IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v56y2020i4d10.1007_s10614-019-09947-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast Monte Carlo Simulation for Pricing Equity-Linked Securities

Author

Listed:
  • Hanbyeol Jang

    (Korea University)

  • Sangkwon Kim

    (Korea University)

  • Junhee Han

    (Korea University)

  • Seongjin Lee

    (Korea University)

  • Jungyup Ban

    (Korea University)

  • Hyunsoo Han

    (Korea University)

  • Chaeyoung Lee

    (Korea University)

  • Darae Jeong

    (Kangwon National University)

  • Junseok Kim

    (Korea University)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a fast Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) algorithm for pricing equity-linked securities (ELS). The ELS is one of the most popular and complex financial derivatives in South Korea. We consider a step-down ELS with a knock-in barrier. This derivative has several intermediate and final automatic redemptions when the underlying asset satisfies certain conditions. If these conditions are not satisfied until the expiry date, then it will be checked whether the stock path hits the knock-in barrier. The payoff is given depending on whether the path hits the knock-in barrier. In the proposed algorithm, we first generate a stock path for redemption dates only. If the generated stock path does not satisfy the early redemption conditions and is not below the knock-in barrier at the redemption dates, then we regenerate a daily path using Brownian bridge. We present numerical algorithms for one-, two-, and three-asset step-down ELS. The computational results demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed fast MCS algorithm. The proposed fast MCS approach is more than 20 times faster than the conventional standard MCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanbyeol Jang & Sangkwon Kim & Junhee Han & Seongjin Lee & Jungyup Ban & Hyunsoo Han & Chaeyoung Lee & Darae Jeong & Junseok Kim, 2020. "Fast Monte Carlo Simulation for Pricing Equity-Linked Securities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 865-882, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:56:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-019-09947-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-019-09947-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-019-09947-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-019-09947-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyle, Phelim & Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Monte Carlo methods for security pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1267-1321, June.
    2. Shiraya, Kenichiro & Takahashi, Akihiko, 2017. "A general control variate method for multi-dimensional SDEs: An application to multi-asset options under local stochastic volatility with jumps models in finance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 358-371.
    3. Ghafarian, Bahareh & Hanafizadeh, Payam & Qahi, Amir Hossein Mortazavi, 2018. "Applying Greek letters to robust option price modeling by binomial-tree," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 632-639.
    4. R. Kalantari & S. Shahmorad, 2019. "A Stable and Convergent Finite Difference Method for Fractional Black–Scholes Model of American Put Option Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 191-205, January.
    5. Darae Jeong & Minhyun Yoo & Junseok Kim, 2018. "Finite Difference Method for the Black–Scholes Equation Without Boundary Conditions," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 961-972, April.
    6. Tsai, I-Chun, 2017. "The source of global stock market risk: A viewpoint of economic policy uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 122-131.
    7. Paolo Baldi & Lucia Caramellino & Maria Gabriella Iovino, 1999. "Pricing General Barrier Options: A Numerical Approach Using Sharp Large Deviations," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 293-321, October.
    8. Boyle, Phelim P., 1977. "Options: A Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 323-338, May.
    9. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Paletta, Tommaso & Tunaru, Radu, 2017. "An improved least squares Monte Carlo valuation method based on heteroscedasticity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 698-706.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sangkwon Kim & Jisang Lyu & Wonjin Lee & Eunchae Park & Hanbyeol Jang & Chaeyoung Lee & Junseok Kim, 2024. "A Practical Monte Carlo Method for Pricing Equity-Linked Securities with Time-Dependent Volatility and Interest Rate," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(5), pages 2069-2086, May.
    2. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2023. "Evaluation of Non-survey Methods for the Construction of Regional Input–Output Matrices When There is Partial Historical Information," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1173-1205, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grosen, Anders & Lochte Jorgensen, Peter, 2000. "Fair valuation of life insurance liabilities: The impact of interest rate guarantees, surrender options, and bonus policies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 37-57, February.
    2. E. Nasakkala & J. Keppo, 2008. "Hydropower with Financial Information," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5-6), pages 503-529.
    3. Shuai Gao & Jun Zhao, 2016. "Pricing 50ETF in the Way of American Options Based on Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation," Applied Finance and Accounting, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 71-76, August.
    4. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    5. Aintablian, Sebouh & Khoury, Wissam El, 2017. "A simulation on the presence of competing bidders in mergers and acquisitions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 233-243.
    6. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    7. Lu, Ziqiang & Zhu, Yuanguo & Li, Bo, 2019. "Critical value-based Asian option pricing model for uncertain financial markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 694-703.
    8. Darae Jeong & Minhyun Yoo & Changwoo Yoo & Junseok Kim, 2019. "A Hybrid Monte Carlo and Finite Difference Method for Option Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 111-124, January.
    9. Tak Kuen Siu & Robert J. Elliott, 2019. "Hedging Options In A Doubly Markov-Modulated Financial Market Via Stochastic Flows," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-41, December.
    10. Valeriy Ryabchenko & Sergey Sarykalin & Stan Uryasev, 2004. "Pricing European Options by Numerical Replication: Quadratic Programming with Constraints," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 11(3), pages 301-333, September.
    11. Nelson Areal & Artur Rodrigues & Manuel Armada, 2008. "On improving the least squares Monte Carlo option valuation method," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151, March.
    12. Jin, Xing & Li, Xun & Tan, Hwee Huat & Wu, Zhenyu, 2013. "A computationally efficient state-space partitioning approach to pricing high-dimensional American options via dimension reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 362-370.
    13. Michael A. Kouritzin, 2016. "Explicit Heston Solutions and Stochastic Approximation for Path-dependent Option Pricing," Papers 1608.02028, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    14. John Board & Charles Sutcliffe & William T. Ziemba, 2003. "Applying Operations Research Techniques to Financial Markets," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 12-24, April.
    15. Manuel Moreno & Javier Navas, 2003. "On the Robustness of Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for Pricing American Derivatives," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 107-128, May.
    16. Cvitanic, Jaksa & Goukasian, Levon & Zapatero, Fernando, 2003. "Monte Carlo computation of optimal portfolios in complete markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 971-986, April.
    17. Lars Stentoft, 2013. "American option pricing using simulation with an application to the GARCH model," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 5, pages 114-147, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Zbigniew Palmowski & Tomasz Serafin, 2020. "A Note on Simulation Pricing of π -Options," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Jin-Chuan Duan & Geneviève Gauthier & Jean-Guy Simonato, 2001. "Asymptotic Distribution of the EMS Option Price Estimator," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1122-1132, August.
    20. Dibeh, Ghassan & Harmanani, Haidar M., 2007. "Option pricing during post-crash relaxation times," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 380(C), pages 357-365.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:56:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-019-09947-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.