IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v53y2019i1d10.1007_s10614-018-9834-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Complexion of Multi-period Stackelberg Triopoly Game with Bounded Rationality

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Yu

    (Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics)

  • Weisheng Yu

    (Jilin University)

Abstract

Stackelberg model is a dynamic model, in which two players with different scales and power players act sequentially. However, there are few literatures that apply complex oligopoly dynamics theory in this model. In this paper, based on a traditional Stackelberg model, we improve the model in Peng and Lu (Appl Math Comput 271:259–268, 2015) and construct a multi-period Stackelberg triopoly game model. One leader firm and two followers with bounded rationality behavior are considered. The leader’s decision-making variable, which is simplified as a constant in Peng and Lu’s paper, is observed by the followers in stage 1 in every period in this model. We arrive at the conclusion that the leader would have the first-move advantage even when the players adopt a gradient output adjustment process in a multi-period Stackelberg triopoly game model. The speeds of output adjustment form a three-dimensional stability region. In the equilibrium state, the outputs of the followers are one-third of the leader’s. With adjustment speed of the leader increasing, Stackelberg equilibrium would be broken at a certain point. The effect of adjustment speed on speed of convergence to equilibrium is also analyzed. Theoretical result and numerical simulation both demonstrate that the speed converging to equilibrium is slowing when the Lyapunov exponent increases. Strange attractor and the sensitivity on initial values are presented by numerical simulation, while feedback control method is used to eliminate chaos. Moreover, in the stage of periodic bifurcation outside the stability region, the increase of the adjustment speed of the leader could be incentive for choosing chaos. While in the chaos stage, the average profits of three firms are uncertain, which shows that the relative benefit is closely related to adjustment speed of bounded rationality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Yu & Weisheng Yu, 2019. "The Complexion of Multi-period Stackelberg Triopoly Game with Bounded Rationality," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 457-478, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:53:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-018-9834-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-018-9834-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-018-9834-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-018-9834-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gori, Luca & Guerrini, Luca & Sodini, Mauro, 2015. "A continuous time Cournot duopoly with delays," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 166-177.
    2. Cavalli, Fausto & Naimzada, Ahmad, 2015. "Effect of price elasticity of demand in monopolies with gradient adjustment," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 47-55.
    3. Du, Jian-guo & Fan, Yue-qian & Sheng, Zhao-han & Hou, Yun-zhang, 2013. "Dynamics analysis and chaos control of a duopoly game with heterogeneous players and output limiter," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 507-516.
    4. He, Xue-Zhong & Li, Kai, 2012. "Heterogeneous beliefs and adaptive behaviour in a continuous-time asset price model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 973-987.
    5. Puu, T., 1998. "The chaotic duopolists revisited," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 33(3-4), pages 385-394, January.
    6. Junhai Ma & Fang Zhang & Yanyan He, 2014. "Complexity Analysis of a Master-Slave Oligopoly Model and Chaos Control," Abstract and Applied Analysis, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-13, August.
    7. Bischi, Gian Italo & Lamantia, Fabio & Radi, Davide, 2015. "An evolutionary Cournot model with limited market knowledge," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 219-238.
    8. Yu, Weisheng & Yu, Yu, 2014. "The complexion of dynamic duopoly game with horizontal differentiated products," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 289-297.
    9. Yi, Qi Guo & Zeng, Xiang Jin, 2015. "Complex dynamics and chaos control of duopoly Bertrand model in Chinese air-conditioning market," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 231-237.
    10. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian & Xiao, Yue, 2016. "A dynamic Stackelberg duopoly model with different strategies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 128-134.
    11. Elsadany, A.A., 2017. "Dynamics of a Cournot duopoly game with bounded rationality based on relative profit maximization," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 294(C), pages 253-263.
    12. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2012. "The dynamics of a differentiated duopoly with quantity competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 421-427.
    13. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Lamantia, Fabio & Radi, Davide, 2015. "Evolutionary competition between boundedly rational behavioral rules in oligopoly games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 204-225.
    14. Agliari, A. & Naimzada, A.K. & Pecora, N., 2016. "Nonlinear dynamics of a Cournot duopoly game with differentiated products," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 281(C), pages 1-15.
    15. Shi, Lian & Sheng, Zhaohan & Xu, Feng, 2015. "The dynamics of competition in remanufacturing: A stability analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 245-253.
