IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v224y2004i3p351-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mehr Wettbewerb im bundesstaatlichen Finanzausgleich?: Eine allokative und distributive Wirkungsanalyse für das Jahr 2005 unter Berücksichtigung der Neuregelungen

Author

Listed:
  • Lenk Thomas

    (Institut für Finanzen der Universität Leipzig, Jahnallee 59, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Lenk Thomas, 2004. "Mehr Wettbewerb im bundesstaatlichen Finanzausgleich?: Eine allokative und distributive Wirkungsanalyse für das Jahr 2005 unter Berücksichtigung der Neuregelungen," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 224(3), pages 351-378, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:224:y:2004:i:3:p:351-378
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2004-0305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2004-0305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-2004-0305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geske, Otto-Erich, 2001. "Wenn gesetzliche Konkretisierungen zu allgemeinen Maßstäben führen sollen," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 81(4), pages 214-221.
    2. Lenk, Thomas, 1999. "Bei der Reform der Finanzverfassung die neuen Bundesländer nicht vergessen!," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 79(3), pages 164-173.
    3. Baretti, Christian & Huber, Bernd & Lichtblau, Karl, 2001. "Die Reform des Finanzausgleichs im Spannungsfeld zwischen ökonomischer Rationalität und Besitzstandsdenken," IW-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, vol. 28(2), pages 38-58.
    4. Fehr, Hans, 2001. "Fiskalische und allokative Konsequenzen des neuen Länderfinanzausgleichs," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 81(10), pages 573-579.
    5. Bernd Huber & Christian Baretti & Karl Lichtblau, 2000. "A Tax on Tax Revenue. The Incentive Effects of Equalizing Transfers: Evidence from Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 333, CESifo.
    6. Lenk Thomas & Birke Anja, 2001. "Ein Vorschlag zur zukünftigen Verteilung der Finanzierungslasten des Fonds „Deutsche Einheit“," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 221(1), pages 102-114, February.
    7. Lenk, Thomas, 2003. "Die Finanzkraftreihenfolge im bundesstaatlichen Finanzausgleich," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 83(8), pages 524-530.
    8. Ebert, Werner & Meyer, Steffen, 1999. "Die Anreizwirkungen des Finanzausgleichs," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 79(2), pages 106-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fehr Hans & Tröger Michael, 2003. "Wer finanziert den Fonds „Deutsche Einheit"? Die Gemeindefinanzen im Zeichen der Bund-Länder-Finanzbeziehungen," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 223(6), pages 743-751, December.
    2. Achim Truger & Dieter Vesper, 2014. "Zur Reform des Länderfinanzausgleichs ? eine Notwendigkeit?," IMK Studies 37-2014, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    3. Hans Pitlik & Friedrich Schneider & Harald Strotmann, 2006. "Legislative Malapportionment and the Politicization of Germany's Intergovernmental Transfer System," Public Finance Review, , vol. 34(6), pages 637-662, November.
    4. Ebert, Werner & Meyer, Steffen, 1999. "Die Berücksichtigung der Gemeindefinanzen im Länderfinanzausgleich: Zwischen Verfassungsrecht und Ökonomie," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 3, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    5. Friedrich Schneider & Hans Pitlik & Harald Strotmann & Günther Schmid, 2001. "On the politicization of intergovernmental fiscal relations in Germany after unification," Economics working papers 2001-05, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    6. Hechtner, Frank, 2013. "Ökonomische Anreizwirkungen im bundesstaatlichen Finanzausgleich," Discussion Papers 2013/15, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    7. Pablo Sanguinetti & Martin Besfamille, 2004. "Exerting local tax effort or lobbying for central transfers?: Evidence from Argentina," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 249, Econometric Society.
    8. Bird, Richard M. & Smart, Michael, 2002. "Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 899-912, June.
    9. Norbert Berthold & Stefan Drews, 2003. "Die Bundesländer vor dem finanziellen Kollaps: Wo Gefahr ist, wächst das Rettende auch," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 56(11), pages 22-29, June.
    10. Michael Klien & Hans Pitlik & Matthias Firgo & Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger, 2020. "Ein Modell für einen strukturierten vertikalen Finanzausgleich in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 65854.
    11. Renn, Sandra, 2005. "Demografischer Wandel und langfristiges Angebot öffentlicher Leistungen im föderativen System," Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Färber, Gisela (ed.), Das föderative System in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme, Reformbedarf und Handlungsempfehlungen aus raumwissenschaftlicher Sicht, volume 127, pages 174-205, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    12. Christian Baretti, 2002. "Wird gute Standortpolitik bestraft? Die Anreizeffekte des kommunalen Finanzsystems," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(07), pages 10-16, April.
    13. Ralf Hepp & Jürgen von Hagen, 2012. "Fiscal Federalism in Germany: Stabilization and Redistribution Before and After Unification," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 42(2), pages 234-259, April.
    14. Richard M. Bird, 2012. "The GST/HST: Creating an Integrated Sales Tax in a Federal Country," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 5(12), March.
    15. Suraj BADAIK, 2017. "Impact of fiscal responsibility legislations on state finances in India," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(612), A), pages 115-124, Autumn.
    16. Angel De la Fuente & Christian Kastrop & Michael Thöne, 2016. "Regional Financing in Germany and Spain: Comparative Reform Perspectives," Working Papers 16/04, BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department.
    17. Fritz Söllner, 2001. "Die Einwohnerveredelung im Länderfinanzausgleich," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(03), pages 25-29, March.
    18. Robert Fenge & Jakob von Weizsäcker, 2001. "How Much Fiscal Equalization? A Constitutional Approach," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 157(4), pages 623-633, December.
    19. Christian Baretti & Bernd Huber & Karl Lichtblau, 2001. "Das Maßstäbegesetz auf dem Prüfstand," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(11), pages 12-20, October.
    20. Richard M Bird & Andrey V Tarasov, 2004. "Closing the Gap: Fiscal Imbalances and Intergovernmental Transfers in Developed Federations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(1), pages 77-102, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:224:y:2004:i:3:p:351-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.