IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2020i2p326-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Decision Making In Influencer Marketing

Author

Listed:
  • SZIKSZAI-NÉMETH Ketrin

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Applied Economics Sciences, Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • NAGY Adrián Szilárd

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Applied Economics Sciences, Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business, Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Influencers are present in our everyday lives, we see them at events, in advertisments, TV and papers, and in their „natural habitat†: social media. It is not surprising considering that the fact that E-WOM has a stronger impact on consumer decision-making than traditional advertising techniques has been known for a long time. Moreover, advertisements are now consciously ignored by consumers, making influencer marketing an excellent alternative where the opinion leader formulates and publishes the message him- or herself. These individuals seem more approachable compared to traditional celebrities, as they provide insight into their daily lives making it easier to identify with them. Brands, in turn, can collaborate with the right influencers to create positive associations in the minds of consumers. Nowadays, consumers get the needed information about the products from social media and, as a result, make purchases, also they trust even an unknown individual’s recommendation more than brand ads. Consistent posting and the presence of socially accepted values in the posts are essential elements in influencer marketing, which must be complemented by active engagement with the followers. It may be worthwhile to start with a look at the number of the followers before starting a collaboration, but the results of the researchers came to a different conclusion. Some of them found that a large following bases does not always represent a real influencing force and it is more rewarding to focus on shared content and the brand–influencer fit. Others found that the number of followers correlated positively with consumer engagement. Interestingly however, even though followers recognize that they are encountering advertised content, they still use the information gained in their decision-making, and even a specifically urging and activating tone can encourage them to purchase. Thus authenticity plays a cruical role for both parties, and for this reason it is crucial how the product and the influencer itself is indicated in the advertised content.

Suggested Citation

  • SZIKSZAI-NÉMETH Ketrin & NAGY Adrián Szilárd, 2020. "Consumer Decision Making In Influencer Marketing," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 326-336, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:326-336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2020/n2/030.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Domicián Máté & Imran Sarihasan & Krisztina Dajnoki, 2017. "The Relations between Labour Market Institutions and Employment of Migrants," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(46), pages 806-806, August.
    2. Vida, Viktória, 2013. "Consumer attitudes and preferences about the pork meat in Hungary," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 7(4-5), pages 1-8.
    3. József Popp & Péter Balogh & Judit Oláh & Sebastian Kot & Mónika Harangi Rákos & Péter Lengyel, 2018. "Social Network Analysis of Scientific Articles Published by Food Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. KOVÁCS Edit Veronika & HARANGI-RÁKOS Mónika, 2020. "Cities Vs The Countryside €“ Pros And Cons Of Urban And Rural Life," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 530-539, July.
    2. Péter Miklós KŐMIVES & Mária HÉDER & Krisztina DAJNOKI, 2018. "Validation – A Meeting Point Between Higher Education And The Labour Market?," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 17-22, July.
    3. Juan Felipe Núñez-Espinoza & Francisco Ernesto Martínez-Castañeda & Fernando Ávila-Pérez & María Camila Rendón-Rendón, 2022. "A Structural Approach to Some Contradictions in Worldwide Swine Production and Health Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Ruifeng Gong & Jian Xue & Laijun Zhao & Oleksandra Zolotova & Xiaoqing Ji & Yan Xu, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Web of Science (WOS) Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Jan Dvorsky & József Popp & Zuzana Virglerova & Sándor Kovács & Judit Oláh, 2018. "Assessing The Importance Of Market Risk And Its Sources In Smes Of The Visegrad Group And Serbia," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 22(1), pages 230-255, December.
    6. Ardit Sertolli & Zoltán Gabnai & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2022. "Biomass Potential and Utilization in Worldwide Research Trends—A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Mónika Harangi-Rákos & Christa Pfau & Éva Bácsné Bába & Bence András Bács & Péter Miklós Kőmíves, 2022. "Lockdowns and Physical Activities: Sports in the Time of COVID," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Xia Sun & Juan Chen & Shenghua Xie, 2022. "Becoming Urban Citizens: A Three-Phase Perspective on the Social Integration of Rural–Urban Migrants in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Sandile Birthwell Ndwandwe & Ruey-Chee Weng, 2018. "Competitive Analyses of the Pig Industry in Swaziland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Marwa Ben Abdallah & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zoltan Lakner, 2021. "Exploring the Link between Food Security and Food Price Dynamics: A Bibliometric Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Golder, Su & McCambridge, Jim, 2021. "Alcohol, cardiovascular disease and industry funding: A co-authorship network analysis of systematic reviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    12. Daniel Juravle & Edina Erdei & Gyorgy Kossa & Sándor Kovacs & Jozsef Popp & Judit Olah, 2022. "Examining the Correlations Between Industry 4.0 Assets, External and Internal Risk Factors and Business Performance Among Hungarian Food Companies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(59), pages 143-143.
    13. Yanne Yuniarti Widayat & Nina Karlina & Mas Dadang Enjat Munajat & Sinta Ningrum, 2023. "Mapping Policy Actors Using Social Network Analysis on Integrated Urban Farming Program in Bandung City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Decision making; Advertising; Influencer marketing; Personal branding;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2020:i:2:p:326-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.