with fuzzy total cost and fuzzy storing cost defuzzified by centroid and signed distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 401-409, July.
    7. Lee, Huey-Ming & Yao, Jing-Shing, 1998. "Economic production quantity for fuzzy demand quantity, and fuzzy production quantity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 203-211, August.
    8. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    9. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    10. P. K. De & Apurva Rawat, 2011. "A fuzzy inventory model without shortages using triangular fuzzy number," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 59-68, March.
    11. K.A. Halim & B.C. Giri & K.S. Chaudhuri, 2008. "Fuzzy Economic Order Quantity model for perishable items with stochastic demand, partial backlogging and fuzzy deterioration rate," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1/2), pages 77-96.
    12. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Subhendu Ruidas & Mijanur Rahaman Seikh & Prasun Kumar Nayak, 2022. "A production-repairing inventory model considering demand and the proportion of defective items as rough intervals," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2803-2829, July.
    2. S. Rajeswari & C. Sugapriya & D. Nagarajan, 2022. "An analysis of uncertain situation and advance payment system on a double-storage fuzzy inventory model," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 20-40, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Björk, Kaj-Mikael, 2012. "A multi-item fuzzy economic production quantity problem with a finite production rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 702-707.
    2. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    3. Tapan Kumar Datta, 2017. "Inventory system with defective products and investment opportunity for reducing defective proportion," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 297-312, April.
    4. Ivan Darma Wangsa & Hui Ming Wee & Shih-Hsien Tseng, 2019. "A coordinated vendor–buyer system considering loss and damage claims, insurance cost and stochastic lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(3), pages 384-398, June.
    5. Mehmood Khan & Matloub Hussain & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2017. "Learning and screening errors in an EPQ inventory model for supply chains with stochastic lead time demands," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4816-4832, August.
    6. Aditi Khanna & Aakanksha Kishore & Biswajit Sarkar & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2018. "Supply Chain with Customer-Based Two-Level Credit Policies under an Imperfect Quality Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-35, December.
    7. Chayanika Rout & Ravi Shankar Kumar & Debjani Chakraborty & Adrijit Goswami, 2019. "An EPQ model for deteriorating items with imperfect production, inspection errors, rework and shortages : a type-2 fuzzy approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 657-688, September.
    8. Lie-Fern Hsu & Jia-Tzer Hsu, 2016. "Economic production quantity (EPQ) models under an imperfect production process with shortages backordered," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 852-867, March.
    9. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    10. Wang, Chih-Hsiung, 2005. "Integrated production and product inspection policy for a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 123-134, January.
    11. Roy, Arindam & kar, Samarjit & Maiti, Manoranjan, 2010. "A volume flexible production-policy for randomly deteriorating item with trended demand and shortages," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 188-199, November.
    12. Bimal Kumar Sett & Bikash Koli Dey & Biswajit Sarkar, 2020. "Autonomated Inspection Policy for Smart Factory—An Improved Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & María José Lea Plaza-Makowsky & María Alejandra Sevilla-Roca & José María Núñez-Baumert & Buddhadev Mandal, 2021. "An Inventory Model for Imperfect Quality Products with Rework, Distinct Holding Costs, and Nonlinear Demand Dependent on Price," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Biswajit Sarkar & Baishakhi Ganguly & Asif Iqbal Malik & Rafael Batista & Young Hae Lee, 2018. "Optimization of sample size and order size in an inventory model with quality inspection and return of defective items," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 445-467, December.
    15. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.
    16. Ahmed Abdel-Aleem & Mahmoud A. El-Sharief & Mohsen A. Hassan & Mohamed G. El-Sebaie, 2017. "A surface response optimization model for EPQ system with imperfect production process under rework and shortage," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(4), pages 735-751, December.
    17. Khan, Mehmood & Hussain, Matloub & Saber, Hussein M., 2016. "Information sharing in a sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 208-214.
    18. Javad Asadkhani & Hadi Mokhtari & Saman Tahmasebpoor, 2022. "Optimal lot-sizing under learning effect in inspection errors with different types of imperfect quality items," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2631-2665, July.
    19. Amalesh Kumar Manna & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & Jayanta Kumar Dey & Shyamal Kumar Mondal & Ali Akbar Shaikh & Armando Céspedes-Mota & Gerardo Treviño-Garza, 2022. "A Fuzzy Imperfect Production Inventory Model Based on Fuzzy Differential and Fuzzy Integral Method," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Skouri, K. & Konstantaras, I. & Lagodimos, A.G. & Papachristos, S., 2014. "An EOQ model with backorders and rejection of defective supply batches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 148-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-018-00352-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.