IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p1995-d1071791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Fullerene and Graphene Nanoparticles on the AC Dielectric Strength of Natural Ester

Author

Listed:
  • Hocine Khelifa

    (Univ Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Ampère, UMR 5005, 69130 Ecully, France)

  • Eric Vagnon

    (Univ Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Ampère, UMR 5005, 69130 Ecully, France)

  • Abderrahmane Beroual

    (Univ Lyon, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Ampère, UMR 5005, 69130 Ecully, France)

Abstract

The current study addresses the impact of the addition of fullerene and graphene nanoparticles on the AC breakdown voltage (AC BdV) of natural ester (FR3). The nanofluids (NFs) were prepared following the two-step process, and the AC BdV was performed in compliance with IEC 60156 standards. Five different concentrations of NPs were considered (0.1 g/L, 0.2 g/L, 0.3 g/L, 0.4 g/L, and 0.5 g/L). A Student’s t -test was performed to compare the base liquid’s AC BdV data with different nanofluids. The experimental data were checked to see if they obeyed the Weibull distribution fitting curve, and the AC BdV at 1%, 10%, and 50% risk levels were then calculated. The performed t -test provides evidence that AC BdV data from the base liquid were different from those of different NFs (except 0.2 g/L fullerene, and 0.1 g/L and 0.4 g/L graphene NFs). It is also shown that the Weibull distribution fit the BdV data of all liquids (except 0.5 g/L fullerene NF), and remarkable improvements of AC BdVs at 1%, 10%, and 50% were observed. The best improvement was obtained with 0.4 g/L fullerene and 0.3 g/L graphene NFs. These results show the importance of using nanofluids as substitutes for the existing insulating liquids for current oil-filled power transformers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hocine Khelifa & Eric Vagnon & Abderrahmane Beroual, 2023. "Effect of Fullerene and Graphene Nanoparticles on the AC Dielectric Strength of Natural Ester," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1995-:d:1071791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hidir Duzkaya & Abderrahmane Beroual, 2020. "Statistical Analysis of AC Dielectric Strength of Natural Ester-Based ZnO Nanofluids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Marsaglia, George & Marsaglia, John, 2004. "Evaluating the Anderson-Darling Distribution," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i02).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. BenSaïda, Ahmed & Slim, Skander, 2016. "Highly flexible distributions to fit multiple frequency financial returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 203-213.
    2. Fernández de Marcos Giménez de los Galanes, Alberto, 2022. "Data-driven stabilizations of goodness-of-fit tests," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35324, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    3. Shibin Zhang & Xin M. Tu, 2022. "Tests for comparing time‐invariant and time‐varying spectra based on the Anderson–Darling statistic," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 76(3), pages 254-282, August.
    4. Miloš Šárpataky & Juraj Kurimský & Michal Rajňák & Michal Krbal & Marek Adamčák, 2022. "Dielectric Performance of Natural- and Synthetic-Ester-Based Nanofluids with Fullerene Nanoparticles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Zinoviy Landsman & Udi Makov & Tomer Shushi, 2017. "Extended Generalized Skew-Elliptical Distributions and their Moments," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 76-100, February.
    6. Fernández-de-Marcos, Alberto & García-Portugués, Eduardo, 2023. "Data-driven stabilizations of goodness-of-fit tests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Dobric, Jadran & Schmid, Friedrich, 2007. "A goodness of fit test for copulas based on Rosenblatt's transformation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4633-4642, May.
    8. Sung Ik Kim, 2022. "ARMA–GARCH model with fractional generalized hyperbolic innovations," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Daniele Coin, 2017. "A goodness-of-fit test for Generalized Error Distribution," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1096, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    10. Samson Okikiola Oparanti & Ungarala Mohan Rao & Issouf Fofana, 2022. "Natural Esters for Green Transformers: Challenges and Keys for Improved Serviceability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Kristian Hindberg & Jan Hannig & Fred Godtliebsen, 2019. "A novel scale-space approach for multinormality testing and the k-sample problem in the high dimension low sample size scenario," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Dariusz Zmarzły & Paweł Frącz, 2021. "Measurement of Dielectric Liquid Electrification in the Shuttle System with Two Parallel Electrodes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Konstantinos Leptokaropoulos & Catherine A. Rychert & Nicholas Harmon & David Schlaphorst & Ingo Grevemeyer & John-Michael Kendall & Satish C. Singh, 2023. "Broad fault zones enable deep fluid transport and limit earthquake magnitudes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Gomes-Gonçalves, Erika & Gzyl, Henryk & Mayoral, Silvia, 2015. "Two maxentropic approaches to determine the probability density of compound risk losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 42-53.
    15. Asmerilda Hitaj & Lorenzo Mercuri & Edit Rroji, 2019. "Sensitivity analysis of Mixed Tempered Stable parameters with implications in portfolio optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 71-95, February.
    16. Kim, Young Shin & Lee, Jaesung & Mittnik, Stefan & Park, Jiho, 2015. "Quanto option pricing in the presence of fat tails and asymmetric dependence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 512-520.
    17. Grundke, Peter, 2010. "Top-down approaches for integrated risk management: How accurate are they?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 662-672, June.
    18. Hasan A. Fallahgoul & Young S. Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi & Jiho Park, 2019. "Quanto Option Pricing with Lévy Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 1279-1308, March.
    19. Grace, Adam W. & Wood, Ian A., 2012. "Approximating the tail of the Anderson–Darling distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4301-4311.
    20. Andrey Feuerverger, 2016. "On Goodness of Fit for Operational Risk," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(3), pages 434-455, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1995-:d:1071791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.