IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v55y2021i4p1101-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Veblenian Critique of Nelson and Winter’s Evolutionary Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Tae-Hee Jo

Abstract

It is often argued that Richard Nelson and Sydney Winter’s evolutionary theory is an alternative to neoclassical economics and is compatible with or complementary to Veblenian evolutionary economics. This article subjects such arguments to critical examination. I argue that while Nelson and Winter’s theory provides a more realistic account of the firm behavior than Marshallian-neoclassical theory does, it is a neoclassical evolutionary theory in much the same sense as Marshall’s economics is quasi-evolutionary, “neo-classical” economics according to Veblen. Therefore, Nelson and Winter’s evolutionary theory is in fact a protective modification of neoclassical economics and is antithetical to Veblen’s evolutionary economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Tae-Hee Jo, 2021. "A Veblenian Critique of Nelson and Winter’s Evolutionary Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 1101-1117, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:55:y:2021:i:4:p:1101-1117
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2021.1994789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2021.1994789
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2021.1994789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorstein Veblen, 1909. "The Limitations of Marginal Utility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(9), pages 620-620.
    2. Stephen P. Dunn, 2001. "Bounded Rationality Is Not Fundamental Uncertainty: A Post Keynesian Perspective," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 567-587, July.
    3. Tae-Hee Jo, 2019. "The Institutionalist Theory of the Business Enterprise: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 597-611, July.
    4. Frederic S. Lee, 1984. "The Marginalist Controversy and the Demise of Full Cost Pricing," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 1107-1132, December.
    5. Frederic S. Lee, 1990. "Marginalist Controversy and Post Keynesian Price Theory," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 252-263, December.
    6. Ann Jennings & William Waller, 1998. "The Place of Biological Science in Veblen's Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 189-217, Summer.
    7. Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), 2012. "Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13623.
    8. Richard Nelson, 2013. "Demand, supply, and their interaction on markets, as seen from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 17-38, January.
    9. Tony Lawson, 2006. "The nature of heterodox economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 30(4), pages 483-505, July.
    10. Winter, Sidney G., 2014. "The future of evolutionary economics: can we break out of the beachhead?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 613-644, December.
    11. Francisco Louçã & Mark Perlman (ed.), 2000. "Is Economics an Evolutionary Science?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1897.
    12. Tae-Hee Jo & John F. Henry, 2015. "The Business Enterprise in the Age of Money Manager Capitalism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 23-46, January.
    13. Stephen Edgell & Rick Tilman, 1989. "The Intellectual Antecedents of Thorstein Veblen: A Reappraisal," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 1003-1026, December.
    14. Lee, Frederic S, 1981. "The Oxford Challenge to Marshallian Supply and Demand: The History of the Oxford Economists' Research Group," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 339-351, November.
    15. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2013. "Come back Marshall, all is forgiven? Complexity, evolution, mathematics and Marshallian exceptionalism," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 957-981, December.
    16. Vladislav Valentinov, 2013. "Veblen and Instrumental Value: A Systems Theory Perspective," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 673-688.
    17. Foss, Nicolai J, 1998. "The Competence-Based Approach: Veblenian Ideas in the Modern Theory of the Firm," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 22(4), pages 479-495, July.
    18. William M. Dugger, 2006. "Veblen’s Radical Theory of Social Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 651-672, September.
    19. Veblen, Thorstein, 1909. "The Limitations of Marginal Utility," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 17.
    20. Neil Hart, 2012. "Equilibrium and Evolution," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-36117-1, March.
    21. Armin W. Schulz, 2016. "Firms, agency, and evolution," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 57-76, March.
    22. John Watkins, 2010. "Mainstream Efforts to Tell a Better Story - Natural Selection as a Misplaced Metaphor: The Problem of Corporate Power," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 991-1008.
    23. Mayhew, Anne, 1998. "On the Difficulty of Evolutionary Analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 22(4), pages 449-461, July.
    24. Richard R. Nelson, 2007. "Institutions and Economic Growth: Sharpening the Research Agenda," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 313-323, June.
    25. Geoffrey Hodgson & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2004. "The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 281-307, July.
    26. Denise Dollimore & Geoffrey Hodgson, 2014. "Four essays on economic evolution: an introduction," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-10, January.
    27. Neil Hart, 2003. "Marshall’s Dilemma: Equilibrium versus Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1139-1160, December.
