Author
Listed:
- Keren Papier
(University of Oxford)
- Kathryn E. Bradbury
(The University of Auckland)
- Angela Balkwill
(University of Oxford)
- Isobel Barnes
(University of Oxford)
- Karl Smith-Byrne
(University of Oxford)
- Marc J. Gunter
(Imperial College London
International Agency for Research on Cancer)
- Sonja I. Berndt
(National Institutes of Health)
- Loic Marchand
(University of Hawaii Cancer Center)
- Anna H. Wu
(Department of Population and Public Health Sciences)
- Ulrike Peters
(Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center)
- Valerie Beral
(University of Oxford)
- Timothy J. Key
(University of Oxford)
- Gillian K. Reeves
(University of Oxford)
Abstract
Uncertainty remains regarding the role of diet in colorectal cancer development. We examined associations of 97 dietary factors with colorectal cancer risk in 542,778 Million Women Study participants (12,251 incident cases over 16.6 years), and conducted a targeted genetic analysis in the ColoRectal Transdisciplinary Study, Colon Cancer Family Registry, and Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). Alcohol (relative risk per 20 g/day=1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.20) and calcium (per 300 mg/day=0.83, 0.77–0.89) intakes had the strongest associations, followed by six dairy-related factors associated with calcium. We showed a positive association with red and processed meat intake and weaker inverse associations with breakfast cereal, fruit, wholegrains, carbohydrates, fibre, total sugars, folate, and vitamin C. Genetically predicted milk consumption was inversely associated with risk of colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers. We conclude that dairy products help protect against colorectal cancer, and that this is driven largely or wholly by calcium.
Suggested Citation
Keren Papier & Kathryn E. Bradbury & Angela Balkwill & Isobel Barnes & Karl Smith-Byrne & Marc J. Gunter & Sonja I. Berndt & Loic Marchand & Anna H. Wu & Ulrike Peters & Valerie Beral & Timothy J. Key, 2025.
"Diet-wide analyses for risk of colorectal cancer: prospective study of 12,251 incident cases among 542,778 women in the UK,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55219-5
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55219-5
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-55219-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.