IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/apfinm/v29y2022i2d10.1007_s10690-021-09343-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Dynamic and Static Performance Indexes in the Stock Market: Evidence From Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Jiro Hodoshima

    (Nagoya University of Commerce and Business)

  • Toshiyuki Yamawake

    (Nagoya University of Commerce and Business)

Abstract

We evaluate stock market indexes by the Aumann–Serrano (AS) performance index for multi-period gambles and one-period gambles and the Sharpe ratio. Our results show the AS performance index is more distinct for multi-period gambles than for one-period gambles in evaluation of the Japanese stock market indexes. In other words, a favorable evaluation score as compared to the Sharpe ratio becomes even better in multi-period gambles than in one-period gambles while an unfavorable evaluation score compared to the Sharpe ratio becomes even worse in multi-period gambles than in one-period gambles.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiro Hodoshima & Toshiyuki Yamawake, 2022. "Comparing Dynamic and Static Performance Indexes in the Stock Market: Evidence From Japan," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(2), pages 171-193, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:apfinm:v:29:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10690-021-09343-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10690-021-09343-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10690-021-09343-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10690-021-09343-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niu, Cuizhen & Guo, Xu & McAleer, Michael & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2018. "Theory and application of an economic performance measure of risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 383-396.
    2. Kon, Stanley J, 1984. "Models of Stock Returns-A Comparison," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(1), pages 147-165, March.
    3. Robert J. Aumann & Roberto Serrano, 2008. "An Economic Index of Riskiness," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 810-836, October.
    4. , & ,, 2015. "The Foster-Hart measure of riskiness for general gambles," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), January.
    5. Dean P. Foster & Sergiu Hart, 2009. "An Operational Measure of Riskiness," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 117(5), pages 785-814.
    6. Sergiu Hart, 2011. "Comparing Risks by Acceptance and Rejection," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 119(4), pages 617-638.
    7. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    8. Engle, Robert F & Ng, Victor K, 1993. "Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1749-1778, December.
    9. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    10. Markus Haas, 2004. "Mixed Normal Conditional Heteroskedasticity," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 211-250.
    11. Carol Alexander & Emese Lazar, 2009. "Modelling Regime‐Specific Stock Price Volatility," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 71(6), pages 761-797, December.
    12. Homm, Ulrich & Pigorsch, Christian, 2012. "Beyond the Sharpe ratio: An application of the Aumann–Serrano index to performance measurement," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2274-2284.
    13. Hodoshima, Jiro & Miyahara, Yoshio, 2020. "Utility indifference pricing and the Aumann–Serrano performance index," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-89.
    14. Engle, Robert F, 1990. "Stock Volatility and the Crash of '87: Discussion," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 103-106.
    15. Jiro Hodoshima, 2019. "Stock performance by utility indifference pricing and the Sharpe ratio," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 327-338, February.
    16. Homm, Ulrich & Pigorsch, Christian, 2012. "An operational interpretation and existence of the Aumann–Serrano index of riskiness," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 265-267.
    17. Kadan, Ohad & Liu, Fang, 2014. "Performance evaluation with high moments and disaster risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 131-155.
    18. Alexander, Carol, 2004. "Normal mixture diffusion with uncertain volatility: Modelling short- and long-term smile effects," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2957-2980, December.
    19. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiro Hodoshima & Toshiyuki Yamawake, 2020. "The Aumann–Serrano Performance Index for Multi-Period Gambles in Stock Data," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Hodoshima, Jiro & Yamawake, Toshiyuki, 2022. "Temporal aggregation of the Aumann–Serrano and Foster–Hart performance indexes," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Haas, Markus & Krause, Jochen & Paolella, Marc S. & Steude, Sven C., 2013. "Time-varying mixture GARCH models and asymmetric volatility," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 602-623.
    4. Hodoshima, Jiro & Miyahara, Yoshio, 2020. "Utility indifference pricing and the Aumann–Serrano performance index," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-89.
    5. Alexander, Carol & Lazar, Emese & Stanescu, Silvia, 2021. "Analytic moments for GJR-GARCH (1, 1) processes," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 105-124.
    6. Jiro Hodoshima & Tetsuya Misawa & Yoshio Miyahara, 2020. "Stock Performance Evaluation Incorporating High Moments and Disaster Risk: Evidence from Japan," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 27(2), pages 155-174, June.
    7. Heller, Yuval & Schreiber, Amnon, 2020. "Short-term investments and indices of risk," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), July.
    8. Lu, Richard & Horng, Tzyy-Leng & Horng, Min-Sun & Wang, Amy Z.-H., 2023. "A performance evaluation of portfolio insurance under the Black and Scholes framework: An application of the economic index of riskiness," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 269-276.
    9. Niu, Cuizhen & Guo, Xu & McAleer, Michael & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2018. "Theory and application of an economic performance measure of risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 383-396.
    10. Carol Alexander & Emese Lazar, 2009. "Modelling Regime‐Specific Stock Price Volatility," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 71(6), pages 761-797, December.
    11. Jiro Hodoshima & Toshiyuki Yamawake, 2021. "Sensitivity of Performance Indexes to Disaster Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Toshiyuki Yam awake & Joseph Sheely & Roberto Serrano & Jiro Hodoshima, 2022. "Comparative Performance of Cryptocurrencies through the Aumann and Serrano Economic Index of Riskiness," Working Papers 2022-007, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    13. Ehsani, Sina & Lien, Donald, 2015. "A note on minimum riskiness hedge ratio," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 11-17.
    14. Hodoshima, Jiro, 2021. "The computational property of the Aumann–Serrano performance index under risk-averse and risk-loving preference," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    15. Soo Hong Chew & Jacob S. Sagi, 2022. "A critical look at the Aumann-Serrano and Foster-Hart measures of riskiness," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(2), pages 397-422, September.
    16. Carol Alexander & Emese Lazar & Silvia Stanescu, 2010. "Analytic Moments for GARCH Processes," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2011-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading, revised Apr 2011.
    17. Yuval Heller & Amnon Schreiber, 2020. "Short-Term Investments and Indices of Risk," Papers 2005.06576, arXiv.org.
    18. Goncalves, Silvia & Kilian, Lutz, 2004. "Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 89-120, November.
    19. Takaishi, Tetsuya, 2017. "Rational GARCH model: An empirical test for stock returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 451-460.
    20. Turan Bali & Panayiotis Theodossiou, 2007. "A conditional-SGT-VaR approach with alternative GARCH models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 241-267, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:apfinm:v:29:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10690-021-09343-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.