IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Debreu-féle neowalrasi általános egyensúlyelmélet antiempirista axiomatizmusa
[The anti-empirical axiomatism of neo-Walrasian general equilibrium theory]

Author

Listed:
  • Dusek, Tamás

Abstract

A neoklasszikus közgazdaságtan hívei az általános egyensúlyelmélet Debreu-féle modelljére a gazdaságelmélet csúcsaként tekintenek. Tanulmányom célja az elmélet módszertani hátterének és tapasztalati relevanciájának vizsgálata, különös tekintettel az axiomatikus tárgyalásmód mögött meghúzódó érvekre. Az axiomatikus módszer sikeres alkalmazásaira adott példákat követően bemutatom, hogy semmilyen tartalmi kapcsolat nincs a természettudományok tapasztalati megfigyelésekből származó axiomatizmusa és az általános egyensúlyelmélet halmazelméleti axiomatizmusa között, mert utóbbinak nincsen empirikus tartalma. A tanulmány második részében az elmélet egymástól szélsőségesen eltérő értelmezéseit tekintem át. A téma tárgyalásának jelentőségét az elmélet tartós népszerűsége mellett az adja, hogy az érintett problémák a közgazdaságtan más elméleteiben is előfordulnak. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: B41, D50.

Suggested Citation

  • Dusek, Tamás, 2012. "A Debreu-féle neowalrasi általános egyensúlyelmélet antiempirista axiomatizmusa [The anti-empirical axiomatism of neo-Walrasian general equilibrium theory]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 988-1004.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1334
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226320625 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Leonidas Montes, 2003. "Smith and Newton: some methodological issues concerning general economic equilibrium theory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 27(5), pages 723-747, September.
    3. Arrow, Kenneth J, 1974. "Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(1), pages 1-10, March.
    4. K. Vela Velupillai, 2005. "The unreasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics in economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 29(6), pages 849-872, November.
    5. repec:bla:scandj:v:86:y:1984:i:1:p:4-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Arthur M. Diamond, Jr., 1988. "The Empirical Progressiveness of the General Equilibrium Research Program," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 119-135, Spring.
    7. repec:bla:kyklos:v:34:y:1981:i:3:p:377-87 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Galbács, Péter, 2018. "A közgazdaságtan felszabadítása. A neoklasszikus ortodoxia és az intézményi közgazdaságtan közötti ellentét néhány módszertani kérdése [Freedom for economics. Some methodological aspects of the neo," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 44-65.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William S. Schulze & Michael H. Lubatkin & Richard N. Dino, 2002. "Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 247-259.
    2. repec:zbw:rwirep:0352 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Qin, Wei & Liang, Quanxi & Jiao, Yan & Lu, Meiting & Shan, Yaowen, 2022. "Social trust and dividend payouts: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Bartholo, R.S. & Cosenza, C.A.N. & Doria, F.A. & de Lessa, C.T.R., 2009. "Can economic systems be seen as computing devices?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 72-80, May.
    5. Nathalie Berta, 2016. "On the definition of externality as a missing market," Post-Print halshs-01277990, HAL.
    6. Olivier Favereau, 1989. "Marchés internes, marchés externes," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 40(2), pages 273-328.
    7. Keisuke Kawata & Mizuki Komura, 2015. "The Gender Division of Labor: A Joint Marriage and Job Search Model," IDEC DP2 Series 5-1, Hiroshima University, Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC).
    8. Russell Cooper, 1984. "Insurance, Flexibility and Non-contingent Trades," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 691, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    9. Jeffrey M. Lacker, 1991. "Why is there debt?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 77(Jul), pages 3-19.
    10. Arnaud Costinot & Lindsay Oldenski & James Rauch, 2011. "Adaptation and the Boundary of Multinational Firms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(1), pages 298-308, February.
    11. Nathalie Berta, 2016. "On the definition of externality as a missing market," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16007, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    12. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2011. "Primary and secondary markets," MPRA Paper 32996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Guglielmo Chiodi, 2012. "On Richard Goodwin’s Elementary Economics from the Higher Standpoint," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1219, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    14. Kenny, Charles & Williams, David, 2001. "What Do We Know About Economic Growth? Or, Why Don't We Know Very Much?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Jacques Rojot, 2002. "Economics and Management Theory: New Developments in France," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 283-294.
    16. Lauwers, Luc, 2010. "Ordering infinite utility streams comes at the cost of a non-Ramsey set," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 32-37, January.
    17. Pooran Lall & David Norman & Allen Featherstone, 2003. "Determinants of US direct foreign investment in the Caribbean," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(13), pages 1485-1496.
    18. Roumasset, James A. & Simons, Scott, 1986. "A Transaction Cost Model Of Formal And Informal Markets For Rural Credit," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278055, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Jeffrey Lacker, 2001. "Collateralized Debt as the Optimal Contract," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 4(4), pages 842-859, October.
    20. Ben‐chieh Liu & Thomas Mulvey & Chang‐Tzeh Hsieh, 1986. "Effects of Educational Expenditures on Regional Inequality in the Social Quality of Life," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 131-144, April.
    21. Ramakrishnan, Ram T. S. & Thakor, Anjan V., 1982. "Moral Hazard, Agency Costs, and Asset Prices in a Competitive Equilibrium," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 503-532, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.