IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mfa/journl/v31y2023i2p55-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSR Performance and Profitability of the Banking Industry in Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN)

Author

Listed:
  • Berto Usman

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia.)

  • Ridwan Nurazi

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia.)

  • Intan Zoraya

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia.)

  • Nurna Aziza

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia.)

Abstract

Research Question: Is non-financial information in CSR reports associated with the banking profitability? Is CSR performance related to profitability of public banks in ASEAN? Motivation: Literature have provided comprehensive empirical findings with respect to the relationship between CSR performance and its economic consequences for companies operating in the Environmentally Sensitive Industries (ESIs). However, little is known when it comes to the context of Non-Environmentally Sensitive Industries (i.e., banks) in ASEAN. Idea: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CSR performance and profitability in the banking industry of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN), which is of interest to practitioners and academics in accounting finance as it relates to driving a company's value. Data: The study used data from the banking industry of ASEAN (i.e., Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Thailand). Method/Tools: The study used panel data regression analysis to examine observations from 2011 to 2021. The results showed that CSR performance is not positively related to profitability in the banking industry in ASEAN. This was due to the use of CSR information availability and banks' CSR performance scores as the main proxies of CSR performance, which were tested against the banking industry's profitability measured using the market profitability value and the accounting net interest margin. Additionally, the study selected an appropriate model, clustering error standards, and several company-specific attributes as control variables to minimize estimation bias. Findings: The results contravened the proposed hypothesis, necessitating an intellectual discussion and a literature review. This means that CSR practices in the ASEAN banking industry have not met the expectations regarding non-financial information reporting. However, non-financial information reporting is an effort to show the public that the company is operating ethically and sustainably. Additionally, CSR practice is often considered symbolic rather than substantive in the ASEAN banking industry. Contributions: This study is among the first investigating the CSR performance and bank profitability nexus in ASEAN. Thus, it contributes to the new empirical evidence of CSR studies in the Non-Environmentally Sensitive Industry (NESI).

Suggested Citation

  • Berto Usman & Ridwan Nurazi & Intan Zoraya & Nurna Aziza, 2023. "CSR Performance and Profitability of the Banking Industry in Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN)," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 31(2), pages 55-68.
    • Handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:31:y:2023:i:2:p:55-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mfa.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/v31_i2_a3_pg55-68.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Meng-Wen & Shen, Chung-Hua, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3529-3547.
    2. Giovanna Michelon & Silvia Pilonato & Federica Ricceri & Robin W Roberts, 2016. "Behind camouflaging: traditional and innovative theoretical perspectives in social and environmental accounting research," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 2-25, March.
    3. Jan Bebbington & Carlos Larrinaga‐González & Jose M. Moneva‐Abadía, 2008. "Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 371-374, March.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570810863932 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570810863969 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Mark Bagnoli & Susan G. Watts, 2017. "Voluntary Assurance of Voluntary CSR Disclosure," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 205-230, February.
    7. Neu, D. & Warsame, H. & Pedwell, K., 1998. "Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 265-282, April.
    8. Jan Bebbington & Carlos Larrinaga & Jose M. Moneva, 2008. "Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 337-361, March.
    9. Anastasia Axjonow & Jürgen Ernstberger & Christiane Pott, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Reputation: A Non-professional Stakeholder Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 429-450, August.
    10. Hariom Manchiraju & Shivaram Rajgopal, 2017. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Create Shareholder Value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1257-1300, December.
    11. Giovanna Michelon & Silvia Pilonato & Federica Ricceri & Robin W Roberts, 2016. "Behind camouflaging: traditional and innovative theoretical perspectives in social and environmental accounting research," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 2-25, March.
    12. Jan Bebbington & Carlos Larrinaga & Jose M. Moneva, 2008. "Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 337-361, March.
    13. Bohyun Yoon & Jeong Hwan Lee & Ryan Byun, 2018. "Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Claudia Arena & Ronald Liong & Petros Vourvachis, 2018. "Carrot or stick: CSR disclosures by Southeast Asian companies," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 422-454, July.
    15. Jan Bebbington & Carlos Larrinaga‐González & Jose M. Moneva‐Abadía, 2008. "Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 371-374, March.
    16. Claudia Arena & Ronald Liong & Petros Vourvachis, 2018. "Carrot or stick: CSR disclosures by Southeast Asian companies," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 422-454, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles H. Cho & Michele Fabrizi & Silvia Pilonato & Federica Ricceri, 2024. "Not all bad news is harmful to a good reputation: evidence from the most visible companies in the US," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(1), pages 9-36, March.
    2. Andrew Crane & Sarah Glozer, 2016. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1223-1252, November.
    3. Higgins, Colin & Walker, Robyn, 2012. "Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 194-208.
    4. Angus W. H. Yip & William Y. P. Yu, 2023. "The Quality of Environmental KPI Disclosure in ESG Reporting for SMEs in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Yihao Guo & Yanwen Song & Yimin Wang, 2024. "Happy troubles? CSR awards and CSR report quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2989-3005, July.
    6. Rozenn Perrigot & Komlanvi Elom Gbetchi, 2023. "Social franchise chains operating in African countries: are their social goals aligned with the 2030 United Nations sustainable development goals?," Post-Print hal-03715585, HAL.
    7. Michaela Rankin & Carolyn Windsor & Dina Wahyuni, 2011. "An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(8), pages 1037-1070, October.
    8. Łukasz Matuszak & Ewa Różańska, 2019. "A Non-Linear and Disaggregated Approach to Studying the Impact of CSR on Accounting Profitability: Evidence from the Polish Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Craig, Russell J. & Brennan, Niamh M., 2012. "An exploration of the relationship between language choice in CEO letters to shareholders and corporate reputation," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 166-177.
    10. Charles H. Cho & Matias Laine & Robin W. Roberts & Michelle Rodrigue, 2018. "The Frontstage and Backstage of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Bill," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 865-886, October.
    11. Suaini Othman & Faizah Darus & Roshayani Arshad, 2011. "The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 119-135, February.
    12. Prasad, Krishna & Kumar, Satish & Devji, Shridev & Lim, Weng Marc & Prabhu, Nandan & Moodbidri, Sudhir, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and cost of capital: The moderating role of policy intervention," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Sudipta Bose & Amitav Saha & Indra Abeysekera, 2020. "The Value Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure: Evidence from Regulatory Decisions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(4), pages 455-494, December.
    14. Barigozzi, Francesca & Tedeschi, Piero, 2019. "On the credibility of ethical banking," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 381-402.
    15. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2016. "Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Radhakrishnan, Suresh & Tsang, Albert & Liu, Rubing, 2018. "A Corporate Social Responsibility Framework for Accounting Research," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 274-294.
    17. Brunella Arru, 2015. "Indagine sulla comunicazione della responsabilit? sociale delle societ? quotate italiane," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 15-46.
    18. Jones, Michael John, 2011. "The nature, use and impression management of graphs in social and environmental accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 75-89.
    19. Divya Anantharaman & Feng Gao & Hariom Manchiraju, 2022. "Does social responsibility begin at home? The relation between firms’ pension policies and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 76-121, March.
    20. Li, Yuetong & Wang, Xinyi & Zheng, Xiaojia, 2024. "Data assets and corporate sustainable development: evidence from ESG in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CSR; profitability; banking; ASEAN.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:31:y:2023:i:2:p:55-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Capital Market Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.