Author
Abstract
As economic downturns and social uncertainties arise domestically and globally, the capability to cope with financial emergencies and adversities, known as financial resilience, becomes increasingly crucial. It needs particular attention when those developmental risks impact individuals and families at the micro level. However, existing studies mainly explored financial resilience at a macro level, using simple indicators, and in developed countries. These prevent us from understanding and improving people’s financial well-being and its predictors both theoretically and practically. This study aims to fill these research gaps in conceptualization, measurement, and context for the first time. It builds upon relevant theories on resilience, financial well-being, intersectionality, and China’s context to develop and examine a financial resilience conceptual framework. The framework comprises four components: current asset, financial access, financial literacy, and social capital. It also includes four levels ranging from financially vulnerable to low, moderate, and high financially resilient. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies, this study provided an overview of family financial resilience in mainland China. One-fifth of the sampled 3710 families were financially vulnerable or low resilient. Fifteen demographic and socioeconomic determinants, except for region and sex, were significantly associated with financial resilience. The study further identified four combined scenarios featuring benchmarks, cumulative risk factors, and protective factors. These findings have implications for targeted policies and services on financial resilience enhancement, poverty alleviation, and sustainable development in countries with developmental risks. It inspires new perspectives for finance and family studies and suggests specific directions for financial well-being research.
Suggested Citation
Zewei Liu & Ji-Kang Chen, 2024.
"Financial Resilience in China: Conceptual Framework, Risk and Protective Factors, and Empirical Evidence,"
Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 852-875, December.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:45:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10834-023-09943-7
DOI: 10.1007/s10834-023-09943-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:45:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10834-023-09943-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.