IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v15y2024i1d10.1038_s41467-024-51967-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying benefits of renewable investments for German residential Prosumers in times of volatile energy markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas van Ouwerkerk

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

  • Mauricio Celi Cortés

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

  • Najet Nsir

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

  • Jingyu Gong

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

  • Jan Figgener

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

  • Sebastian Zurmühlen

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

  • Christian Bußar

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

  • Dirk Uwe Sauer

    (RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    RWTH Aachen University
    JARA-Energy)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine have led to unseen disruptions in the global energy markets since the end of 2021. Residential renewable investments like photovoltaic systems, battery home storage systems, and heat pumps are therefore gaining traction. However, the benefits of those technologies during the energy crisis and beyond have not been fully quantified yet. Therefore, in this study, we benchmark renewable investments for a broad variety of single-family homes by evaluating potential cost savings and emission reductions. In addition, the study considers the influence of recent political incentives and subsidies. The results show that photovoltaic systems are a no-regret investment decision, both economically and environmentally. At the climax of the energy crisis, a typical German household with a heat pump could save 1850 € and reduce equivalent CO2 emissions by 250 g/kWh annually. Politically introduced price breaks on electricity and natural gas do not reverse this advantage. Furthermore, when owning an electric vehicle renewable investments are often more beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas van Ouwerkerk & Mauricio Celi Cortés & Najet Nsir & Jingyu Gong & Jan Figgener & Sebastian Zurmühlen & Christian Bußar & Dirk Uwe Sauer, 2024. "Quantifying benefits of renewable investments for German residential Prosumers in times of volatile energy markets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-51967-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51967-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51967-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-024-51967-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Ruhnau & Clemens Stiewe & Jarusch Muessel & Lion Hirth, 2023. "Natural gas savings in Germany during the 2022 energy crisis," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 621-628, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng Yang & Hong-Yi Shi & Jia Liu & Yang-Yan Lai & Özgür Bayer & Li-Wu Fan, 2024. "Supercooled erythritol for high-performance seasonal thermal energy storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Benjamin Moll & Moritz Schularick & Georg Zachmann, 2023. "Nicht einmal eine Rezession: Die große deutsche Gasdebatte im Rückblick," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 048, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    3. Lukas Brunninger & Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt & Klaus Gugler & Sven Heim, 2024. "The Gas Price Brake Increases Gas Prices: Empirical Evidence," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp372, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    4. Moll, Ben & Schularick, Moritz & Zachmann, Georg, 2023. "The power of substitution: the great German gas debate in retrospect," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120515, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Hartvig, Áron Dénes & Kiss-Dobronyi, Bence & Kotek, Péter & Takácsné Tóth, Borbála & Gutzianas, Ioannis & Zareczky, András Zsombor, 2024. "The economic and energy security implications of the Russian energy weapon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    6. Hirth, Lion & Khanna, Tarun M. & Ruhnau, Oliver, 2024. "How aggregate electricity demand responds to hourly wholesale price fluctuations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Anton Pichler & Jan Hurt & Tobias Reisch & Johannes Stangl & Stefan Thurner, 2024. "Economic impacts of a drastic gas supply shock and short-term mitigation strategies," Papers 2409.07981, arXiv.org.
    8. Bachmann, Rüdiger & Baqaee, David Rezza & Bayer, Christian & Kuhn, Moritz & Löschel, Andreas & Moll, Ben & Peichl, Andreas & Pittel, Karen & Schularick, Moritz, 2024. "What if? The macroeconomic and distributional effects for Germany of a stop of energy imports from Russia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124094, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Lennard Schlattmann, 2024. "Spatial Redistribution of Carbon Taxes," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 345, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    10. Flottmann, Jonty, 2024. "Australian energy policy decisions in the wake of the 2022 energy crisis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 238-248.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-024-51967-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.