IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v56y2012i12p4301-4311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximating the tail of the Anderson–Darling distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Grace, Adam W.
  • Wood, Ian A.

Abstract

The Anderson–Darling distribution plays an important role in the statistical testing of uniformity. However, it is difficult to evaluate, especially in its tail. We consider a new Monte Carlo approach to approximate the tail probabilities of the Anderson–Darling distribution. The estimates are compared with existing tables and recent numerical approximations, obtained via numerical inversion and naive Monte Carlo. Our results demonstrate improved accuracy over existing tables and approximating functions for small tail probabilities. We also present an approximating function for tail probabilities of less than 3×10−2.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace, Adam W. & Wood, Ian A., 2012. "Approximating the tail of the Anderson–Darling distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4301-4311.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:12:p:4301-4311
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016794731200151X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2012.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert L. Smith, 1984. "Efficient Monte Carlo Procedures for Generating Points Uniformly Distributed over Bounded Regions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 1296-1308, December.
    2. Marsaglia, George & Marsaglia, John, 2004. "Evaluating the Anderson-Darling Distribution," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i02).
    3. Pierre L'Écuyer & Jean-François Cordeau & Richard Simard, 2000. "Close-Point Spatial Tests and Their Application to Random Number Generators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 308-317, April.
    4. Gregory Camilli, 1995. "The relationship between Fisher's exact test and Pearson's chi-square test: A bayesian perspective," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 305-312, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pang, Zhenan & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Du, Dangbo & Pei, Hong, 2021. "A Bayesian Inference for Remaining Useful Life Estimation by Fusing Accelerated Degradation Data and Condition Monitoring Data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Anzilli & Silvio Giove, 2020. "Multi-criteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: a general approach through non-additive measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 559-582, December.
    2. Corrente, Salvatore & Figueira, José Rui & Greco, Salvatore, 2014. "The SMAA-PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 514-522.
    3. BenSaïda, Ahmed & Slim, Skander, 2016. "Highly flexible distributions to fit multiple frequency financial returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 203-213.
    4. Stephen Baumert & Archis Ghate & Seksan Kiatsupaibul & Yanfang Shen & Robert L. Smith & Zelda B. Zabinsky, 2009. "Discrete Hit-and-Run for Sampling Points from Arbitrary Distributions Over Subsets of Integer Hyperrectangles," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 727-739, June.
    5. Fernández de Marcos Giménez de los Galanes, Alberto, 2022. "Data-driven stabilizations of goodness-of-fit tests," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35324, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    6. Hazan, Aurélien, 2017. "Volume of the steady-state space of financial flows in a monetary stock-flow-consistent model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 589-602.
    7. Dimitris Bertsimas & Allison O'Hair, 2013. "Learning Preferences Under Noise and Loss Aversion: An Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1190-1199, October.
    8. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "Better decisions with less cognitive load: The Parsimonious BWM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Shibin Zhang & Xin M. Tu, 2022. "Tests for comparing time‐invariant and time‐varying spectra based on the Anderson–Darling statistic," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 76(3), pages 254-282, August.
    10. Haramoto, Hiroshi & Matsumoto, Makoto, 2019. "Checking the quality of approximation of p-values in statistical tests for random number generators by using a three-level test," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 66-75.
    11. Qi Fan & Jiaqiao Hu, 2018. "Surrogate-Based Promising Area Search for Lipschitz Continuous Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 677-693, November.
    12. Reuven Rubinstein, 2009. "The Gibbs Cloner for Combinatorial Optimization, Counting and Sampling," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 491-549, December.
    13. Jing Voon Chen & Julia L. Higle & Michael Hintlian, 2018. "A systematic approach for examining the impact of calibration uncertainty in disease modeling," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 541-561, October.
    14. Luis V. Montiel & J. Eric Bickel, 2014. "A Generalized Sampling Approach for Multilinear Utility Functions Given Partial Preference Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 147-170, September.
    15. Kiatsupaibul, Seksan & J. Hayter, Anthony & Liu, Wei, 2017. "Rank constrained distribution and moment computations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 229-242.
    16. Pavel Shcherbakov & Mingyue Ding & Ming Yuchi, 2021. "Random Sampling Many-Dimensional Sets Arising in Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Brunelli, Matteo & Corrente, Salvatore, 2024. "Modeling criteria and project interactions in portfolio decision analysis with the Choquet integral," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Etienne de Klerk & Monique Laurent, 2018. "Comparison of Lasserre’s Measure-Based Bounds for Polynomial Optimization to Bounds Obtained by Simulated Annealing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1317-1325, November.
    19. Cheng, Haiyan & Sandu, Adrian, 2009. "Efficient uncertainty quantification with the polynomial chaos method for stiff systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(11), pages 3278-3295.
    20. Zinoviy Landsman & Udi Makov & Tomer Shushi, 2017. "Extended Generalized Skew-Elliptical Distributions and their Moments," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 76-100, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:56:y:2012:i:12:p:4301-4311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.