IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v32y2021i3d10.1007_s11002-021-09585-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond perception: the role of gender across marketing scholars’ careers, in reply to Galak and Kahn (2021)

Author

Listed:
  • Ethan Pew

    (Columbia University)

  • César Zamudio

    (Virginia Commonwealth University)

  • Hua (Meg) Meng

    (Longwood University)

Abstract

Galak and Kahn (2021), in their recent contribution on the organizational climate in Marketing academia, highlight important transgressions perceived by women and under-represented minorities. By focusing on gender, this article complements, and supports, the findings of Galak and Kahn (2021). Three analyses examine key points throughout Marketing scholars’ careers including perceptions prior to the job market, objective career outcomes across all scholars, and promotion decisions among quantitative scholars. Our findings suggest that beyond perception, women may experience reduced job mobility (across all sub-areas) and a lower chance to tenure (in the quantitative sub-area) despite having a comparable research record to men. Suggestions to improve organizational climate are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ethan Pew & César Zamudio & Hua (Meg) Meng, 2021. "Beyond perception: the role of gender across marketing scholars’ careers, in reply to Galak and Kahn (2021)," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 313-323, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:32:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-021-09585-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-021-09585-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-021-09585-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-021-09585-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. César Zamudio & Meg Meng, 2015. "Which Modeling Scholars Get Promoted, and How Fast?," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 91-104, March.
    2. Jeff Galak & Barbara E. Kahn, 2021. "2019 Academic Marketing Climate Survey: motivation, results, and recommendations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 275-297, September.
    3. Heather Sarsons, 2017. "Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 141-145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeff Galak & Barbara E. Kahn, 2021. "2019 Academic Marketing Climate Survey: response to commentaries," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 349-350, September.
    2. Chiara Corvino & Amalia De Leo & Miriam Parise & Giulia Buscicchio, 2022. "Organizational Well-Being of Italian Doctoral Students: Is Academia Sustainable When It Comes to Gender Equality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Aparna A. Labroo & Natalie Mizik & Russell S. Winer, 2021. "Introduction to special issue on gender and ethnicity in the marketing professoriate," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 273-274, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adnan, Wifag & Arin, K. Peren & Charness, Gary & Lacomba, Juan A. & Lagos, Francisco, 2022. "Which social categories matter to people: An experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 125-145.
    2. Marlene Kim, 2023. "The Problem of Gender in Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 639-650, December.
    3. Donna K. Ginther & Rina Na, 2021. "Does Mentoring Increase the Collaboration Networks of Female Economists? An Evaluation of the CeMENT Randomized Trial," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 80-85, May.
    4. Rodrigo Dorantes-Gilardi & Aurora A. Ramírez-Álvarez & Diana Terrazas-Santamaría, 2023. "Is there a differentiated gender effect of collaboration with super-cited authors? Evidence from junior researchers in economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2317-2336, April.
    5. Helena Fornwagner & Monika Pompeo & Nina Serdarevic, 2023. "Choosing Competition on Behalf of Someone Else," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1555-1574, March.
    6. Coffman, Katherine & Flikkema, Clio Bryant & Shurchkov, Olga, 2021. "Gender stereotypes in deliberation and team decisions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 329-349.
    7. Ruomeng Cui & Hao Ding & Feng Zhu, 2020. "Gender Inequality in Research Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Papers 2006.10194, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    8. Baltrunaite, Audinga & Casarico, Alessandra & Rizzica, Lucia, 2022. "Women in economics: the role of gendered references at entry in the profession," CEPR Discussion Papers 17474, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Christopher F. Karpowitz & Stephen D. O’Connell & Jessica Preece & Olga Stoddard, 2024. "Strength in Numbers? Gender Composition, Leadership, and Women’s Influence in Teams," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(9), pages 3077-3114.
    10. Helena Fornwagner & Monika Pompeo & Nina Serdarevic, 2020. "Him or her? Choosing competition on behalf of someone else," Discussion Papers 2020-13, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    11. Chauvin, Juan Pablo & Tricaud, Clemence, 2022. "Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12411, Inter-American Development Bank.
    12. Davies, Benjamin, 2022. "Gender sorting among economists: Evidence from the NBER," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Chiara Corvino & Amalia De Leo & Miriam Parise & Giulia Buscicchio, 2022. "Organizational Well-Being of Italian Doctoral Students: Is Academia Sustainable When It Comes to Gender Equality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas Augusto van der Velde & Magdalena Smyk, 2024. "Gender-neutral hiring of junior scholars," GRAPE Working Papers 94, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    15. Shoshana Grossbard & Tansel Yilmazer & Lingrui Zhang, 2018. "The Gender Gap in Citations: Lessons from Demographic Economics Journals," Working Papers 2018-078, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    16. repec:cge:wacage:518 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jose Uribe & Seth Carnahan & John Meluso & Jesse Austin‐Breneman, 2022. "How do managers evaluate individual contributions to team production? A theory and empirical test," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2577-2601, December.
    18. Rodrigo Dorantes-Gilardi & Aurora A. Ramírez-Álvarez & Diana Terrazas-Santamaría, 2021. "Is there a differentiated gender effect of collaboration with supercited authors? Evidence from early-career economists," Serie documentos de trabajo del Centro de Estudios Económicos 2021-05, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos.
    19. Leah Boustan & Andrew Langan, 2019. "Variation in Women's Success across PhD Programs in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 23-42, Winter.
    20. Jiafu An & Difang Huang & Chen Lin & Mingzhu Tai, 2024. "Measuring Gender and Racial Biases in Large Language Models," Papers 2403.15281, arXiv.org.
    21. Cory Koedel & Trang Pham, 2023. "The Narrowing Gender Wage Gap Among Faculty at Public Universities in the U.S," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:32:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11002-021-09585-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.