IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v404y2000i6776d10.1038_35006062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua I. Gold

    (University of Washington)

  • Michael N. Shadlen

    (University of Washington)

Abstract

Behaviour often depends on the ability to make categorical judgements about sensory information acquired over time. Such judgements require a comparison of the evidence favouring the alternatives1,2,3,4, but how the brain forms these comparisons is unknown. Here we show that in a visual discrimination task, the accumulating balance of sensory evidence favouring one interpretation over another is evident in the neural circuits that generate the behavioural response. We trained monkeys to make a direction judgement about dynamic random-dot motion5 and to indicate their judgement with an eye movement to a visual target. We interrupted motion viewing with electrical microstimulation of the frontal eye field and analysed the resulting, evoked eye movements for evidence of ongoing activity associated with the oculomotor response6,7,8,9,10. Evoked eye movements deviated in the direction of the monkey's judgement. The magnitude of the deviation depended on motion strength and viewing time. The oculomotor signals responsible for these deviations reflected the accumulated motion information that informed the monkey's choices on the discrimination task. Thus, for this task, decision formation and motor preparation appear to share a common level of neural organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua I. Gold & Michael N. Shadlen, 2000. "Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands," Nature, Nature, vol. 404(6776), pages 390-394, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:404:y:2000:i:6776:d:10.1038_35006062
    DOI: 10.1038/35006062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/35006062
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/35006062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruno B Averbeck & Moonsang Seo, 2008. "The Statistical Neuroanatomy of Frontal Networks in the Macaque," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Kisho Ogasa & Atsushi Yokoi & Gouki Okazawa & Morimichi Nishigaki & Masaya Hirashima & Nobuhiro Hagura, 2024. "Decision uncertainty as a context for motor memory," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(9), pages 1738-1751, September.
    3. Ryan Webb, 2019. "The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 230-255, January.
    4. Fabio P. Leite & Roger Ratcliff, 2011. "What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(7), pages 651-687, October.
    5. Hancock, Thomas O. & Hess, Stephane & Marley, A.A.J. & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2021. "An accumulation of preference: Two alternative dynamic models for understanding transport choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 250-282.
    6. Mads Lund Pedersen & Tor Endestad & Guido Biele, 2015. "Evidence Accumulation and Choice Maintenance Are Dissociated in Human Perceptual Decision Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:7:p:651-687 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Adrian M Haith & David M Huberdeau & John W Krakauer, 2015. "Hedging Your Bets: Intermediate Movements as Optimal Behavior in the Context of an Incomplete Decision," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Zhewei Zhang & Chaoqun Yin & Tianming Yang, 2022. "Evidence accumulation occurs locally in the parietal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Jacek P Dmochowski & Anthony M Norcia, 2015. "Cortical Components of Reaction-Time during Perceptual Decisions in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:404:y:2000:i:6776:d:10.1038_35006062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.