IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v12y2021i1d10.1038_s41467-021-26963-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A standardized gnotobiotic mouse model harboring a minimal 15-member mouse gut microbiota recapitulates SOPF/SPF phenotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Darnaud

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Filipe Vadder

    (Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)

  • Pascaline Bogeat

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Lilia Boucinha

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Anne-Laure Bulteau

    (Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)

  • Andrei Bunescu

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Céline Couturier

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Ana Delgado

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Hélène Dugua

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Céline Elie

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Alban Mathieu

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Tereza Novotná

    (Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences)

  • Djomangan Adama Ouattara

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Séverine Planel

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Adrien Saliou

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Dagmar Šrůtková

    (Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences)

  • Jennifer Yansouni

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

  • Bärbel Stecher

    (Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich
    Partner Site)

  • Martin Schwarzer

    (Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences)

  • François Leulier

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique
    Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1)

  • Andrea Tamellini

    (Institut de Recherche Technologique)

Abstract

Mus musculus is the classic mammalian model for biomedical research. Despite global efforts to standardize breeding and experimental procedures, the undefined composition and interindividual diversity of the microbiota of laboratory mice remains a limitation. In an attempt to standardize the gut microbiome in preclinical mouse studies, here we report the development of a simplified mouse microbiota composed of 15 strains from 7 of the 20 most prevalent bacterial families representative of the fecal microbiota of C57BL/6J Specific (and Opportunistic) Pathogen-Free (SPF/SOPF) animals and the derivation of a standardized gnotobiotic mouse model called GM15. GM15 recapitulates extensively the functionalities found in the C57BL/6J SOPF microbiota metagenome, and GM15 animals are phenotypically similar to SOPF or SPF animals in two different facilities. They are also less sensitive to the deleterious effects of post-weaning malnutrition. In this work, we show that the GM15 model provides increased reproducibility and robustness of preclinical studies by limiting the confounding effect of fluctuation in microbiota composition, and offers opportunities for research focused on how the microbiota shapes host physiology in health and disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Darnaud & Filipe Vadder & Pascaline Bogeat & Lilia Boucinha & Anne-Laure Bulteau & Andrei Bunescu & Céline Couturier & Ana Delgado & Hélène Dugua & Céline Elie & Alban Mathieu & Tereza Novotná , 2021. "A standardized gnotobiotic mouse model harboring a minimal 15-member mouse gut microbiota recapitulates SOPF/SPF phenotypes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26963-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26963-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26963-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-26963-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck & Herbert W. Virgin, 2016. "Accounting for reciprocal host–microbiome interactions in experimental science," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7606), pages 191-199, June.
    2. Dray, Stéphane & Dufour, Anne-Béatrice, 2007. "The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i04).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengfei Song & Wen Qin & YanGan Huang & Lei Wang & Zhenyuan Cai & Tongzuo Zhang, 2020. "Grazing Management Influences Gut Microbial Diversity of Livestock in the Same Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Jonas Eberle & Renier Myburgh & Dirk Ahrens, 2014. "The Evolution of Morphospace in Phytophagous Scarab Chafers: No Competition - No Divergence?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Liesbeth François & Katrien Wijnrocx & Frédéric G Colinet & Nicolas Gengler & Bettine Hulsegge & Jack J Windig & Nadine Buys & Steven Janssens, 2017. "Genomics of a revived breed: Case study of the Belgian campine cattle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Calenge, Clément, 2007. "Exploring Habitat Selection by Wildlife with adehabitat," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i06).
    5. Serra W. Buchanan & Megan Baskerville & Maren Oelbermann & Andrew M. Gordon & Naresh V. Thevathasan & Marney E. Isaac, 2020. "Plant Diversity and Agroecosystem Function in Riparian Agroforests: Providing Ecosystem Services and Land-Use Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Catharine Prussing & Kevin J Emerson & Sara A Bickersmith & Maria Anice Mureb Sallum & Jan E Conn, 2019. "Minimal genetic differentiation of the malaria vector Nyssorhynchus darlingi associated with forest cover level in Amazonian Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Anna Favati & Josefina Zidar & Hanne Thorpe & Per Jensen & Hanne Løvlie, 2016. "The ontogeny of personality traits in the red junglefowl, Gallus gallus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 484-493.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:22:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Alessandro Bellino & Daniela Baldantoni & Vittoria Milano & Lucia Santorufo & Jérôme Cortet & Giulia Maisto, 2021. "Spatial Patterns and Scales of Collembola Taxonomic and Functional Diversity in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Keith Hunley & Kiela Gwin & Brendan Liberman, 2016. "A Reassessment of the Impact of European Contact on the Structure of Native American Genetic Diversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Jean-Pierre Rossi & Maxime Nardin & Martin Godefroid & Manuela Ruiz-Diaz & Anne-Sophie Sergent & Alejandro Martinez-Meier & Luc Pâques & Philippe Rozenberg, 2014. "Dissecting the Space-Time Structure of Tree-Ring Datasets Using the Partial Triadic Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Colléter, Mathieu & Valls, Audrey & Guitton, Jérôme & Gascuel, Didier & Pauly, Daniel & Christensen, Villy, 2015. "Global overview of the applications of the Ecopath with Ecosim modeling approach using the EcoBase models repository," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 302(C), pages 42-53.
    13. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. J Roman Arguello & Carolina Sellanes & Yann Ru Lou & Robert A Raguso, 2013. "Can Yeast (S. cerevisiae) Metabolic Volatiles Provide Polymorphic Signaling?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Buhmann, Anne K. & Waller, Uwe & Wecker, Bert & Papenbrock, Jutta, 2015. "Optimization of culturing conditions and selection of species for the use of halophytes as biofilter for nutrient-rich saline water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 102-114.
    16. Raphaëlle Momal & Stéphane Robin & Christophe Ambroise, 2021. "Accounting for missing actors in interaction network inference from abundance data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1230-1258, November.
    17. Angélica Ochoa-Beltrán & Johanna Andrea Martínez-Villa & Peter G. Kennedy & Beatriz Salgado-Negret & Alvaro Duque, 2021. "Plant Trait Assembly in Species-Rich Forests at Varying Elevations in the Northwest Andes of Colombia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Kneib, Thomas & Petzoldt, Thomas, 2007. "Introduction to the Special Volume on "Ecology and Ecological Modeling in R"," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 22(i01).
    19. Francisco Palomares & Néstor Fernández & Severine Roques & Cuauhtemoc Chávez & Leandro Silveira & Claudia Keller & Begoña Adrados, 2016. "Fine-Scale Habitat Segregation between Two Ecologically Similar Top Predators," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Rune B Jakobsen & Esben Østrup & Xiaolan Zhang & Tarjei S Mikkelsen & Jan E Brinchmann, 2014. "Analysis of the Effects of Five Factors Relevant to In Vitro Chondrogenesis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Factorial Design and High Throughput mRNA-Profiling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    21. Angélique Richard & Loïs Boullu & Ulysse Herbach & Arnaud Bonnafoux & Valérie Morin & Elodie Vallin & Anissa Guillemin & Nan Papili Gao & Rudiyanto Gunawan & Jérémie Cosette & Ophélie Arnaud & Jean-Ja, 2016. "Single-Cell-Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell-to-Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-35, December.
    22. Lorena Muñoz & Vera Helene Hausner, 2013. "What Do the IUCN Categories Really Protect? A Case Study of the Alpine Regions in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:12:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-26963-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.