IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v1y2017i7d10.1038_s41562-017-0131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prosocial apathy for helping others when effort is required

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia L. Lockwood

    (University of Oxford)

  • Mathilde Hamonet

    (University of Oxford)

  • Samuel H. Zhang

    (University of Oxford)

  • Anya Ratnavel

    (University of Oxford)

  • Florentine U. Salmony

    (University of Oxford)

  • Masud Husain

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford)

  • Matthew A. J. Apps

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

Prosocial acts—those that are costly to ourselves but benefit others—are a central component of human coexistence1–3. While the financial and moral costs of prosocial behaviours are well understood4–6, everyday prosocial acts do not typically come at such costs. Instead, they require effort. Here, using computational modelling of an effort-based task, we show that people are prosocially apathetic. They are less willing to choose to initiate highly effortful acts that benefit others compared with those benefitting themselves. Moreover, even when choosing to initiate effortful prosocial acts, people exhibit superficiality, exerting less force into the actions that benefit others than those that benefit themselves. These findings were replicated, and were present whether the other person was anonymous or not, and when choices were made to earn rewards or avoid losses. Importantly, the least prosocially motivated people had higher subclinical levels of psychopathy and social apathy. Thus, although people sometimes ‘help out’, they are less willing to benefit others and are sometimes ‘superficially prosocial’, which may characterize everyday prosociality and its disruption in social disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia L. Lockwood & Mathilde Hamonet & Samuel H. Zhang & Anya Ratnavel & Florentine U. Salmony & Masud Husain & Matthew A. J. Apps, 2017. "Prosocial apathy for helping others when effort is required," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0131
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0131
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-017-0131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patricia L. Lockwood & Jo Cutler & Daniel Drew & Ayat Abdurahman & Deva Sanjeeva Jeyaretna & Matthew A. J. Apps & Masud Husain & Sanjay G. Manohar, 2024. "Human ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary for prosocial motivation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(7), pages 1403-1416, July.
    2. Sławomir Rębisz & Aleksandra Jasińska-Maciążek & Paweł Grygiel & Roman Dolata, 2023. "Psycho-Social Correlates of Cyberbullying among Polish Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-34, April.
    3. Alizée Lopez-Persem & Lionel Rigoux & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Jean Daunizeau & Mathias Pessiglione, 2017. "Choose, rate or squeeze: Comparison of economic value functions elicited by different behavioral tasks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Yuanyuan Zhou & Zhuoying Fei & Yuanqiong He & Zhilin Yang, 2022. "How Human–Chatbot Interaction Impairs Charitable Giving: The Role of Moral Judgment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 849-865, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.