IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijba11/v6y2015i2p106-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison between Generation X and Generation Y in Terms of Individual Innovativeness Behavior: The Case of Turkish Health Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Sema Yigit
  • Kadir Aksay

Abstract

Today the criterion of innovation has become a paradigm for all institutions to maintain their success. Innovation is essential for service industry as well as production industry. It is the individual that is in the center of innovation, which can be defined as the difference between a good idea and a good product. The innovative work behavior of individuals is an area that needs to be scrutinized in terms of innovativeness. Because innovation directly effects the quality of life, it has a significant role in the health sector. In this perspective, this study aims to identify the innovativeness level of individuals working in health industry where innovation is of significance; to identify the differences of innovativeness levels between generations; and to identify the relationship between individuals¡¯ perception of whether the institution they work have learning orientation and their level of innovativeness. The data in this study, which specifically addresses health institutions with their increasing role in the information society, were gathered from the three private hospitals in Black Sea Region in Turkey. 274 health professionals working in those three private hospitals and accepting to take part in the study formed the sample group of the study. The results of the study show that there is a difference of innovative behavior scores between the participants coming from Generation X and Y. This difference indicates that Generation X is more innovative. Moreover, majority of the participants from Generation X are physicians. In this respect, it can be noted that in terms of innovative behavior the difference between physicians and other health professionals (professional difference) is more significant than the difference between generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sema Yigit & Kadir Aksay, 2015. "A Comparison between Generation X and Generation Y in Terms of Individual Innovativeness Behavior: The Case of Turkish Health Professionals," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 106-117, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:106-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/6625/3947
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/6625
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chien‐Huang Lin & Ching‐Huai Peng & Danny T. Kao, 2008. "The innovativeness effect of market orientation and learning orientation on business performance," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(8), pages 752-772, November.
    2. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    3. Jiménez-Jiménez, Daniel & Sanz-Valle, Raquel, 2011. "Innovation, organizational learning, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 408-417, April.
    4. Patrick J. Montana & Francis Petit, 2008. "Motivating Generation X And Y On The Job And Preparing Z," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 2(2), pages 139-148.
    5. Chloé Guillot-Soulez & Sébastien Soulez, 2014. "On the heterogeneity of Generation Y job preferences," Post-Print halshs-00973533, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariia Evdokimova & Anastasia Stepanova, 2023. "Students’ Propensity To Innovate: Correlates, Determinants, And Impact On GPA," HSE Working papers WP BRP 265/EC/2023, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Jacinta Ana Neves & Ephrem Habtemichael Redda & Natasha de Klerk & Natasha de Klerk, 2018. "External Factors Influencing the Cognitive Response of Impulse Buying Behaviour amongst Generation Y Students," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(5), pages 264-273.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koronios, K. & Mavromati, M. & Kriemadis, A., 2017. "Motivating Public Sector Employees: Evidence from Greece," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 10(1), pages 7-12, March.
    2. Dev K. Dutta & Vishal K. Gupta & Xiujian Chen, 2016. "A Tale of Three Strategic Orientations: A Moderated-Mediation Framework of the Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Market Orientation, and Learning Orientation on Firm Performance," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 313-348, September.
    3. Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Gallego-Nicholls, José Fernando & Guijarro-García, María, 2021. "A recipe for success: Crowdsourcing, online social networks, and their impact on organizational performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Zhenia Tahmasebinia & Aliakbar Jokar & Amir Mohebi & Sogand Fardmehregan & Mehdi Beigi & Foozhan Tahmasebinia, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Market and Strategic Orientations on Business Performance by Emphasizing the Role of Innovation as a Mediator," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(2), pages 67-84, December.
    5. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    6. Cheng, Cheng-Feng & Chang, Man-Ling & Li, Chu-Shiu, 2013. "Configural paths to successful product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2561-2573.
    7. Chen, Chia-Chen & Chang, Chin-Hsuan & Hsiao, Kuo-Lun, 2022. "Exploring the factors of using mobile ticketing applications: Perspectives from innovation resistance theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Algarni, Mohammad A. & Ali, Murad & Leal-Rodríguez, Antonio L. & Albort-Morant, Gema, 2023. "The differential effects of potential and realized absorptive capacity on imitation and innovation strategies, and its impact on sustained competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    9. Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin, 2021. "Two heads are better than one: matchmaking tools in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1045-1069, May.
    10. Weiling Ke & Lele Kang & Chuan-Hoo Tan & Chih-Hung Peng, 2021. "User Competence with Enterprise Systems: The Effects of Work Environment Factors," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 860-875, September.
    11. Arnett, Dennis B. & Sandvik, Izabela L. & Sandvik, Kåre, 2018. "Two paths to organizational effectiveness – Product advantage and life-cycle flexibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 285-292.
    12. Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 100-110.
    13. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Cevahir Uzkurt & Halil Semih Kimzan & Cengiz Yılmaz, 2016. "A Case Study of the Mediating Role of Innovation on the Relationship Between Environmental Uncertainty, Market Orientation, and Firm Performance," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(06), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Sujin Park & Ali Tafti & Galit Shmueli, 2024. "Transporting Causal Effects Across Populations Using Structural Causal Modeling: An Illustration to Work-from-Home Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 686-705, June.
    17. Kristoffer Moeller, 2018. "Culturally clustered or in the cloud? How amenities drive firm location decision in Berlin," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 728-758, September.
    18. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    19. Sheng, Margaret L. & Chien, Iting, 2016. "Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2302-2308.
    20. Mengelkamp, Esther & Schönland, Thomas & Huber, Julian & Weinhardt, Christof, 2019. "The value of local electricity - A choice experiment among German residential customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 294-303.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:106-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jenny Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijba.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.