IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/iaecre/v8y2002i3p215-22010.1007-bf02297959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Income inequality analysis in the period of economic transformation in poland

Author

Listed:
  • Czeslaw Domański
  • Alina Jedrzejczak

Abstract

This paper presents some statistical methods of income inequality analysis based on the theoretical income distribution models that are well-fitted to the empirical models. As theoretical curves, the lognormal, gamma, Burr Type XII, and the Dagum models were used. They were applied to the earnings distributions in Poland in the period of economic transformation from a centrally-planned to a market economy. On the basis of the Dagum model, showing the perfect consistency with the considered earnings distributions, the maximun likelihood estimators of inequality parameters and economic distance ratios between men and women were calculated. Copyright International Atlantic Economic Society 2002

Suggested Citation

  • Czeslaw Domański & Alina Jedrzejczak, 2002. "Income inequality analysis in the period of economic transformation in poland," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 8(3), pages 215-220, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:8:y:2002:i:3:p:215-220:10.1007/bf02297959
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02297959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02297959
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02297959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    2. Gastwirth, Joseph L, 1972. "The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 54(3), pages 306-316, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Kleiber, 2008. "A Guide to the Dagum Distributions," Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion, and Well-Being, in: Duangkamon Chotikapanich (ed.), Modeling Income Distributions and Lorenz Curves, chapter 6, pages 97-117, Springer.
    2. Michał Brzeziński, 2013. "Parametric Modelling of Income Distribution in Central and Eastern Europe," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 5(3), pages 207-230, September.
    3. Alina Jȩdrzejczak & Dorota Pekasiewicz & Wojciech Zieliński, 2023. "The shortest confidence interval for the ratio of quantiles of the Dagum distribution," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 21(2), pages 499-509, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Luo & Bao-zhen Li, 2022. "Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Consumption Inequality in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 529-553, September.
    2. Daranrat Jaitiang & Wen-Chi Huang & Shang-Ho Yang, 2021. "Does Income Inequality Exist among Urban Farmers? A Demonstration of Lorenz Curves from Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Ochnio Luiza & Rokicki Tomasz & Koszela Grzegorz & Klepacki Bogdan, 2019. "Diversification of Lamb Meat Imports in EU Countries and its Trends," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 23(4), pages 96-111, December.
    4. Giorgio Di Maio & Paolo Landoni, 2015. "Beyond the Gini index: Measuring inequality with the Balance of Inequality index," a/ Working Papers Series 1506, Italian Association for the Study of Economic Asymmetries, Rome (Italy).
    5. Bogdan Oancea & Dan Pirjol, 2019. "Extremal properties of the Theil and Gini measures of inequality," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 859-869, March.
    6. Bouvier, Rachel, 2014. "Distribution of income and toxic emissions in Maine, United States: Inequality in two dimensions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 39-47.
    7. Boisvert, Richard N. & Ranney, Christine K., 1991. "The Budgetary Implications of Reducing U.S. Income Inequality Through Income Transfer Programs," Research Bulletins 123104, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    8. Michael C. Lovell, 1999. "Inequality Within and Among Nations," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 8(1), pages 1-1, June.
    9. Alfred Ultsch & Jörn Lötsch, 2017. "A data science based standardized Gini index as a Lorenz dominance preserving measure of the inequality of distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Mihaela Paun, 2008. "Review Of Inequality Metrics With Application In Income Inequality In Louisiana," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 3(3), pages 82-88, September.
    11. Pinkovskiy, Maxim L., 2013. "World welfare is rising: Estimation using nonparametric bounds on welfare measures," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 176-195.
    12. Louis Mesnard, 2022. "About some difficulties with the functional forms of Lorenz curves," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(4), pages 939-950, December.
    13. Stéphane Mussard, 2006. "La décomposition des mesures d’inégalité en sources de revenu : l’indice de Gini et les généralisations," Cahiers de recherche 06-05, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    14. David Murray, 1981. "The Inequality of Household Incomes in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 57(1), pages 12-22, March.
    15. López-García, Hortensia & López-Díaz, Miguel & Gil, María Angeles, 2000. "Interval-valued quantification of the inequality associated with a random set," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 149-159, January.
    16. Gholamreza Hajargasht & William E. Griffiths, 2016. "Inference for Lorenz Curves," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 2022, The University of Melbourne.
    17. Yang Wei & Zhouping Li & Yunqiu Dai, 2022. "Unified smoothed jackknife empirical likelihood tests for comparing income inequality indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 1415-1475, October.
    18. Oihana Aristondo & JosŽ Luis Garc’a-Lapresta & Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ricardo Alberto Marques Pereira, 2012. "Classical inequality indices, welfare functions, and the dual decomposition," DISA Working Papers 2012/06, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised Jun 2012.
    19. Malghan, Deepak, 2010. "On the relationship between scale, allocation, and distribution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2261-2270, September.
    20. Michel Sollogoub, 1988. "L'inégalité des revenus primaires en France de 1962 à 1979," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 39(3), pages 545-572.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:8:y:2002:i:3:p:215-220:10.1007/bf02297959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.