    28. Armen A. Alchian, 1950. "Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(3), pages 211-211.
    29. Veblen, Thorstein, 1904. "Theory of Business Enterprise," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1904.
    30. Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft, 2012. "Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm," Post-Print halshs-01378625, HAL.
    31. Nicolai Juul Foss, 1994. "The Biological Analogy and the Theory of the Firm: Marshall and Monopolistic Competition," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 1115-1136, December.
    32. Frederic Lee & Tae-Hee Jo, 2011. "Social Surplus Approach and Heterodox Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 857-876.
    33. Stephen Pratten, 1998. "Marshall on Tendencies, Equilibrium, and the Statical Method," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 121-163, Spring.
    34. Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft, 2012. "The Economics and Theory of the Firm," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    35. Karl L. Anderson, 1933. "The Unity of Veblen's Theoretical System," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 47(4), pages 598-626.
    36. Stephen Edgell, 1975. "Thorstein Veblen's Theory of Evolutionary Change," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 267-280, July.
    37. Frederic Lee & Steve Keen, 2004. "The Incoherent Emperor: A Heterodox Critique of Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 169-199.
    38. John Adams, 1991. "Surplus, Surplus, Who’s Got the Surplus? The Subtractivist Fallacy in Orthodox Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 187-197, March.
    39. William Dugger, 1990. "The New Institutionalism: New But Not Institutionalist," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 423-431, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M’hand Fares & Fateh Mamine, 2023. "Relative Importance of Barriers and Levers to Intercropping Systems Adoption: A Comparison of Farms and Co-Operatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tae-Hee Jo, 2021. "Veblen’s evolutionary methodology and its implications for heterodox economics in the calculable future," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 277-295, July.
    2. Tae-Hee Jo, 2016. "What If There Are No Conventional Price Mechanisms?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 327-344, April.
    3. Valentinov, Vladislav & Roth, Steffen, 2022. "Chester Barnard’s theory of the firm: An institutionalist view," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 707-720.
    4. Tae‐Hee Jo, 2011. "Social Provisioning Process and Socio‐Economic Modeling," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(5), pages 1094-1116, November.
    5. Essiane, Patrick-Nelson Daniel, 2020. "De l'Ancienne Economie Institutionnelle à la Nouvelle Economie Institutionnelle: une introduction à quelques débats [Old Institutional Economics and New Institutional Economics: an Introduction to ," MPRA Paper 102858, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Pattit, Jason M. & Pattit, Katherina G. & Spender, J C, 2021. "Edith T. Penrose: Economist of "The Ordinary Business of Life"," MPRA Paper 106375, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Markus Becker & Thorbjorn Knudsen, 2012. "Nelson and Winter Revisited," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Canarella, Giorgio & Miller, Stephen M., 2018. "The determinants of growth in the U.S. information and communication technology (ICT) industry: A firm-level analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 259-271.
    9. Jo, Tae-Hee, 2016. "A Heterodox Theory of the Business Enterprise," MPRA Paper 72426, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Vicente Ferreira, 2019. "Why Economics Must be an Evolutionary Science," Working Papers Department of Economics 2019/01, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    11. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2012. "Veblen, Commons and the Theory of the Firm," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Viano Francesca Lidia, 2002. "Guesswork and knowledge in evolutionary economics: verblen revisited," CESMEP Working Papers 200205, University of Turin.
    13. Blind, Georg, 2015. "Behavioural rules: Veblen, Nelson-Winter, Oström and beyond," MPRA Paper 66866, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Sophie Urmetzer & Michael P. Schlaile & Kristina B. Bogner & Matthias Mueller & Andreas Pyka, 2018. "Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Transformation towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Brian Loasby, 2012. "Edith Penrose and George Richardson," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Naoise McDonagh, 2021. "Credit Guidance for a Desired Economy: An Original Institutional Economics Critique of Financialization," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 675-693, December.
    17. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2015. "From equilibrium to autopoiesis: A Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 143-155.
    18. Tae-Hee Jo, 2015. "Financing Investment under Fundamental Uncertainty and Instability: A Heterodox Microeconomic View," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 9(1), pages 33-54, June.
    19. Anna Klimina, 2019. "Opening Up Possibilities: Limiting Particularism and Welcoming Convergence on Socially Progressive Goals," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 448-455, April.
    20. Jo, Tae-Hee, 2013. "Uncertainty, Instability, and the Control of Markets," MPRA Paper 47936, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • B25 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:55:y:2021:i:4:p:1101-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.