    16. Askar, S.S. & Alshamrani, Ahmad M. & Alnowibet, K., 2015. "Dynamic Cournot duopoly games with nonlinear demand function," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 427-437.
    17. Bischi, Gian Italo & Naimzada, Ahmad K. & Sbragia, Lucia, 2007. "Oligopoly games with Local Monopolistic Approximation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 371-388, March.
    18. Nabih Agiza, Hamdy & Italo Bischi, Gian & Kopel, Michael, 1999. "Multistability in a dynamic Cournot game with three oligopolists," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 63-90.
    19. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian, 2015. "Complex dynamics analysis for a duopoly Stackelberg game model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 259-268.
    20. Jan Tuinstra, 2004. "A Price Adjustment Process In A Model Of Monopolistic Competition," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 417-442.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tian, Yi & Ma, Junhai & Xie, Lei & Koivumäki, Timo & Seppänen, Veikko, 2020. "Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers’ channel preference and sales effort," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Yan, Bo & Ahmadi, Atefeh & Mehrabbeik, Mahtab & Rajagopal, Karthikeyan & He, Shaobo & Jafari, Sajad, 2022. "Expanding the duopoly Stackelberg game with marginal costs into a multipoly game with lowering the burden of mathematical calculations: a numerical analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian & Xiao, Yue & Wu, Xue, 2019. "Complex dynamics analysis for a remanufacturing duopoly model with nonlinear cost," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 658-670.
    2. Mikhail Anufriev & Davide Radi & Fabio Tramontana, 2018. "Some reflections on past and future of nonlinear dynamics in economics and finance," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 91-118, November.
    3. Cars H. Hommes & Marius I. Ochea & Jan Tuinstra, 2018. "Evolutionary Competition Between Adjustment Processes in Cournot Oligopoly: Instability and Complex Dynamics," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 822-843, December.
    4. Peng, Yu & Xiao, Yue & Lu, Qian & Wu, Xue & Zhao, Yueru, 2020. "Chaotic dynamics in Cournot duopoly model with bounded rationality based on relative profit delegation maximization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    5. Xiaoliang Li & Bo Li, 2023. "A Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated products reconsidered," Papers 2301.01007, arXiv.org.
    6. Askar, S.S. & Al-khedhairi, A., 2020. "The dynamics of a business game: A 2D-piecewise smooth nonlinear map," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 537(C).
    7. Yang, Xuenan & Peng, Yu & Xiao, Yue & Wu, Xue, 2019. "Nonlinear dynamics of a duopoly Stackelberg game with marginal costs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 185-191.
    8. Cavalli, Fausto & Naimzada, Ahmad, 2016. "Complex dynamics and multistability with increasing rationality in market games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 151-161.
    9. Shi, Lian & Sheng, Zhaohan & Xu, Feng, 2015. "The dynamics of competition in remanufacturing: A stability analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 245-253.
    10. Gian Italo Bischi & Fabio Lamantia & Davide Radi, 2018. "Evolutionary oligopoly games with heterogeneous adaptive players," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I, chapter 12, pages 343-370, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Naimzada, Ahmad K., 2019. "An oligopoly model with rational and imitation rules," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 254-278.
    12. César García-Díaz & Gábor Péli & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2020. "The coevolution of the firm and the product attribute space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Lorenzo Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad K. Naimzada, 2018. "An evolutionary model with best response and imitative rules," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 313-333, November.
    14. Sarah Mignot & Fabio Tramontana & Frank Westerhoff, 2024. "Complex dynamics in a nonlinear duopoly model with heuristic expectation formation and learning behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 337(3), pages 809-834, June.
    15. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Naimzada, Ahmad K., 2018. "An oligopoly model with best response and imitation rules," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 193-205.
    16. Zhang, Ming & Wang, Guanghui & Xu, Jin & Qu, Cunquan, 2020. "Dynamic contest model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    17. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian & Xiao, Yue, 2016. "A dynamic Stackelberg duopoly model with different strategies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 128-134.
    18. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian & Wu, Xue & Zhao, Yueru & Xiao, Yue, 2020. "Dynamics of Hotelling triopoly model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    19. Tian, Yi & Ma, Junhai & Xie, Lei & Koivumäki, Timo & Seppänen, Veikko, 2020. "Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers’ channel preference and sales effort," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. Kopányi, Dávid, 2017. "The coexistence of stable equilibria under least squares learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 277-300.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Stackelberg model; Multi-period triopoly game; Chaos; Bounded rationality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D52 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Incomplete Markets
    • C62 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:53:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-018-9834-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.