IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v13y2024i4p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Acquisition Costs and Analysts’ Cash Flow Forecasts: The Role of Management Cash Flow Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Ting He
  • Michael Imhof
  • Kenneth Zheng

Abstract

We examine whether the provision of managerial cash flow forecasts is a significant predictor of analysts’ decision to cover a firm with cash flow forecasts. Unlike managerial earnings forecasts, which are often issued to walk down analyst earnings estimates, managers issue cash flow forecasts to counter bad earnings news and lessen the cost of investor and analyst information acquisition (Wasley & Wu, 2006). Motivated by the increasing popularity of managerial cash flow forecasts and prior empirical evidence that analysts are less likely to follow a firm for which the costs of acquiring financial information are prohibitive (e.g., Liu, 2011), we predict and find that the provision of managerial cash flow forecasts is a significant determinant of the likelihood of analyst cash flow coverage. We also find that analysts are less likely to issue cash flow forecasts when the effort necessary to follow a firm is high. Together, the evidence suggests that the existence of management cash flow forecasts is an important determinant of analysts’ cash flow coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting He & Michael Imhof & Kenneth Zheng, 2024. "Information Acquisition Costs and Analysts’ Cash Flow Forecasts: The Role of Management Cash Flow Forecasts," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(4), pages 1-1, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/26691/16573
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/26691
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles E. Wasley & Joanna Shuang Wu, 2006. "Why Do Managers Voluntarily Issue Cash Flow Forecasts?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 389-429, May.
    2. Suresh Radhakrishnan & Shu†Ling Wu, 2014. "Analysts' Cash Flow Forecasts and Accrual Mispricing," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 1191-1219, December.
    3. Lee, Bryan Byung-Hee & Lee, Jay Junghun, 2024. "Financial statement comparability and analysts’ optimism for accruals," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ehu:cuader:55444 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Abigail Allen & Melissa F. Lewis‐Western & Kristen Valentine, 2022. "The Innovation and Reporting Consequences of Financial Regulation for Young Life‐Cycle Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 45-95, March.
    3. Sandip Dhole & Ferdinand A. Gul & Sagarika Mishra & Ananda M. Pal, 2021. "The joint information role of analysts’ cash flow and earnings forecasts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 499-541, March.
    4. Yang, Daecheon & Kim, Hyuntae, 2020. "Managerial overconfidence and manipulation of operating cash flow: Evidence from Korea✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    5. Uzi Yaari & Andrei Nikiforov & Emel Kahya & Yochanan Shachmurove, 2012. "Consistent Valuation Cash Flow," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-009, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    6. Xiaomeng Chen & Meiting Lu & Yaowen Shan & Yizhou Zhang, 2021. "Australian evidence on analysts' cash flow forecasts: issuance, accuracy and usefulness," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 3-50, March.
    7. Wen He & Hwee Cheng Tan & Leon Wong, 2020. "Return windows and the value relevance of earnings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2549-2583, September.
    8. Steven J. Monahan, 2006. "Discussion of Why Do Managers Voluntarily Issue Cash Flow Forecasts?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 431-436, May.
    9. Kim, Young Jun & Lee, Joonil & Lee, Su Jeong & Sunwoo, Hee-Yeon, 2017. "Do mutual funds exploit the accrual anomaly?: Korean evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB), pages 227-242.
    10. Wu, Chen-Hui, 2022. "The informativeness of brokerage reports: Privately-circulated versus publicly-disseminated news," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Yu‐An Chen & Dan Palmon, 2023. "Financial analysts' bundling across firms: Target prices and stock recommendations," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 46(4), pages 1047-1102, December.
    12. Bozanic, Zahn & Roulstone, Darren T. & Van Buskirk, Andrew, 2018. "Management earnings forecasts and other forward-looking statements," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 1-20.
    13. Marcus L. Caylor & Dennis J. Chambers & Sunay Mutlu, 2022. "Financial reporting uniformity: Its relation to comparability and its impact on financial statement users," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(9-10), pages 1457-1488, October.
    14. Miguel Duro & Jonas Heese & Gaizka Ormazabal, 2019. "The effect of enforcement transparency: Evidence from SEC comment-letter reviews," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 780-823, September.
    15. Elitzur, Ramy, 2020. "Data analytics effects in major league baseball," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Agapova, Anna & Volkov, Nikanor, 2019. "Guidance on strategic information: Investor-management disagreement and firm intrinsic value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Andreas Charitou & Irene Karamanou & Anastasia Kopita, 2018. "The determinants and valuation effects of classification choice on the statement of cash flows," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 613-650, September.
    18. Somohano Rodríguez, Francisco M. & López Fernández, José Manuel & Martínez García, Francisco Javier, 2018. "El efecto de la innovación en el resultado empresarial durante la recesión económica. Una aplicación a la industria de la automoción," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 91-105.
    19. Brown, Rhoda & Jones, Michael, 2015. "Mapping and exploring the topography of contemporary financial accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 237-261.
    20. Guan, Yuyan & Zhang, Liandong & Zheng, Liu & Zou, Hong, 2021. "Managerial liability and corporate innovation: Evidence from a legal shock," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    21. Elizabeth A. Gordon & Elaine Henry & Bjorn N. Jorgensen & Cheryl L. Linthicum, 2017. "Flexibility in cash-flow classification under IFRS: determinants and consequences," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 839-872, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.