IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v16y2025i1d10.1038_s41467-024-54916-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The molecular reach of antibodies crucially underpins their viral neutralisation capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Huhn

    (University of Oxford)

  • Daniel Nissley

    (University of Oxford)

  • Daniel B. Wilson

    (University of Oxford
    Boston University
    University of New South Wales)

  • Mikhail A. Kutuzov

    (University of Oxford)

  • Robert Donat

    (University of Oxford)

  • Tiong Kit Tan

    (University of Oxford)

  • Ying Zhang

    (Boston University
    Northeastern University)

  • Michael I. Barton

    (University of Oxford)

  • Chang Liu

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford)

  • Wanwisa Dejnirattisai

    (University of Oxford
    Mahidol University)

  • Piyada Supasa

    (University of Oxford)

  • Juthathip Mongkolsapaya

    (University of Oxford)

  • Alain Townsend

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford)

  • William James

    (University of Oxford)

  • Gavin Screaton

    (University of Oxford
    University of Oxford
    Oxford)

  • P. Anton van der Merwe

    (University of Oxford)

  • Charlotte M. Deane

    (University of Oxford)

  • Samuel A. Isaacson

    (Boston University)

  • Omer Dushek

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

Key functions of antibodies, such as viral neutralisation, depend on high-affinity binding. However, viral neutralisation poorly correlates with antigen affinity for reasons that have been unclear. Here, we use a new mechanistic model of bivalent binding to study >45 patient-isolated IgG1 antibodies interacting with SARS-CoV-2 RBD surfaces. The model provides the standard monovalent affinity/kinetics and new bivalent parameters, including the molecular reach: the maximum antigen separation enabling bivalent binding. We find large variations in these parameters across antibodies, including reach variations (22–46 nm) that exceed the physical antibody size (~15 nm). By using antigens of different physical sizes, we show that these large molecular reaches are the result of both the antibody and antigen sizes. Although viral neutralisation correlates poorly with affinity, a striking correlation is observed with molecular reach. Indeed, the molecular reach explains differences in neutralisation for antibodies binding with the same affinity to the same RBD-epitope. Thus, antibodies within an isotype class binding the same antigen can display differences in molecular reach, substantially modulating their binding and functional properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Huhn & Daniel Nissley & Daniel B. Wilson & Mikhail A. Kutuzov & Robert Donat & Tiong Kit Tan & Ying Zhang & Michael I. Barton & Chang Liu & Wanwisa Dejnirattisai & Piyada Supasa & Juthathip Mongk, 2025. "The molecular reach of antibodies crucially underpins their viral neutralisation capacity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54916-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54916-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54916-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-54916-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-54916-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.