IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nup/jrmdke/v5y2017i3439-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eastern Partnership Integration with the EU and Inclusive Growth of National Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Eka SEPASHVILI

    (Tbilisi State University)

Abstract

The paper aims at analyzing the circumstances and objectives of the regional integration in the context of global development. The EU is one of the most influential and important actors of the global world, which represents one of the most developed examples of the regional integration. During the development, the EU went through the several stages on enlargement. Even nowadays, without having targeted to the reactive new member in foreseen future, the EU continues the process of integration of adjacent regions by setting goals and priorities through different forms such as the European Neighborhood, the Eastern Partnership, Association Agreements, various types of Trade agreements. The Eastern Partnership which represents the EU’s eastern neighborhood consisting by former soviet republics has steadily gone up with integration: 1. Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine have already signed the Association Agreement (AA) including Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs) with the EU and now these countries work on further progress in terms of the Implementation of AA/DCFTA; 2. Armenia and Azerbaijan are seeking new framework to up-grade their relationship with the EU, Belarus created EU Belarus Co-ordination Group and acts within the Single Support Framework program for 2017-2020. The evolution of EaP countries’ trade data evidently show the changes and growing dynamics in the region. The obvious increasing tendency of trade volumes predicts for further success in the future after the DC FTAs are enacted fully for some countries and/or other trade facilitation measures are utilized fully for others. A new approach to the economic growth also suggests that benefit from economic growth supports poverty reduction, widely spreads across sectors and affects the majority of the labor force and hence, rise the welfare of the population. In this context, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) appears to be a useful tool to achieve this overwhelming goal. In the difficult business climate prevailing in most of the EaP countries, the role of the EU support could include raising awareness on CSR and supporting the implementation of relevant standards in the enterprises that are benefiting from the EU assistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Eka SEPASHVILI, 2017. "Eastern Partnership Integration with the EU and Inclusive Growth of National Economies," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 439-453, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:5:y:2017:i:3:439-453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/download/225/186
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/225/186
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrizia Gazzola & Gianluca Colombo & Roberta Pezzetti & Luminița Nicolescu, 2017. "Consumer Empowerment in the Digital Economy: Availing Sustainable Purchasing Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Joana Carmo Dias, 2023. "The New Digital Economy and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Patrizia Gazzola & Elena‐Mădălina Vătămănescu & Andreia Gabriela Andrei & Chiara Marrapodi, 2019. "Users' motivations to participate in the sharing economy: Moving from profits toward sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 741-751, July.
    3. Song, Yunxing & Gong, Yuanyuan & Song, Yan & Chen, Xiaohui, 2024. "Exploring the impact of digital inclusive finance on consumption volatility: Insights from household entrepreneurship and income volatility," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Florina Pînzaru & Paul Dobrescu & Alexandra Vițelar & Ion Moldoveanu & Adina Săniuță, 2023. "Linking Sustainability-Driven Factors and Online Knowledge Sharing in Business: A PLS-SEM Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Elena-Madalina Vatamanescu & Vlad-Andrei Alexandru & Georgiana Cristea & Loredana Radu & Oana Chirica, 2018. "A Demand-Side Perspective of Bioeconomy: The Influence of Online Intellectual Capital on Consumption," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 536-536, August.
    6. Florin-Alexandru Luca & Claudia-Ioana Ciobanu & Andreia Gabriela Andrei & Adrian V. Horodnic, 2018. "Raising Awareness on Health Impact of the Chemicals Used in Consumer Products: Empirical Evidence from East-Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Patrizia Gazzola & Enrica Pavione & Arianna Barge & Franco Fassio, 2023. "Using the Transparency of Supply Chain Powered by Blockchain to Improve Sustainability Relationships with Stakeholders in the Food Sector: The Case Study of Lavazza," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Sabrina Helm & Brintha Subramaniam, 2019. "Exploring Socio-Cognitive Mindfulness in the Context of Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Alaa Eddine El Moussaoui & Brahim Benbba & Anicia Jaegler & Taoufiq El Moussaoui & Zineb El Andaloussi & Loqman Chakir, 2023. "Consumer Perceptions of Online Shopping and Willingness to Use Pick-Up Points: A Case Study of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh & Sunčana Slijepčević & Bruno Škrinjarić, 2021. "Conceptual Research Framework of Consumer Resilience to Privacy Violation Online," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Ping Dong & Yuteng Zhu & Shengsen Duan & Minling Wu & Jiangdong Bao, 2023. "How Does the Digital Economy Promote a Culture of Business Innovation? A Study Based on Human Capital Allocation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Ping Chen, 2023. "The Effect of Value Creation on Startups Performance in the Digital Environment: Evidence from Chinese Digital Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Piero Mella & Michela Pellicelli, 2017. "How Myopia Archetypes Lead to Non-Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Zhu, Mingxun & Wang, Yanping & Wei, Min & Cai, Zhen, 2023. "How does digital finance affect consumer online shopping: A comprehensive analysis based on econometric model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Willard Munyoka, 2022. "Inclusive Digital Innovation in South Africa: Perspectives from Disadvantaged and Marginalized Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Patrizia Gazzola & Enrica Pavione & Daniele Grechi & Paola Ossola, 2018. "Cycle Tourism as a Driver for the Sustainable Development of Little-Known or Remote Territories: The Experience of the Apennine Regions of Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    17. M.A. Afonasova & E.E. Panfilova & M.A. Galichkina, 2018. "Social and Economic Background of Digital Economy: Conditions for Transition," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 292-302.
    18. Giuseppe T. Cirella & Anatoliy G. Goncharuk & Corrado lo Storto & Alessio Russo, 2020. "Exploring Social Sustainability and Economic Practices: Multi-Journal Compendium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-7, February.
    19. Kannan, Devika, 2021. "Sustainable procurement drivers for extended multi-tier context: A multi-theoretical perspective in the Danish supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    20. Giachino, Chiara & Pattanaro, Giulio & Bertoldi, Bernardo & Bollani, Luigi & Bonadonna, Alessandro, 2021. "Nature-based solutions and their potential to attract the young generations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:5:y:2017:i:3:439-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian-Mihai VIDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmsnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.