IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i8p5521-d1123723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psycho-Social Correlates of Cyberbullying among Polish Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Sławomir Rębisz

    (Institute of Education, University of Rzeszów, ul. Ks. Jałowego 24, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Jasińska-Maciążek

    (Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw, ul. Mokotowska 16/20, 00-561 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Paweł Grygiel

    (Institute of Education, Jagiellonian University, ul. Batorego 12, 31-135 Kraków, Poland)

  • Roman Dolata

    (Faculty of Education, University of Warsaw, ul. Mokotowska 16/20, 00-561 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Cyberbullying has recently attracted attention due to its increasing prevalence and serious consequences for both victims and perpetrators. The objective of this population-based study was to examine the determinants of a person becoming a perpetrator of cyberbullying, including personal resources (emotional self-regulation, self-esteem, internal locus of control, optimism), social skills (prosocial behavior, assertiveness, cognitive empathy, cooperation), peer relationships (peer support, threats from peers, peer rejection, dislike of peers), and problematic Internet use (excessive Internet use, impulsive reactions to Internet deprivation). Participants (N = 541) were students at elementary schools (age 14–15) in Ostroleka, a city in central-eastern Poland. Two-part regression was used to explore protective/risk factors of the likelihood of an individual using cyberviolence (dichotomous part: involvement in violence) and how often it is used (continuous part: frequency of cyberbullying). The results showed that the emotional component is crucial to cyberbullying, as indicated by the importance of emotional self-control, which reduces the frequency of cyberbullying. Other important factors are assertiveness, impulsive response to limited Internet access (which increases the likelihood of engaging in cyberbullying) and fear of peers (which reduces its frequency). In turn, the importance of pro-sociality (which inhibits engagement) and peer support (which promotes engagement) points to the second important component of cyberbullying—that is, group mechanisms. At the same time, the results indicate that while the importance of Internet addiction as a risk factor for cyberbullying should not be underestimated, the amount of time spent online cannot be seen as the source of the problem. The study leads to the conclusion that effective interventions targeting cyberbullying should focus on the development of more adaptive styles of coping with emotions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sławomir Rębisz & Aleksandra Jasińska-Maciążek & Paweł Grygiel & Roman Dolata, 2023. "Psycho-Social Correlates of Cyberbullying among Polish Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-34, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5521-:d:1123723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5521/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5521/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maja Gajda & Agnieszka Małkowska-Szkutnik & Wojciech Rodzeń, 2022. "Self-Regulation in Adolescents: Polish Adaptation and Validation of the Self-Regulation Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Yang, Jiping & Wang, Na & Gao, Ling & Wang, Xingchao, 2021. "Deviant peer affiliation and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: Online disinhibition and perceived social support as moderators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Mullahy, John, 1986. "Specification and testing of some modified count data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 341-365, December.
    4. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    5. Jacek Pyżalski & Piotr Plichta & Anna Szuster & Julia Barlińska, 2022. "Cyberbullying Characteristics and Prevention—What Can We Learn from Narratives Provided by Adolescents and Their Teachers?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Handono, Santi Gusti & Laeheem, Kasetchai & Sittichai, Ruthaychonnee, 2019. "Factors related with cyberbullying among the youth of Jakarta, Indonesia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 235-239.
    7. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    8. Patricia L. Lockwood & Mathilde Hamonet & Samuel H. Zhang & Anya Ratnavel & Florentine U. Salmony & Masud Husain & Matthew A. J. Apps, 2017. "Prosocial apathy for helping others when effort is required," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(7), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Jacinto Martínez & Antonio J. Rodríguez-Hidalgo & Izabela Zych, 2020. "Bullying and Cyberbullying in Adolescents from Disadvantaged Areas: Validation of Questionnaires; Prevalence Rates; and Relationship to Self-Esteem, Empathy and Social Skills," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Ayelet Pe’er & Michelle Slone, 2022. "Media Exposure to Armed Conflict: Dispositional Optimism and Self-Mastery Moderate Distress and Post-Traumatic Symptoms among Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Meena Madhavan & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "The Effects of Innovation Adoption and Social Factors between Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Joan Boada-Grau, 2020. "Teacher Technostress in the Chilean School System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Brian D. Segal & Thomas Braun & Richard Gonzalez & Michael R. Elliott, 2019. "Tests of Matrix Structure for Construct Validation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 65-83, March.
    4. Gaston-Breton, Charlotte & Lemoine, Jérémy E. & Voyer, Benjamin G. & Kastanakis, Minas N., 2021. "Pleasure, meaning or spirituality: Cross-cultural differences in orientations to happiness across 12 countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-12.
    5. Luetke, Maya & Judge, Ashley & Kianersi, Sina & Jules, Reginal & Rosenberg, Molly, 2020. "Hurricane impact associated with transactional sex and moderated, but not mediated, by economic factors in Okay, Haiti," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    6. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Sheyla Müller-Pérez & Joan Boada-Grau, 2021. "Technostress of Chilean Teachers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Teleworking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Martinez, Rae Anne M. & Howard, Annie Green & Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay & Maselko, Joanna & Pence, Brian W. & Dhingra, Radhika & Galea, Sandro & Uddin, Monica & Wildman, Derek E. & Aiello, Allison E., 2024. "Does biological age mediate the relationship between childhood adversity and depression? Insights from the Detroit Neighborhood Health Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    8. Williford, Anne & Sharp, Julia L. & Fout, Alex & Schafer, Casey & Shi, Xiaosong & Isen, Debbie, 2021. "The mediating role of willingness to seek help on the relationship between peer victimization and mental health outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Camilla Matera & Lars Dommermuth & Silvia Bacci & Bruno Bertaccini & Alessandra Minello & Daniele Vignoli, 2023. "Perceived Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Intentions in Couples: A Dyadic Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 790-806, December.
    10. Vanessa Sanchez-Mendoza & Encarnacion Soriano-Ayala & Pablo Vallejo-Medina, 2020. "Psychometric Properties of the Condom Use Self-Efficacy Scale among Young Colombians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Falk, Carl F. & Muthukrishna, Michael, 2021. "Parsimony in model selection: tools for assessing fit propensity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110856, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Andreas Falke & Nadine Schröder & Herbert Endres, 2020. "A first fit index on estimation accuracy in structural equation models," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 277-302, March.
    13. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Pasini & Margherita Brondino, 2023. "A Person-Centered Approach to Job Insecurity: Is There a Reciprocal Relationship between the Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Job Insecurity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Masashi Soga & Kevin J. Gaston & Yuichi Yamaura & Kiyo Kurisu & Keisuke Hanaki, 2016. "Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    16. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Boncinelli, Fabio & Bartolini, Fabio & Casini, Leonardo, 2018. "Structural factors of labour allocation for farm diversification activities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 204-212.
    18. Nuanphromsakul, Kajohnjak & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna & Kot, Sebastian & Chaveesuk, Singha & Chaiyasoonthorn, Wornchanok, 2022. "Sustainability of Rubber Farmers Cooperatives: Empirical Evaluation of Determining Factors," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4), December.
    19. Kan, Kamhon & Fu, Tsu-Tan, 1997. "Analysis of Housewives' Grocery Shopping Behavior in Taiwan: An Application of the Poisson Switching Regression," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 397-407, December.
    20. Mark Shevlin & David Boyda & James Houston & Jamie Murphy, 2015. "Measurement of the psychosis continuum: Modelling the frequency and distress of subclinical psychotic experiences," Psychosis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 108-118, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5521-:d:1123723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.