IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/msn/rfjrnl/v4y2019i7p86-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retos y Oportunidades del Comportamiento Organizacional de los Millennials como Fuerza de Trabajo

Author

Listed:
  • Flor Madrigal Moreno

    (Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo)

  • Fernando Ávila Carreón

    (Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo)

  • Salvador Madrigal Moreno

    (Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo)

Abstract

En esta investigación se indaga a los millennials como grupo generacional que se integra a la fuerza de trabajo. Además, se hace un análisis de la visión que tienen los dirigentes de las organizaciones al enfrentarse a este segmento como miembros con expectativas irrealmente altas, necesidad de elogios, que desacatan normas y con vestimenta casual, entre otras. Los millennials representan un importante capital creativo, dinámico y tecnológico crucialmente necesario en la organización de vanguardia. Se intenta identificar puntos de coincidencia entre lo que el millennial ofrece y lo que demanda la organización para el bien común. Para identificar la caracterización del comportamiento del joven millennial en el entorno laboral se hizo una revisión de la literatura actualizada, a través del análisis de artículos científicos, así como journals especializados en marketing y comportamiento organizacional de las bases de datos Emerald, Springer, Science Direct y ProQuest. Los resultados de esta investigación muestran que la rotación laboral en este segmento es cada vez mayor pues se ha identificado que los millennials manifiestan una necesidad de cambio así como una búsqueda permanente de empleo. En promedio permanecen máximo 3 años en un empleo si no satisface sus expectativas, además se destaca la importancia del equilibrio entre el trabajo y vida privada como elemento clave para su permanencia.

Suggested Citation

  • Flor Madrigal Moreno & Fernando Ávila Carreón & Salvador Madrigal Moreno, 2019. "Retos y Oportunidades del Comportamiento Organizacional de los Millennials como Fuerza de Trabajo," Revista de la Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, vol. 4(7), pages 86-95, Enero.
    • Handle: RePEc:msn:rfjrnl:v:4:y:2019:i:7:p:86-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rfcca.umich.mx/index.php/rfcca/article/view/109
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brice Corgnet & Antonio M. Espin & Roberto Hernán-González, 2016. "Creativity and Cognitive Skills among Millennials : Thinking Too Much and Creating Too Little," Post-Print hal-02312050, HAL.
    2. Brice Corgnet & Antonio M. Espin & Roberto Hernán-González, 2015. "The cognitive basis of social behavior : cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives," Post-Print hal-02311954, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corgnet, Brice & Martin, Ludivine & Ndodjang, Peguy & Sutan, Angela, 2019. "On the merit of equal pay: Performance manipulation and incentive setting," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 23-45.
    2. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Nicolas Jacquemet & Stéphane Luchini & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2016. "Fluid intelligence and cognitive reflection in a strategic environment: evidence from dominance-solvable games," Post-Print hal-01359231, HAL.
    3. Brandts, Jordi & Corgnet, Brice & Hernán-González, Roberto & Ortiz, José Mª & Solà, Carles, 2021. "Watching or not watching? Access to information and the incentive effects of firing threats," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 672-685.
    4. Antonio Cabrales & Irma Clots-Figueras & Roberto Hernán-Gonzalez & Praveen Kujal, 2020. "Instiutions, Opportunism and Prosocial Behavior: Some Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 20-17, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    5. Cortney S. Rodet, 2021. "The wellspring of creativity? Using divergent‐thinking tasks to understand creative characteristics," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(6), pages 1435-1453, September.
    6. Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Kujal, Praveen & Lenkei, Balint, 2019. "Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Brice Corgnet & Mark Desantis & David Porter, 2018. "What Makes a Good Trader? On the Role of Intuition and Reflection on Trader Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(3), pages 1113-1137, June.
    8. Brice Corgnet, 2018. "Rac(g)e Against the Machine? Social Incentives When Humans Meet Robots," Post-Print halshs-01984467, HAL.
    9. Michalis Drouvelis & Benjamin M. Marx, 2021. "Dimensions of donation preferences: the structure of peer and income effects," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 274-302, March.
    10. Brice Corgnet & Simon Gaechter & Roberto Hernán González, 2020. "Working too much for too little: stochastic rewards cause work addiction," Working Papers 2007, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    11. Pablo Bra~nas-Garza & Antonio Cabrales & Mar'ia Paz Espinosa & Diego Jorrat, 2022. "The effect of ambiguity in strategic environments: an experiment," Papers 2209.11079, arXiv.org.
    12. Amador-Hidalgo, Luis & Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Espín, Antonio M. & García-Muñoz, Teresa & Hernández-Román, Ana, 2021. "Cognitive abilities and risk-taking: Errors, not preferences," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Roman M. Sheremeta, 2016. "Impulsive Behavior in Competition: Testing Theories of Overbidding in Rent-Seeking Contests," Working Papers 16-21, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    14. Espín, Antonio M. & Correa, Manuel & Ruiz-Villaverde, Alberto, 2022. "Economics students: Self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    15. Goeschl, Timo & Lohse, Johannes, 2018. "Cooperation in public good games. Calculated or confused?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 185-203.
    16. Brice Corgnet & Mark DeSantis & David Porter, 2015. "What Makes a Good Trader? On the Role of Quant Skills, Behavioral Biases and Intuition on Trader Performance," Working Papers 15-17, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    17. Rassenti, Stephen & Espin, Antonio M. & Kujal, Praveen, 2017. "Humans’ (incorrect) distrust of reflective decisions," CEPR Discussion Papers 11949, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Espín, Antonio M. & Correa, Manuel & Ruiz-Villaverde, Alberto, 2019. "Patience predicts cooperative synergy: The roles of ingroup bias and reciprocity," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    19. Cabeza Martínez, Begoña, 2023. "Social preferences, support for redistribution, and attitudes towards vulnerable groups," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Brañas, Pablo & Cabrales, Antonio & Espinosa, María Paz & García-Muñoz, Teresa, 2024. "Behind the support for redistributive politics: Social preferences or beliefs?," CEPR Discussion Papers 19274, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:msn:rfjrnl:v:4:y:2019:i:7:p:86-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/famicmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.