IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/bmsmti/v11y2020i1p232-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trustless Technology within Trust-Based Systems; A Comparative Study of the Big Four’s Approach to Blockchain Adoption and its Future Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Amjad Pirotti
  • Amir Roknifard

Abstract

Technological developments and industrial adaptations are leading to a fundamental change in how industries and strategy function in the world today. Disruptive technologies are forcing us to reconsider the way we make decisions, and the models that were previously in place for delivering products and services. Blockchain in particular has demonstrated its ability to completely upend industry as we know it. Its main strengths lie in the fact that it is decentralized, unchangeable, anonymous and auditable. In this paper, we present a comparative study on the Big Four accounting firms’ approach to Blockchain development and adoption. We first give an overview of the blockchain technology and key characteristics of the blockchain and its applications. Furthermore, we discuss some existing approaches for blockchain development and application in the Big Four accounting firms and highlight the opportunities and future prospects of blockchain technology that can be utilized by the four professional services conglomerates.

Suggested Citation

  • Amjad Pirotti & Amir Roknifard, 2020. "Trustless Technology within Trust-Based Systems; A Comparative Study of the Big Four’s Approach to Blockchain Adoption and its Future Prospects," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 232-242, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:232-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/download/17095/13386
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/17095
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Karajovic & Henry M. Kim & Marek Laskowski, 2019. "Thinking Outside the Block: Projected Phases of Blockchain Integration in the Accounting Industry," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(2), pages 319-330, June.
    2. Peters, Gareth W. & Panayi, Efstathios & Chapelley, Ariane, 2015. "Trends in cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies: a monetary theory and regulation perspective," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 92-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ameyaw, Prince Donkor & de Vries, Walter Timo, 2023. "Blockchain technology adaptation for land administration services: The importance of socio-cultural elements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Erica Pimentel & Emilio Boulianne, 2020. "Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 325-361, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaheer Allam, 2018. "On Smart Contracts And Organisational Performance: A Review Of Smart Contracts Through The Blockchain Technology," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 22, pages 137-156, December.
    2. Muhammad Najib Razali & Rohaya Abdul Jalil & Ainur Zaireen Zainudin & Norhidayah Mohd Yunus & Azlina Mohd. Yassin, 2021. "Blockchain System Architecture for Land Registration," LARES lares-2021-4dqe, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    3. Hang Bui Thi Thu & Huy Dinh Tran Ngoc & An Phan Thuy & Ngoc Nguyen Thi Bich & Duyen Huynh Thi My, 2020. "Current situation of Bitcoin management and use: perspectives from the world and recommendations for vietnam," Management, Sciendo, vol. 24(2), pages 209-235, December.
    4. Ammar AL-Ashmori & P. D. D. Dominic & Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh, 2022. "Items and Constructs of Blockchain Adoption in Software Development Industry: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Han, Hongdan & Shiwakoti, Radha K. & Jarvis, Robin & Mordi, Chima & Botchie, David, 2023. "Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    6. Albekov Adam Umarovich & Vovchenko Natalia Gennadyevna & Andreeva Olga Vladimirovna & Sichev Roman Alexandrovich, 2017. "Block Chain and Financial Controlling in the System of Technological Provision of Large Corporations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 3-12.
    7. Muhammad Sardaraz ( & Muhammad Tahir & Usman Aziz, 2022. "Critical Review of Blockchain Consensus Algorithms: challenges and opportunities," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 4(5), pages 52-64, June.
    8. Alexander Grech & Anthony Camilleri, 2017. "Blockchain in Education," JRC Research Reports JRC108255, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Marco Bellucci & Damiano Cesa Bianchi & Giacomo Manetti, 2021. "A literature review on blockchain in accounting research," Working Papers - Business wp2021_04.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    10. Marten Risius & Kai Spohrer, 2017. "A Blockchain Research Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(6), pages 385-409, December.
    11. Wandhöfer, Ruth, 2019. "Technology innovation in financial markets : Implications for money, payments and settlement finality," Other publications TiSEM b7d8b24a-dbf4-4f82-b596-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Veronica Grosu & Daniel Botez & Anatol Melega & Rozalia Kicsi & Svetlana Mihaila & Anamaria Geanina Macovei, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of the transformative synergies between blockchain and accounting in the uprooting of economic criminality," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(4), pages 77-105, June.
    13. Seong-Kyu Kim & Ung-Mo Kim & Jun-Ho Huh, 2019. "A Study on Improvement of Blockchain Application to Overcome Vulnerability of IoT Multiplatform Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, January.
    14. Andrew B. Jackson & Steven Luu, 2023. "Accounting For Digital Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(3), pages 302-312, September.
    15. Albayati, Hayder & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2020. "Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Michael Kend & Lan Anh Nguyen, 2020. "Big Data Analytics and Other Emerging Technologies: The Impact on the Australian Audit and Assurance Profession," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 269-282, December.
    17. Walker, Clive B., 2024. "Going mainstream: Cryptocurrency narratives in newspapers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Hans Rawhouser & Silvio Vismara & Nir Kshetri, 2024. "Blockchain and vulnerable entrepreneurial ecosystems," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1-2), pages 10-35, January.
    19. Cynthia Weiyi Cai, 2021. "Triple‐entry accounting with blockchain: How far have we come?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 71-93, March.
    20. Ammar AL-Ashmori & Gunasekar Thangarasu & P. D. D. Dominic & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "A Readiness Model and Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Malaysia’s Software Sector: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:232-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.