IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgs/jibrme/v4y2019i4p7-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Target Cost Contracts and The Development of Collaborative Behaviours and Value for Money in The UK Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Smith A.

    (School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, UK)

  • Wood Gerard

    (School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, UK)

Abstract

TCCs are seen to be a procurement model capable of achieving value for money through aligning the objectives of the parties to reduce costs. The use of Target Cost Contracts (TCCs) within the UK construction industry has increased dramatically over the past few years. TCCs have been employed successfully on recent large scale projects such as Heathrow Terminal 5, Crossrail Procurement Strategy and the 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Infrastructure. Due to the success of TCCs over recent years, many clients are now turning to them in a bid to obtain value for money. However, it seems that they do not always drive parties to minimise costs and provide value for money. This research paper investigates the extent to which TCCs promote collaborative behaviours and provide value for money within the UK construction industry. More particularly, the research explores the following: which projects TCCs should be used on and how the maturity of the design when agreeing the target cost can affect value for money; how setting both the target cost and the pain/gain mechanism can affect the incentivisation of the contractor to minimise costs; the extent to which TCCs promote collaboration between the contractor, client and supply chain; and what is required to manage a TCC post-contract to ensure that incentivisation is maintained. It has become apparent from the research that TCCs are complex procurement models which require extensive consideration and management to ensure parties are incentivised to minimise costs. The research reveals that although TCCs can promote collaborative behaviours and provide value for money, there is a prerequisite to doing so: developing and managing the TCC correctly to ensure that the objectives of the parties are aligned.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith A. & Wood Gerard, 2019. "Target Cost Contracts and The Development of Collaborative Behaviours and Value for Money in The UK Construction Industry," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 4(4), pages 7-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgs:jibrme:v:4:y:2019:i:4:p:7-15
    DOI: 10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.44.3001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/01.-Target-Cost-Contracts-and-The-Development-of-Collaborative-Behaviours.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/target-cost-contracts-development-collaborative-behaviours-value-money-uk-construction-industry/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.44.3001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Bresnen & Nick Marshall, 2000. "Motivation, commitment and the use of incentives in partnerships and alliances," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 587-598.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bidabadi Zahra Toroghi & Hosseinalipour Mujtaba & Hamidizadeh Mohammad Reza & Mohebifar Amirhossein, 2016. "Supply chain collaboration within the Iranian construction industry," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1437-1445, December.
    2. Tackie, David Nii O. & Diabate, Youssouf & Quarcoo, Franklin & Gurung, Nar & Hunter, George, 2023. "Relationships Regarding Incentives, Recordkeeping Propensity, and Selected Factors of Small Producers in Alabama Back Belt and Surrounding Counties," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 9(02), September.
    3. Hao Lu & Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi & Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Dan Tan, 2019. "ICT Implementation of Small- and Medium-Sized Construction Enterprises: Organizational Characteristics, Driving Forces, and Value Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. da Luz Pereira, António & Ramalho, André & Viana, João & Pinto Hespanhol, Alberto & Freitas, Alberto & Biscaia, André, 2021. "The effect of commissioning on Portuguese Primary Health Care units’ performance: A four-year national analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 709-716.
    5. Lauri Koskela & John Rooke & Mohan Siriwardena, 2016. "Evaluation of the Promotion of Through-Life Management in Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Tang, Wenzhe & Li, Zhuoyu & Qiang, Maoshan & Wang, Shuli & Lu, Youmei, 2013. "Risk management of hydropower development in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 316-324.
    7. Per Erik Eriksson, 2010. "Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented?," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(9), pages 905-917.
    8. Yongcheng Fu & Yongqiang Chen & Shuibo Zhang & Wenqian Wang, 2015. "Promoting cooperation in construction projects: an integrated approach of contractual incentive and trust," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 653-670, August.
    9. Rose, Timothy & Manley, Karen, 2011. "Motivation toward financial incentive goals on construction projects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 765-773, July.
    10. Elin Marianne Smith & Anna Thomasson, 2018. "The Use of the Partnering Concept for Public–Private Collaboration: How Well Does it Really Work?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 191-206, June.
    11. Ulrika Badenfelt, 2010. "I trust you, I trust you not: a longitudinal study of control mechanisms in incentive contracts," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 301-310.
    12. Maryam R. Nezami & Mark L. C. de Bruijne & Marcel J. C. M. Hertogh & Hans L. M. Bakker, 2022. "Collaboration and Data Sharing in Inter-Organizational Infrastructure Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Wang, Shuli & Shen, Wenxin & Tang, Wenzhe & Wang, Yunhong & Duffield, Colin F. & Hui, Felix Kin Peng, 2019. "Understanding the social network of stakeholders in hydropower project development: An owners' view," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 326-334.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TCCs; Value for Money; Collaboration; Incentivise; Target cost; Pain/gain;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgs:jibrme:v:4:y:2019:i:4:p:7-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bojan Obrenovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchleap.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.