IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v581y2020i7806d10.1038_d41586-020-01248-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whose coronavirus strategy worked best? Scientists hunt most effective policies

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Gibney

Abstract

Researchers sift through data to compare nations’ vastly different containment measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Gibney, 2020. "Whose coronavirus strategy worked best? Scientists hunt most effective policies," Nature, Nature, vol. 581(7806), pages 15-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:581:y:2020:i:7806:d:10.1038_d41586-020-01248-1
    DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-01248-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01248-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/d41586-020-01248-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cindy Cheng & Joan Barcelo & Allison Spencer Hartnett & Robert Kubinec & Luca Messerschmidt, 2020. "CoronaNet: A Dyadic Dataset of Government Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Working Papers 20200042, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Apr 2020.
    2. Enzo Cumbo & Giuseppe Gallina & Pietro Messina & Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina, 2023. "Filter Masks during the Second Phase of SARS-CoV-2: Study on Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Serge Blondel & Radu Vranceanu, 2020. "COVID-19 mortality and health expenditures across European countries: the positive correlation puzzle," Working Papers hal-02920258, HAL.
    4. Robert J. R. Elliott & Ingmar Schumacher & Cees Withagen, 2020. "Suggestions for a Covid-19 Post-Pandemic Research Agenda in Environmental Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1187-1213, August.
    5. Theologos Dergiades & Costas Milas & Elias Mossialos & Theodore Panagiotidis, 2021. "Effectiveness of Government Policies in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak," Discussion Paper Series 2021_05, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Feb 2021.
    6. Greer, Scott L. & Rozenblum, Sarah & Falkenbach, Michelle & Löblová, Olga & Jarman, Holly & Williams, Noah & Wismar, Matthias, 2022. "Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 408-417.
    7. Maria Petrescu & Anjala S. Krishen, 2020. "The importance of high-quality data and analytics during the pandemic," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 43-44, June.
    8. Kim E. Van Oorschot & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Marianne Jahre, 2023. "Collaboration–competition dilemma in flattening the COVID‐19 curve," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1345-1361, May.
    9. Andy Hong & Sandip Chakrabarti, 2023. "Compact living or policy inaction? Effects of urban density and lockdown on the COVID-19 outbreak in the US," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1588-1609, July.
    10. Christos Livas & Konstantina Delli, 2021. "Comment on Sycinska-Dziarnowska et al. The Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Interest in Orthodontic Treatment and Perspectives for the Future. Real-Time Surveillance Using Google Trends. I," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-2, December.
    11. Lee, Kang-Bok & Han, Sumin & Jeong, Yeasung, 2020. "COVID-19, flattening the curve, and Benford’s law," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    12. Young Jun Choi & Stefan Kühner & Shih-Jiunn Shi, 2022. "From “new social risks” to “COVID social risks”: the challenges for inclusive society in South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan amid the pandemic [Asian development outlook 2021 update]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 260-274.
    13. Zhang, Junyi & Zhang, Runsen & Ding, Hongxiang & Li, Shuangjin & Liu, Rui & Ma, Shuang & Zhai, Baoxin & Kashima, Saori & Hayashi, Yoshitsugu, 2021. "Effects of transport-related COVID-19 policy measures: A case study of six developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 37-57.
    14. Tuyet-Anh T. Le & Kelly Vodden & Jianghua Wu & Ghada Atiwesh, 2021. "Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-32, January.
    15. Wehner, Joachim & Hallerberg, Mark, 2021. "Pandemic Leadership: Did “Scientists” Lock Down More Quickly?," SocArXiv 9pazw, Center for Open Science.
    16. Maria Petrescu & Anjala S. Krishen, 0. "The importance of high-quality data and analytics during the pandemic," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-2.
    17. Deliberador, Lucas Rodrigues & Santos, Alexandre Borges & Carrijo, Pâmella Rodrigues Silva & Batalha, Mário Otávio & César, Aldara da Silva & Ferreira, Luís Miguel D.F., 2023. "How risk perception regarding the COVID-19 pandemic affected household food waste: Evidence from Brazil," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    18. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2021. "Successful Government Responses to the Pandemic: Contextualizing National and Urban Responses to the COVID-19 Outbreak in East and West," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Mitra, Debrudra & Chu, Yiyi & Cetin, Kristen, 2022. "COVID-19 impacts on residential occupancy schedules and activities in U.S. Homes in 2020 using ATUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    20. Cindy Cheng & Joan Barceló & Allison Spencer Hartnett & Robert Kubinec & Luca Messerschmidt, 2020. "COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0)," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(7), pages 756-768, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public health; Policy; Infection;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:581:y:2020:i:7806:d:10.1038_d41586-020-01248-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.