IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v53y2019i4d10.1007_s10614-018-9826-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Risk-Based Approach for American Basket Option Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Ehsan Hajizadeh

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Masoud Mahootchi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

Abstract

Options are one of the important financial contracts for reducing the risk of investors. Many active practitioners in the financial markets really believe that mispricing or incorrect valuation of these securities would be the main reason of collapse of some financial institutions. The complexity of option pricing/valuation, especially in the case of American basket options, as high dimensional options, has motivated many researchers to develop numerical and simulation-based models. In this paper, a new simulation-based approach for pricing/valuation of American basket option with risk consideration is proposed. Having the prices obtained through Longstaff–Schwartz methodology, which is based on Approximate Dynamic Programming as a risk-neutral approach, we propose a new approach for pricing the American basket option according to the worst-case (pessimistic/risk-averse) and the best-case (optimistic/risk-taking) scenarios. Furthermore, for scenarios generation, we use a Monte Carlo simulation technique using a t-student copula-GARCH method and Extreme Value Theory to handle the nonlinearity of dependencies between variables. To verify the computational efficiency and the accuracy of the proposed methodology, we compare the results of prices obtained through the proposed models with those achieved through the Monte Carlo simulation and the method developed by Ju for European basket options. Moreover, the developed models are tested using out-sample scenarios to explore what would happen if investors bought the option with the obtained prices through three different strategies: risk-averse, risk-neutral, and risk-taking approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehsan Hajizadeh & Masoud Mahootchi, 2019. "Developing a Risk-Based Approach for American Basket Option Pricing," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 1593-1612, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:53:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-018-9826-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-018-9826-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-018-9826-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-018-9826-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    2. Jing-Zhi Huang & Marti G. Subrahmanyam & G. George Yu, 1999. "Pricing And Hedging American Options: A Recursive Integration Method," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Marco Avellaneda (ed.), Quantitative Analysis In Financial Markets Collected Papers of the New York University Mathematical Finance Seminar, chapter 8, pages 219-239, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    4. Robert Elliott & Tak Siu, 2011. "A risk-based approach for pricing American options under a generalized Markov regime-switching model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(11), pages 1633-1646.
    5. Ruggero Caldana & Gianluca Fusai & Alessandro Gnoatto & Martino Grasselli, 2016. "General closed-form basket option pricing bounds," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 535-554, April.
    6. Li, Meng & Yang, Liang, 2013. "Modeling the volatility of futures return in rubber and oil—A Copula-based GARCH model approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 576-581.
    7. Breen, Richard, 1991. "The Accelerated Binomial Option Pricing Model," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 153-164, June.
    8. McNeil, Alexander J. & Frey, Rudiger, 2000. "Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: an extreme value approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3-4), pages 271-300, November.
    9. Stentoft, Lars, 2011. "American option pricing with discrete and continuous time models: An empirical comparison," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 880-902.
    10. Rama Cont & Ekaterina Voltchkova, 2005. "A Finite Difference Scheme for Option Pricing in Jump Diffusion and Exponential Lévy Models," Post-Print halshs-00445645, HAL.
    11. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    12. Ben-Ameur, Hatem & Breton, Michele & Karoui, Lotfi & L'Ecuyer, Pierre, 2007. "A dynamic programming approach for pricing options embedded in bonds," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 2212-2233, July.
    13. O. Samimi & Z. Mardani & S. Sharafpour & F. Mehrdoust, 2017. "LSM Algorithm for Pricing American Option Under Heston–Hull–White’s Stochastic Volatility Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 173-187, August.
    14. Leandro Maciel & Fernando Gomide & Rosangela Ballini, 2016. "Evolving Fuzzy-GARCH Approach for Financial Volatility Modeling and Forecasting," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 379-398, October.
    15. Tian, Shuairu & Hamori, Shigeyuki, 2015. "Modeling interest rate volatility: A Realized GARCH approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 158-171.
    16. Bandi, Chaithanya & Bertsimas, Dimitris, 2014. "Robust option pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 842-853.
    17. Barraquand, Jérôme & Martineau, Didier, 1995. "Numerical Valuation of High Dimensional Multivariate American Securities," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 383-405, September.
    18. Gagliardini, Patrick & Ronchetti, Diego, 2013. "Semi-parametric estimation of American option prices," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 57-82.
    19. Lian, Yu-Min & Liao, Szu-Lang & Chen, Jun-Home, 2015. "State-dependent jump risks for American gold futures option pricing," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 115-133.
    20. Jèôme Barraquand, 1995. "Numerical Valuation of High Dimensional Multivariate European Securities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1882-1891, December.
    21. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    22. Jaksa Cvitanic & Fernando Zapatero, 2004. "Introduction to the Economics and Mathematics of Financial Markets," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262532654, April.
    23. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    24. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Stentoft, 2013. "American option pricing using simulation with an application to the GARCH model," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 5, pages 114-147, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    3. Chung-Gee Lin & Yu-Shan Wang, 2012. "Evaluating natural resource projects with embedded options and limited reserves," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(12), pages 1471-1482, April.
    4. Manuel Moreno & Javier Navas, 2003. "On the Robustness of Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for Pricing American Derivatives," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 107-128, May.
    5. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    6. Lars Stentoft, 2004. "Convergence of the Least Squares Monte Carlo Approach to American Option Valuation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1193-1203, September.
    7. Lukito Adi Nugroho, 2017. "Real options valuation of franchise territorial exclusivity," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1262490-126, January.
    8. Rombouts, Jeroen V.K. & Stentoft, Lars, 2011. "Multivariate option pricing with time varying volatility and correlations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2267-2281, September.
    9. Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos G. & Abdel Sabour, Sabry A., 2007. "Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: Can the real options make a difference?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 116-125, September.
    10. Minqiang Li, 2010. "A quasi-analytical interpolation method for pricing American options under general multi-dimensional diffusion processes," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 177-217, July.
    11. Chen Liu & Henry Schellhorn & Qidi Peng, 2019. "American Option Pricing With Regression: Convergence Analysis," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-31, December.
    12. Zhongkai Liu & Tao Pang, 2016. "An efficient grid lattice algorithm for pricing American-style options," International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 36-55.
    13. Leif Andersen & Mark Broadie, 2004. "Primal-Dual Simulation Algorithm for Pricing Multidimensional American Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1222-1234, September.
    14. Simon Scheidegger & Adrien Treccani, 2021. "Pricing American Options under High-Dimensional Models with Recursive Adaptive Sparse Expectations [Telling from Discrete Data Whether the Underlying Continuous-Time Model Is a Diffusion]," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 258-290.
    15. Sebastian Maier, 2021. "Re-evaluating natural resource investments under uncertainty: An alternative to limited traditional approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 907-937, April.
    16. Pringles, Rolando & Olsina, Fernando & Garcés, Francisco, 2015. "Real option valuation of power transmission investments by stochastic simulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 215-226.
    17. Barty Kengy & Girardeau Pierre & Strugarek Cyrille & Roy Jean-Sébastien, 2008. "Application of kernel-based stochastic gradient algorithms to option pricing," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 99-127, January.
    18. R. Mark Reesor & T. James Marshall, 2020. "Forest of Stochastic Trees: A Method for Valuing Multiple Exercise Options," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, May.
    19. Peter W. Duck & Chao Yang & David P. Newton & Martin Widdicks, 2009. "Singular Perturbation Techniques Applied To Multiasset Option Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 457-486, July.
    20. Weihan Li & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan & Pakorn Aschakulporn, 2024. "An empirical study on the early exercise premium of American options: Evidence from OEX and XEO options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1117-1153, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:53:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-018-9826-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.