IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v50y2023i1d10.1007_s11116-021-10238-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved imputation of rule sets in class association rule modeling: application to transportation mode choice

Author

Listed:
  • Jiajia Zhang

    (Dalian Maritime University
    Eindhoven University of Technology)

  • Tao Feng

    (Eindhoven University of Technology
    Hiroshima University)

  • Harry Timmermans

    (Eindhoven University of Technology
    Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Zhengkui Lin

    (Dalian Maritime University)

Abstract

Predicting transportation mode choice is a critical component of forecasting travel demand. Recently, machine learning methods have become increasingly more popular in predicting transportation mode choice. Class association rules (CARs) have been applied to transportation mode choice, but the application of the imputed rules for prediction remains a long-standing challenge. Based on CARs, this paper proposes a new rule merging approach, called CARM, to improve predictive accuracy. In the suggested approach, first, CARs are imputed from the frequent pattern tree (FP-tree) based on the frequent pattern growth (FP-growth) algorithm. Next, the rules are pruned based on the concept of pessimistic error rate. Finally, the rules are merged to form new rules without increasing predictive error. Using the 2015 Dutch National Travel Survey, the performance of suggested model is compared with the performance of CARIG that uses the information gain statistic to generate new rules, class-based association rules (CBA), decision trees (DT) and the multinomial logit (MNL) model. In addition, the proposed model is assessed using a ten-fold cross validation test. The results show that the accuracy of the proposed model is 91.1%, which outperforms CARIG, CBA, DT and the MNL model.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiajia Zhang & Tao Feng & Harry Timmermans & Zhengkui Lin, 2023. "Improved imputation of rule sets in class association rule modeling: application to transportation mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 63-106, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:50:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-021-10238-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-021-10238-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-021-10238-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-021-10238-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Joon-Kyu & Yoo, Kwang-Eui & Song, Ki-Han, 2016. "A study on travelers' transport mode choice behavior using the mixed logit model: A case study of the Seoul-Jeju route," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(PB), pages 131-137.
    2. Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J. P., 2004. "A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 613-633, August.
    3. Hensher, David A. & Ton, Tu T., 2000. "A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 155-172, September.
    4. Jarad Beckman & Konstadinos Goulias, 2008. "Immigration, residential location, car ownership, and commuting behavior: a multivariate latent class analysis from California," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-671, August.
    5. Zhan, Guangjun & Yan, Xuedong & Zhu, Shanjiang & Wang, Yun, 2016. "Using hierarchical tree-based regression model to examine university student travel frequency and mode choice patterns in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 55-65.
    6. Mohammad Hesam Hafezi & Lei Liu & Hugh Millward, 2019. "A time-use activity-pattern recognition model for activity-based travel demand modeling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1369-1394, August.
    7. Diana Kusumastuti & Els Hannes & Davy Janssens & Geert Wets & Benedict Dellaert, 2010. "Scrutinizing individuals’ leisure-shopping travel decisions to appraise activity-based models of travel demand," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 647-661, July.
    8. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry & Yang, Dujuan, 2018. "Estimating panel effects in probabilistic representations of dynamic decision trees using bayesian generalized linear mixture models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 168-184.
    9. Marcel Paulssen & Dirk Temme & Akshay Vij & Joan Walker, 2014. "Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 873-888, July.
    10. Li, Linchao & Zhu, Jiasong & Zhang, Hailong & Tan, Huachun & Du, Bowen & Ran, Bin, 2020. "Coupled application of generative adversarial networks and conventional neural networks for travel mode detection using GPS data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 282-292.
    11. Zheng Zhu & Xiqun Chen & Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2018. "A mixed Bayesian network for two-dimensional decision modeling of departure time and mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1499-1522, September.
    12. Tao Feng & Harry J.P. Timmermans, 2016. "Comparison of advanced imputation algorithms for detection of transportation mode and activity episode using GPS data," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 180-194, March.
    13. Liang Tang & Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2015. "Decision tree method for modeling travel mode switching in a dynamic behavioral process," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 833-850, December.
