IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nsr/niesra/i10y2023p3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foreward

Author

Listed:
  • Chadha, Jagjit S.

Abstract

The British economy is suffering from a sequence of bleak shocks in its capacity to produce goods and services. These started with the financial crisis, which although international, particularly affected an economy focused on financial services. It continued with the management of the exit from the European Union, which festered and ran like a sore through economic policy. The impact of the pandemic was amplified in an economy so heavily concentrated on the hospitality sector. And as a trading nation reliant on energy and intermediate goods imports, the supply chain disruptions and Russian invasion of Ukraine further exposed the economy to a deterioration in its supply capacity. This fall in productive capacity has left us with one of two options, we accept that on average as a nation we are poorer or, to maintain our level of income, we must increase the hours we work. To be clear these are not the direct concern of monetary policy, which must simply decide following these inflation shocks at what rate to disinflate. These shocks have meant that much of what we buy, which is priced in overseas currency, has gone up sharply in price. The terms of our overseas trade have turned against us and this means that we have to give up more of our production for imports. The sharp increase in traded prices has meant, as with most major central banks, the Bank of England has raised its policy rate rapidly. This is to ensure that the supply shocks do not lead to chronic inflationary pressure. The increase in interest rates has two obvious objectives: first to ensure that once the temporary inflation has abated wage and price setters condition their future rounds of decision making on inflation expectations that are consistent with price stability and second to ensure that demand is brought down in line with a lower level of capacity than was previously thought to be the case. There is though another aspect of the Bank's strategy that is often overlooked. While it is probably true that an earlier response from the Bank might have shaved a percentage point or two off the peak in inflation, the pattern would have been much the same. It is also the case that had a considerably stronger interest rate response been adopted in late 2021 and 2022, it might have stamped on inflation more forcefully, but only by threatening a surge in unemployment and financial disruption in, as we now know, rather febrile markets. The substantive risk of a subsequent deflation was very real. And, following so soon from the tragedy of COVID, that would not have been the right response. The regime change from easy money to normalisation and a shrinkage in the central bank balance sheet, although long heralded, represents a regime shift that ought to be handled with great care. And that is where policy at the other side of town comes in. Double digit inflation is not an outcome anyone wanted, and it is imposing genuine hardship on many families towards the bottom of the income distribution. We have consistently maintained however that it is up to the Treasury, not the Bank of England, to offset the distributional consequences by offering more targeted relief. Our own calculations, published around the time of the Spring Budget, suggested that the inflation tax – in inflating the public purse–has created more than enough fiscal space to support poorer families without generating further excess demand. There is another more subtle point that has been overlooked. The government, by stating a target for halving inflation this year, has inadvertently provided an unhelpful focal point for inflation at some five per cent by the year end. The previous central case was for something well below that and nearer the inflation target. People are now planning at five per cent rather than four per cent or less and this is making inflation more persistent. The government, having set the Bank of England a target for inflation along with operational independence, should not involve itself in forecasting inflation or attempt to take credit for an imminent fall in inflation. Recall that the 'control of inflation' job, which involves forecasting and deploying instruments of the open market and open mouth kind, was handed over to the Bank in May 1997. This year the government has itself made the Bank's job harder by saying it will get inflation down. The chairman, having picked the manager, should not try to take any last-minute penalties. The question then is: if he does take that penalty, is it a case of bad luck when he misses?

