IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ejlwec/v58y2024i2d10.1007_s10657-024-09816-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nudging law enforcement: evidence from low priority initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory DeAngelo

    (Claremont Graduate University)

  • Rainita Narender

    (Claremont Graduate University)

  • Rustam Romaniuc

    (Montpellier Business School)

Abstract

The effect of non-binding guidelines (nudges) on citizens’ compliance with law has been studied theoretically and empirically in behavioral law and economics. Less is known about the impact of non-binding guidelines on the behavior of law enforcement agents and prosecution. Our work fills this gap. We study whether non-binding guidelines affect law enforcement and prosecution practices when the guidelines are not necessarily aligned with legal actors’ preferences. Our empirical analysis focuses on the impact of the adoption of a low priority initiative (LPI) on police and prosecutor behavior in Los Angeles County. Our results suggest that following the introduction of an LPI there is a rise in the number of misdemeanor arrests, but not in the rate that misdemeanor marijuana offenses are dismissed. We conclude that law enforcement preferences have a counterbalancing effect given that police officers may have strong punitive preferences. Prosecutors do not appear to respond to non-binding guidelines as evidenced by no change in the rate of dismissing cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory DeAngelo & Rainita Narender & Rustam Romaniuc, 2024. "Nudging law enforcement: evidence from low priority initiatives," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 321-354, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:58:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-024-09816-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10657-024-09816-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10657-024-09816-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10657-024-09816-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:58:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10657-024-09816-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.