IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/untern/10.5771-0042-059x-2015-4-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

It’s a consumer’s idea, you must like it: The efficacy of created-by-consumer cues in market communication

Author

Listed:
  • Stock, Carolin
  • Gierl, Heribert

Abstract

An increasing number of companies use the fact that the ideas for their new products are consumer-generated for communication purposes to affect purchase intentions. Prior research has found that the effectiveness of this measure is limited to products with low complexity and low potential to affect the social status of their users. We consider two additional factors that might restrict the effectiveness of created-by-consumer cues: product typicality and the presence of cues that indicate similarities between the consumers whom the company wants to buy the product and the consumer who created the idea for the product. Low product typicality was determined to be an important condition for the effectiveness of created-by-consumer cues.

Suggested Citation

  • Stock, Carolin & Gierl, Heribert, 2015. "It’s a consumer’s idea, you must like it: The efficacy of created-by-consumer cues in market communication," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(4), pages 371-395.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2015-4-371
    DOI: 10.5771/0042-059X-2015-4-371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0042-059X-2015-4-371
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0042-059X-2015-4-371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikolaus Franke & Marion K. Poetz & Martin Schreier, 2014. "Integrating Problem Solvers from Analogous Markets in New Product Ideation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 1063-1081, April.
    2. Broniarczyk, Susan M & Alba, Joseph W, 1994. "The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 393-407, December.
    3. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    4. Nishikawa, Hidehiko & Schreier, Martin & Ogawa, Susumu, 2013. "User-generated versus designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 160-167.
    5. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. "Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    6. Rao, Akshay R & Monroe, Kent B, 1988. "The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 253-264, September.
    7. C. Page Moreau & Kelly B. Herd, 2010. "To Each His Own? How Comparisons with Others Influence Consumers' Evaluations of Their Self-Designed Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 806-819, February.
    8. Pechmann, Cornelia & Ratneshwar, S, 1992. "Consumer Covariation Judgments: Theory or Data Driven?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 373-386, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Garim & Kim, Hye-Young, 2024. "Human vs. AI: The battle for authenticity in fashion design and consumer response," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Haverila, Matti, 2011. "Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 238-246.
    3. Darren W. Dahl & Christoph Fuchs & Martin Schreier, 2015. "Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1978-1988, August.
    4. Fabrice Larceneux & Florence Benoît-Moreau & Valérie Renaudin, 2012. "Why Might Organic Labels Fail to Influence Consumer Choices? Marginal Labelling and Brand Equity Effects," Post-Print hal-00656485, HAL.
    5. Heribert Gierl & Julia Koncz, 2007. "Unternehmenswachstum und Internationalität als Qualitätssignale," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 389-409, January.
    6. Ujwal Kayande & John H. Roberts & Gary L. Lilien & Duncan K. H. Fong, 2007. "Mapping the Bounds of Incoherence: How Far Can You Go and How Does It Affect Your Brand?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 504-513, 07-08.
    7. Becker-Olsen, Karen L. & Cudmore, B. Andrew & Hill, Ronald Paul, 2006. "The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 46-53, January.
    8. Fabrice Larceneux & Florence Benoit-Moreau & Valérie Renaudin, 2012. "Why Might Organic Labels Fail to Influence Consumer Choices? Marginal Labelling and Brand Equity Effects," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 85-104, March.
    9. Jorge Mejia & Anandasivam Gopal & Michael Trusov, 2020. "Deal or No Deal? Online Deals, Retailer Heterogeneity, and Brand Evaluations in a Competitive Environment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1087-1106, December.
    10. Desai, Kalpesh Kaushik & Mahajan, Vijay, 1998. "Strategic Role of Affect-Based Attitudes in the Acquisition, Development, and Retention of Customers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 309-324, July.
    11. Heribert Gierl & Armin Stich, 1999. "Sicherheitswert und Vorhersagewert von Qualitätssignalen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 5-32, January.
    12. Vlaev, Ivo & Chater, Nick & Lewis, Rich & Davies, Greg, 2009. "Reason-based judgments: Using reasons to decouple perceived price-quality correlation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 721-731, October.
    13. W. Verbeke & I. Vermeir & Z. Pieniak & K. Brunsø, 2005. "Consumers’ quality perception as a basis for fish market segmentation in Belgium," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/351, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    14. Folse, Judith Anne Garretson & Niedrich, Ronald W. & Grau, Stacy Landreth, 2010. "Cause-Relating Marketing: The Effects of Purchase Quantity and Firm Donation Amount on Consumer Inferences and Participation Intentions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 295-309.
    15. Sharma, Arun, 2001. "Consumer decision-making, salespeople's adaptive selling and retail performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 125-129, November.
    16. Eun Lee & Chan Park, 2015. "Does advertising exposure prior to customer satisfaction survey enhance customer satisfaction ratings?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 513-523, December.
    17. Qiong Wang & Ujwal Kayande & Sandy Jap, 2010. "The Seeds of Dissolution: Discrepancy and Incoherence in Buyer-Supplier Exchange," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1109-1124, 11-12.
    18. Snelders, Dirk & Schoormans, Jan P. L., 2004. "An exploratory study of the relation between concrete and abstract product attributes," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 803-820, December.
    19. Gillespie, Brian & Muehling, Darrel D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2018. "Fitting product placements: Affective fit and cognitive fit as determinants of consumer evaluations of placed brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 90-102.
    20. Rachel Esther Lim & Wei‐Na Lee, 2023. "Communicating corporate social responsibility: How fit, specificity, and cognitive fluency drive consumer skepticism and response," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 955-967, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:untern:10.5771/0042-059x-2015-4-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.