Suggested Citation

  • Chadha, Jagjit S., 2023. "Foreward," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 10, pages 1-3.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesra:i:10:y:2023:p:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.niesr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Spring-2023-UK-Economic-Outlook.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hantzsche, Arno & Young, Garry, 2019. "The Economic Impact of Prime Minister Johnson's New Brexit Deal," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 250, pages 34-37, November.
    2. Hantzsche, Arno & Young, Garry, 2020. "Prospects For The Uk Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 251, pages 4-34, February.
    3. Sensier, Marianne & Devine, Fiona, 2020. "Understanding Regional Economic Performance And Resilience In The Uk: Trends Since The Global Financial Crisis," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 253, pages 18-28, August.
    4. Christina Beatty & Stephen Fothergill, 2004. "Economic Change and the Labour Market in Britain's Seaside Towns," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 459-478.
    5. David G. Blanchflower & Adam S. Posen, 2014. "Wages and Labor Market Slack: Making the Dual Mandate Operational," Working Paper Series WP14-6, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    6. Natalia Bailey & Sean Holly & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2016. "A Two‐Stage Approach to Spatio‐Temporal Analysis with Strong and Weak Cross‐Sectional Dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 249-280, January.
    7. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Lisauskaite, Elena & Pabst, Adrian, 2021. "UK regional outlook," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(2), pages 42-57.
    8. Sungyup Chung & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 2015. "Competitive and Complementary Relationship between Regional Economies: A Study of the Great Lake States," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 205-229, June.
    9. David G. Blanchflower & Adam S. Posen, 2014. "Wages and Labor Market Slack: Making the Dual Mandate Operational (DRAFT)," Policy Briefs PB14-10, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    10. Hantzsche, Arno & Young, Garry, 2019. "Prospects for the UK Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 250, pages 4-33, November.
    11. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Lisauskaite, Elena, 2021. "UK regional outlook," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(1), pages 24-33, February.
    12. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Pabst, Adrian & Mosley, Max & Szendrei, Tibor, 2022. "UK Regional Outlook: Autumn 2021," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(5 Winter), pages 29-40.
    13. Lenoël, Cyrille & Macqueen, Rory & Young, Garry, 2020. "Prospects For The Uk Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 253, pages 4-34, August.
    14. van de Ven, Justin, 2017. "SIDD: An adaptable framework for analysing the distributional implications of policy alternatives where savings and employment decisions matter," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 161-174.
    15. Lenoël, Cyrille & Young, Garry, 2020. "Prospects For The Uk Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 252, pages 10-43, May.
    16. Arnab Bhattacharjee & Sean Holly, 2013. "Understanding Interactions in Social Networks and Committees," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 23-53, March.
    17. Gary Koop & Stuart McIntyre & James Mitchell & Aubrey Poon, 2020. "Regional output growth in the United Kingdom: More timely and higher frequency estimates from 1970," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 176-197, March.
    18. Koop, Gary & McIntyre, Stuart & Mitchell, James & Poon, Aubrey, 2020. "Reconciled Estimates And Nowcasts Of Regional Output In The Uk," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 253, pages 44-59, August.
    19. Verikios, George & Hurst, Ian & Young, Garry, 2020. "Assessing Long-Run Growth Prospects For The Uk’S Regions," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 254, pages 12-27, November.
    20. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Lisauskaite, Elena & Pabst, Adrian, 2021. "UK regional outlook," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(2), pages 42-57, May.
    21. Küçük, Hande & Lenoël, Cyrille & Macqueen, Rory, 2020. "Prospects For The Uk Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 254, pages 4-39, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Lisauskaite, Elena & Pabst, Adrian, 2021. "UK regional outlook," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 2, pages 42-57.
    2. Cyrille Lenoel & Young, Garry, 2021. "UK sectoral output," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 1, pages 21-23.
    3. Kucuk, Hande & Lenoel, Cyrille & MacQueen, Rory, 2021. "Brexit Britain in Covid recovery ward," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 1, pages 5-20.
    4. Niesr, 2021. "Appendix," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 1, pages 34-42.
    5. Niesr, 2021. "Overview," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 1, pages 1-4.
    6. Niesr, 2021. "Overview," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 3, pages 5-36.
    7. Niesr, 2021. "Appendix," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 3, pages 51-59.
    8. Chadha, Jagjit S., 2022. "Foreward: bridge to normality," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(1 Winter), pages 1-3.
    9. Kucuk, Hande & Lenoel, Cyrille & MacQueen, Rory, 2021. "UK sectoral output," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 2, pages 33-41.
    10. NIESR & Appendix, 2022. "Appendix," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(1 Winter), pages 45-53.
    11. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Pabst, Adrian & Mosley, Max & Szendrei, Tibor, 2022. "UK Regional Outlook: Autumn 2021," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(1 Winter), pages 29-40.
    12. Vijay Victor & Joshy Joseph Karakunnel & Swetha Loganathan & Daniel Francois Meyer, 2021. "From a Recession to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Inflation–Unemployment Comparison between the UK and India," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Mortimer-Lee, Paul & Patel, Urvish, 2022. "Box C: Gas prices and price controls," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(1 Winter), pages 24-26.
    14. Kucuk, Hande & Lenoel, Cyrille & MacQueen, Rory, 2021. "Brisk but not better growth," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 2, pages 5-32.
    15. Niesr, 2021. "Overview," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 2, pages 1-4.
    16. Brian Bell & Mihai Codreanu & Stephen Machin, 2020. "What can previous recessions tell us about the Covid-19 downturn?," CEP Covid-19 Analyses cepcovid-19-007, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    17. Niesr, 2021. "Appendix," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 2, pages 58-66.
    18. Marine Charlotte André & Meixing Dai, 2019. "Le Brexit : quelles conséquences sur les économies britannique et de l’Union européenne ?," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 40(1), pages 11-18, July.
    19. Niesr, 2022. "Overview," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(1 Winter), pages 1-4.
    20. Mortimer-Lee, Paul, 2022. "Box A: Improved trade balance with the European Union raises challenging Brexit questions," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(1 Winter), pages 7-10.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesra:i:10:y:2023:p:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.