IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jis/ejistu/y2023i02id524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Value-Creating and Supporting Component of the Value Chain in the Production Process

Author

Listed:
  • TALÍŘ Milan
  • STRAKOVÁ Jarmila
  • VÁCHAL Jan
  • KOLLMANN Jaroslav

Abstract

Normal 0 21 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; text-align:center; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:EN-US; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} This research focuses on the application of the Process Value Added (PVA) method in the environment of custom piece production at STS Prachatice a.s. The main objective was to identify the most profitable and most loss-making processes, to evaluate the value added of individual production operations, to assess the potential for outsourcing certain processes, and to analyse the profitability of specific orders. The study uses a selection of 30 atypical orders from 2022, obtaining data on selling prices, production hours and costs associated with production and overhead. The analysis shows that manufacturing processes add the most value, while inspection processes are less profitable. Processes suitable for outsourcing were identified, especially when in-house capacity is not used. It was also found that the most profitable orders are those that combine high product uniqueness with efficient use of materials and production hours. The PVA methodology allowed to quantify the added value in the context of time and cost parameters and revealed that contracts with high time pool and unit costs have the most significant added value. PVA indices were established to better reflect the results achieved. The research findings have practical implications for the organization and efficiency of the production process at STS Prachatice, contribute to the development of business policy and procurement activities, and serve as innovative material for academic purposes. The study demonstrates that the PVA method is an effective tool for analysing and optimising business processes, enabling companies to better understand and manage process value-added in order to increase profitability and competitiveness. The implementation of this method in practice has shown concrete economic benefits and provided valuable information for further business policy and procurement solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • TALÍŘ Milan & STRAKOVÁ Jarmila & VÁCHAL Jan & KOLLMANN Jaroslav, 2023. "Analysis of Value-Creating and Supporting Component of the Value Chain in the Production Process," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2023:i:02:id:524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejist.ro/files/pdf/524.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ejist.ro/abstract/524/Analysis-of-Value-Creating-and-Supporting-Component-of-the-Value-Chain.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Talitha Nathaniela Nariswari & Nugi Mohammad Nugraha, 2020. "Profit Growth: Impact of Net Profit Margin, Gross Profit Margin and Total Assets Turnover," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 87-96, October.
    2. Ali Bastas, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies: A Systematic Review of Latest Trends and Themes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Qiao & Yiping Xia & Xiang Li & Zheng Li & Yan Ge, 2023. "Higher-order Graph Attention Network for Stock Selection with Joint Analysis," Papers 2306.15526, arXiv.org.
    2. Nida Arshad & Fareeha Waseem & Syeda Fizza Abbas, 2022. "Factors Affecting Dividend Payout Ratio of Dividend Paying Firms Listed on KSE-100 Index," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(2), pages 164-183, june.
    3. Samar Issa & Gulhan Bizel & Sharath Kumar Jagannathan & Sri Sarat Chaitanya Gollapalli, 2024. "A Comprehensive Approach to Bankruptcy Risk Evaluation in the Financial Industry," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Swapnilsingh Thakur & Shailesh Rastogi & Neha Parashar & Pracheta Tejasmayee & Jyoti Mehndiratta Kappal, 2023. "The Impact of ICT on the Profitability of Indian Banks: The Moderating Role of NPA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Kenneth T. Benignos & Kristin Iris G. Estores, 2022. "Viability of an Integrated Farm as an Agritourism Site in Toboso, Negros Occidental inthe New Normal," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 483-502, August.
    6. Valentina De Simone & Valentina Di Pasquale & Maria Elena Nenni & Salvatore Miranda, 2023. "Sustainable Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Contexts: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Yuli Liu & Mingyi Shang & Jianwei Xu & Lei Zhang & Honglian Hua, 2023. "Value Chain and the Integrated Development of Manufacturing and Modernized Services: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Elizabeth Hoyos & María Camila Serna & Jeroen De Backer & Jonathan Martin, 2023. "Sustainability Score Comparison of Welding Strategies for the Manufacturing of Electric Transportation Components," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    added value; analysis; product portfolio; PVA; production processes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2023:i:02:id:524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Popescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.