IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v5y2016i4p89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Relationship between the Typology of Knowledge-Intensive Businesses (KIBs) and Performance Measurement Systems (PMS): Evidence from Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Tsung Lu
  • Yeun-Wen Chang

Abstract

This study utilizes the source of knowledge (internal or external) to derive four types of knowledge-intensive businesses (KIBs)- non-KIB, knowledge creator, knowledge introducer, and knowledge integrator. Moreover, this study investigates the differences among the four types of KIB in their organizational characteristics and performance measurement system (PMS). The proposed model is empirically evaluated using survey data collected from top or middle managers of 127 Taiwan companies in which 109 companies are classified as KIBs. Based on the analysis of multiple regressions and MANOVA, the empirical results reveal that there are significant differences in the organizational characteristics and PMS among the four types of KIBs. There are three main contributions in this research- (1) we categorize the KIBs into four types by using the main source of internal or external knowledge in the companies. This typology of KIBs would contribute to our understanding of knowledge management. (2) This study uses environmental uncertainty, innovation strategy, size and absorptive capacity to construct the organizational configuration of different KIBs. (3) We find that there are significant differences among the four types of KIB in the financial or non-financial PMS.This study utilizes the source of knowledge (internal or external) to derive four types of knowledge-intensive businesses (KIBs)- non-KIB, knowledge creator, knowledge introducer, and knowledge integrator. Moreover, this study investigates the differences among the four types of KIB in their organizational characteristics and performance measurement system (PMS). The proposed model is empirically evaluated using survey data collected from top or middle managers of 127 Taiwan companies in which 109 companies are classified as KIBs. Based on the analysis of multiple regressions and MANOVA, the empirical results reveal that there are significant differences in the organizational characteristics and PMS among the four types of KIBs. There are three main contributions in this research- (1) we categorize the KIBs into four types by using the main source of internal or external knowledge in the companies. This typology of KIBs would contribute to our understanding of knowledge management. (2) This study uses environmental uncertainty, innovation strategy, size and absorptive capacity to construct the organizational configuration of different KIBs. (3) We find that there are significant differences among the four types of KIB in the financial or non-financial PMS.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Tsung Lu & Yeun-Wen Chang, 2016. "A Study on the Relationship between the Typology of Knowledge-Intensive Businesses (KIBs) and Performance Measurement Systems (PMS): Evidence from Taiwan," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(4), pages 1-89, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/9964/6326
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/9964
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veugelers, Reinhilde & Cassiman, Bruno, 1999. "Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 63-80, January.
    2. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F. & Randall, Taylor, 2003. "Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 715-741.
    3. Ioannis Giotopoulos, 2014. "Dynamics of Firm Profitability and Growth: Do Knowledge-Intensive (Business) Services Persistently Outperform?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 291-319, November.
    4. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Julia A. & England, Claire, 2019. "An ethnographic study of culture and performance in the UK lingerie industry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 241-258.
    2. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    4. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Caniato, Federico & Ronchi, Stefano, 2018. "Effects of monitoring and incentives on supplier performance: An agency theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 322-332.
    5. Jean‐François Henri & Steeve Massicotte & Dominique Arbour, 2020. "Exploring the Consequences of Competing Uses of Budgets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 257-268, December.
    6. van Veen-Dirks, Paula, 2010. "Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 141-164, February.
    7. Agostino, Deborah & Arnaboldi, Michela, 2012. "Design issues in Balanced Scorecards: The “what” and “how” of control," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 327-339.
    8. Schönefeld, Carsten & Möller, Klaus & Engelhardt, Philipp, 2015. "Erfolgstreiber Innovationskennzahlen," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(3), pages 322-350.
    9. Bedford, David S. & Malmi, Teemu & Sandelin, Mikko, 2016. "Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 12-28.
    10. David J. Cooper & Mahmoud Ezzamel & Keith Robson, 2019. "The Multiplicity of Performance Management Systems: Heterogeneity in Multinational Corporations and Management Sense‐Making," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 451-485, March.
    11. Amizawati Mohd Amir, 2011. "The indirect effects of PMS design on Malaysian service firms' characteristics and performance," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 31-49, May.
    12. Henri, Jean-François & Wouters, Marc, 2020. "Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Henri, Jean-François & Journeault, Marc, 2010. "Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 63-80, January.
    14. Utz Schäffer & Matthias D. Mahlendorf & Jochen Rehring, 2014. "Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries Endanger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 21-38, March.
    15. Nebojša Janićijević, 2013. "Matching Compensation System With The Type Of Organizational Culture," Serbian Association of Economists Journal, SAE - Serbian Association of Economists, issue 5-6, pages 309-324, September.
    16. Laura Barbieri & Daniela Bragoli & Flavia Cortelezzi & Giovanni Marseguerra, 2015. "Public Support to Innovation Strategies," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1509, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    17. Cimoli, Mario & Primi, Annalisa & Rovira, Sebastián, 2011. "National innovation surveys in latin America: empirical evidence and policy implications," Documentos de Proyectos 3897, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Matt Grimes, 2010. "Strategic Sensemaking within Funding Relationships: The Effects of Performance Measurement on Organizational Identity in the Social Sector," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 763-783, July.
    19. Gavin M Schwarz & Karin Sanders & Dave Bouckenooghe, 2020. "In the driving seat: Executive’s perceived control over environment," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 317-342, May.
    20. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.