    14. Koppelman, Frank S. & Sethi, Vaneet, 2005. "Incorporating variance and covariance heterogeneity in the Generalized Nested Logit model: an application to modeling long distance travel choice behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 825-853, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuli Wen & Xin Chen, 2025. "A New Breakthrough in Travel Behavior Modeling Using Deep Learning: A High-Accuracy Prediction Method Based on a CNN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Pengfang & Zhang, Xiaoqiang & Gao, Dongsheng, 2024. "Preference heterogeneity analysis on train choice behaviour of high-speed railway passengers: A case study in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Liang Tang & Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2015. "Decision tree method for modeling travel mode switching in a dynamic behavioral process," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 833-850, December.
    3. Wang, Shenhao & Mo, Baichuan & Zheng, Yunhan & Hess, Stephane & Zhao, Jinhua, 2024. "Comparing hundreds of machine learning and discrete choice models for travel demand modeling: An empirical benchmark," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Aghaabbasi, Mahdi & Shekari, Zohreh Asadi & Shah, Muhammad Zaly & Olakunle, Oloruntobi & Armaghani, Danial Jahed & Moeinaddini, Mehdi, 2020. "Predicting the use frequency of ride-sourcing by off-campus university students through random forest and Bayesian network techniques," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 262-281.
    5. Sun, Zhiyuan & Wang, Duo & Wang, Jianyu & Han, Lu & Xing, Yuxuan & Lu, Huapu & Chen, Yanyan, 2024. "Influence factors on travel mode preference of working residents living far away from downtown area on workdays: A hybrid method integrating random parameter logit model and Apriori algorithm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Zheng Zhu & Xiqun Chen & Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2018. "A mixed Bayesian network for two-dimensional decision modeling of departure time and mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1499-1522, September.
    7. Hong, Ye & Stüdeli, Emanuel & Raubal, Martin, 2023. "Evaluating geospatial context information for travel mode detection," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. S. Van Cranenburgh & S. Wang & A. Vij & F. Pereira & J. Walker, 2021. "Choice modelling in the age of machine learning -- discussion paper," Papers 2101.11948, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    9. Smeele, Nicholas V.R. & Chorus, Caspar G. & Schermer, Maartje H.N. & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2023. "Towards machine learning for moral choice analysis in health economics: A literature review and research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    10. Wang, Shenhao & Wang, Qingyi & Bailey, Nate & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "Deep neural networks for choice analysis: A statistical learning theory perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 60-81.
    11. Koo, Tay T.R. & Wu, Cheng-Lung (Richard) & Dwyer, Larry, 2010. "Ground travel mode choices of air arrivals at regional destinations: The significance of tourism attributes and destination contexts," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 44-53.
    12. Feng Liu & Tom Bellemans & Davy Janssens & Geert Wets & Muhammad Adnan, 2024. "A Methodological Approach for Enriching Activity–Travel Schedules with In-Home Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Ozonder, Gozde & Miller, Eric J., 2021. "Longitudinal investigation of skeletal activity episode timing decisions – A copula approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    14. Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry, 2007. "Parametric action decision trees: Incorporating continuous attribute variables into rule-based models of discrete choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 772-783, August.
    15. Theo A. Arentze & Benedict G. C. Dellaert & Caspar G. Chorus, 2015. "Incorporating Mental Representations in Discrete Choice Models of Travel Behavior: Modeling Approach and Empirical Application," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 577-590, August.
    16. Nijkamp, Peter & Reggiani, Aura & Tsang, Wai Fai, 2004. "Comparative modelling of interregional transport flows: Applications to multimodal European freight transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 584-602, June.
    17. Zhu, Zheng & Qin, Xiaoran & Ke, Jintao & Zheng, Zhengfei & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Analysis of multi-modal commute behavior with feeding and competing ridesplitting services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 713-727.
    18. Schouten, Andrew & Blumenberg, Evelyn, 2024. "License to drive: State driver’s licensing laws and the travel of unauthorized immigrants," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    19. Marcela Munizaga & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Paulina Greeven & Chandra Bhat, 2008. "Econometric Calibration of the Joint Time Assignment--Mode Choice Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 208-219, May.
    20. Aydın Alptekinoğlu & John H. Semple, 2016. "The Exponomial Choice Model: A New Alternative for Assortment and Price Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 79-93, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:50:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-021-10238-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.