IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v324y2022ics0306261922010479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 impacts on residential occupancy schedules and activities in U.S. Homes in 2020 using ATUS

Author

Listed:
  • Mitra, Debrudra
  • Chu, Yiyi
  • Cetin, Kristen

Abstract

Many aspects of the daily lives of those living in the United States were substantially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the year 2020. A broad diversity of measures was implemented to curb the spread of the virus, many of which included adjustments to where and how people worked, went to school, and otherwise conducted their daily lives compared to pre-pandemic times. This has impacted how residential buildings are used, how much time people spend in their homes, and as a result, how much energy these buildings consume. The main objective of this study is to analyze, at a national scale, the differences in the occupancy schedules and activities conducted in homes in the U.S., as compared to pre-pandemic. 15 years of American Time Use Survey and Current Population Survey data, from 2006 to 2020, was used in this study to analyze the occupancy schedules for both pandemic (2020) and pre-pandemic (2006–2019) times. These impacts were also analyzed with respect to variables including, weekday/weekend, month of the year, age of the occupants, household income, and household size. The impact of the pandemic on occupant schedules were most substantial in the initial months, whereas as the months progressed, these occupancy profiles slowly changed. Across 2020, people spent, on average, 8 % more time (1.9 h) in their home on weekdays, and 3–6 % (1.2 h) on weekend days. The percentage of time spent for different activities and locations within homes were also studied. For 1-member households, their time spent at home decreased whereas for 2-, 3-, and 4- member households, they spent more time at home. Overall, people spent around 45% more time doing office- and work-related activities at home compared to pre-pandemic, which is likely due to increased remote working and schooling. This research helps to improve the understanding of the occupancy presence and absence profiles in U.S. residential buildings due to the pandemic and provides new insights as to modified profiles for researchers, building designers, and policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitra, Debrudra & Chu, Yiyi & Cetin, Kristen, 2022. "COVID-19 impacts on residential occupancy schedules and activities in U.S. Homes in 2020 using ATUS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:324:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922010479
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922010479
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krarti, Moncef & Aldubyan, Mohammad, 2021. "Review analysis of COVID-19 impact on electricity demand for residential buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Elizabeth Gibney, 2020. "Whose coronavirus strategy worked best? Scientists hunt most effective policies," Nature, Nature, vol. 581(7806), pages 15-16, May.
    3. Brooke Helppie-McFall & Joanne W. Hsu, 2020. "Financial Profiles of Workers Most Vulnerable to Coronavirus-Related Earnings Loss in the Spring of 2020," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2020-093, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Du, Feng & Yue, Hong & Zhang, Jiangfeng, 2023. "Influence of advertisement control to residential energy savings in large networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    2. Benedetto Schiavo & Ofelia Morton-Bermea & Thania Elizabeth Arredondo-Palacios & Diana Meza-Figueroa & Agustin Robles-Morua & Rocío García-Martínez & Daisy Valera-Fernández & Claudio Inguaggiato & Bel, 2022. "Analysis of COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Urban Air Quality: A Case Study of Monterrey, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enzo Cumbo & Giuseppe Gallina & Pietro Messina & Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina, 2023. "Filter Masks during the Second Phase of SARS-CoV-2: Study on Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-7, January.
    2. Teresa Cuerdo-Vilches & Miguel Ángel Navas-Martín & Ignacio Oteiza, 2021. "Behavior Patterns, Energy Consumption and Comfort during COVID-19 Lockdown Related to Home Features, Socioeconomic Factors and Energy Poverty in Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Maria Petrescu & Anjala S. Krishen, 2020. "The importance of high-quality data and analytics during the pandemic," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 43-44, June.
    4. Andy Hong & Sandip Chakrabarti, 2023. "Compact living or policy inaction? Effects of urban density and lockdown on the COVID-19 outbreak in the US," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1588-1609, July.
    5. Gopi Shah Goda & Emilie Jackson & Lauren Hersch Nicholas & Sarah See Stith, 2023. "The impact of Covid-19 on older workers’ employment and Social Security spillovers," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 813-846, April.
    6. Hu, Wenxuan & Scholz, Yvonne & Yeligeti, Madhura & Deng, Ying & Jochem, Patrick, 2024. "Future electricity demand for Europe: Unraveling the dynamics of the Temperature Response Function," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    7. Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Gintare Stankuniene, 2022. "Review of Energy and Climate Plans of Baltic States: The Contribution of Renewables for Energy Production in Households," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Cindy Cheng & Joan Barcelo & Allison Spencer Hartnett & Robert Kubinec & Luca Messerschmidt, 2020. "CoronaNet: A Dyadic Dataset of Government Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Working Papers 20200042, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised Apr 2020.
    9. Greer, Scott L. & Rozenblum, Sarah & Falkenbach, Michelle & Löblová, Olga & Jarman, Holly & Williams, Noah & Wismar, Matthias, 2022. "Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 408-417.
    10. Young Jun Choi & Stefan Kühner & Shih-Jiunn Shi, 2022. "From “new social risks” to “COVID social risks”: the challenges for inclusive society in South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan amid the pandemic [Asian development outlook 2021 update]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 260-274.
    11. Deliberador, Lucas Rodrigues & Santos, Alexandre Borges & Carrijo, Pâmella Rodrigues Silva & Batalha, Mário Otávio & César, Aldara da Silva & Ferreira, Luís Miguel D.F., 2023. "How risk perception regarding the COVID-19 pandemic affected household food waste: Evidence from Brazil," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    12. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Campos, José & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2023. "Electricity scenarios for Hungary: Possible role of wind and solar resources in the energy transition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    14. Robert J. R. Elliott & Ingmar Schumacher & Cees Withagen, 2020. "Suggestions for a Covid-19 Post-Pandemic Research Agenda in Environmental Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1187-1213, August.
    15. Zhang, Junyi & Zhang, Runsen & Ding, Hongxiang & Li, Shuangjin & Liu, Rui & Ma, Shuang & Zhai, Baoxin & Kashima, Saori & Hayashi, Yoshitsugu, 2021. "Effects of transport-related COVID-19 policy measures: A case study of six developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 37-57.
    16. Maria Petrescu & Anjala S. Krishen, 0. "The importance of high-quality data and analytics during the pandemic," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-2.
    17. Serge Blondel & Radu Vranceanu, 2020. "COVID-19 mortality and health expenditures across European countries: the positive correlation puzzle," Working Papers hal-02920258, HAL.
    18. Chreim, Bashar & Esseghir, Moez & Merghem-Boulahia, Leila, 2022. "LOSISH—LOad Scheduling In Smart Homes based on demand response: Application to smart grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    19. Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene & Tomas Karpavicius & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2022. "The Achievements of Climate Change and Energy Policy in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Halbrügge, Stephanie & Buhl, Hans Ulrich & Fridgen, Gilbert & Schott, Paul & Weibelzahl, Martin & Weissflog, Jan, 2022. "How Germany achieved a record share of renewables during the COVID-19 pandemic while relying on the European interconnected power network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:324:y:2022:i:c:s0306261922010479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.