IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jss/jstsof/v009i02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Anderson-Darling Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Marsaglia, George
  • Marsaglia, John

Abstract

Except for n = 1, only the limit as n approaches infinity for the distribution of the Anderson-Darling test for uniformity has been found, and that in so complicated a form that published values for a few percentiles had to be determined by numerical integration, saddlepoint or other approximation methods. We give here our method for evaluating that asymptotic distribution to great accuracy--directly, via series with two-term recursions. We also give, for any particular n, a procedure for evaluating the distribution to the fourth digit, based on empirical CDF's from samples of size 1010 .

Suggested Citation

  • Marsaglia, George & Marsaglia, John, 2004. "Evaluating the Anderson-Darling Distribution," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i02).
    • Handle: RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:009:i02
    DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/jss.v009.i02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/view/v009i02/ad.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v009i02/ADinf.c.zip
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/downloadSuppFile/v009i02/AnDarl.c.zip
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://hdl.handle.net/10.18637/jss.v009.i02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sung Ik Kim, 2022. "ARMA–GARCH model with fractional generalized hyperbolic innovations," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. BenSaïda, Ahmed & Slim, Skander, 2016. "Highly flexible distributions to fit multiple frequency financial returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 203-213.
    3. Kristian Hindberg & Jan Hannig & Fred Godtliebsen, 2019. "A novel scale-space approach for multinormality testing and the k-sample problem in the high dimension low sample size scenario," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Konstantinos Leptokaropoulos & Catherine A. Rychert & Nicholas Harmon & David Schlaphorst & Ingo Grevemeyer & John-Michael Kendall & Satish C. Singh, 2023. "Broad fault zones enable deep fluid transport and limit earthquake magnitudes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Fernández de Marcos Giménez de los Galanes, Alberto, 2022. "Data-driven stabilizations of goodness-of-fit tests," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35324, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    6. Asmerilda Hitaj & Lorenzo Mercuri & Edit Rroji, 2019. "Sensitivity analysis of Mixed Tempered Stable parameters with implications in portfolio optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 71-95, February.
    7. Kim, Young Shin & Lee, Jaesung & Mittnik, Stefan & Park, Jiho, 2015. "Quanto option pricing in the presence of fat tails and asymmetric dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 512-520.
    8. Grundke, Peter, 2010. "Top-down approaches for integrated risk management: How accurate are they?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 662-672, June.
    9. Zinoviy Landsman & Udi Makov & Tomer Shushi, 2017. "Extended Generalized Skew-Elliptical Distributions and their Moments," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 76-100, February.
    10. Gomes-Gonçalves, Erika & Gzyl, Henryk & Mayoral, Silvia, 2015. "Two maxentropic approaches to determine the probability density of compound risk losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 42-53.
    11. Grace, Adam W. & Wood, Ian A., 2012. "Approximating the tail of the Anderson–Darling distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4301-4311.
    12. Hocine Khelifa & Eric Vagnon & Abderrahmane Beroual, 2023. "Effect of Fullerene and Graphene Nanoparticles on the AC Dielectric Strength of Natural Ester," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Shibin Zhang & Xin M. Tu, 2022. "Tests for comparing time‐invariant and time‐varying spectra based on the Anderson–Darling statistic," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 76(3), pages 254-282, August.
    14. Daniele Coin, 2017. "A goodness-of-fit test for Generalized Error Distribution," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1096, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    15. Fernández-de-Marcos, Alberto & García-Portugués, Eduardo, 2023. "Data-driven stabilizations of goodness-of-fit tests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Andrey Feuerverger, 2016. "On Goodness of Fit for Operational Risk," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(3), pages 434-455, December.
    17. Hasan A. Fallahgoul & Young S. Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi & Jiho Park, 2019. "Quanto Option Pricing with Lévy Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 1279-1308, March.
    18. Dobric, Jadran & Schmid, Friedrich, 2007. "A goodness of fit test for copulas based on Rosenblatt's transformation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4633-4642, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:009:i02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jstatsoft.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.